New Challenger: 3 Reasons Why Gaming Will Destroy Itself Part 1
10 hours 9 mins ago
Gaming has made some amazing changes in the last ten years. Here is GamesRadar's comparison between gaming in 1998 and gaming in 2008. Go to the source for the full article ...
Seeing as it took almost 40 years for movies to learn how to talk, gaming hasnt exactly shuffled its feet. It hasnt even been 40 years since Computer Space became the first commercial game, and what began as little more than dandruff on a black screen is already threatening photo-, audio- and physical realism. So lets look closer at how times have changed, starting with the year that gave us Dana International, 1998.
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Jan 6, 2009
Most recently commented on by on Jan 6, 2009





Comments
Like many (at least according to AVGN), I feel the PS1 was the last console of the golden age of gaming.
In 10 years, where will we be? I don't think we'll stll have quite the photorealistic look, but the biggest budget, best designed games will take your breath away, I'm sure. Well, if you saw em now anyhow. In the future, it would just be a bit better than last year's visuals.
But I have oft imagined taking modern games and technology, and showing it to people from the past. Go back about 20+ years (or if you prefer, the dawn of Video games, the Pong era), and stuff like HDTVs and Cell architectures would seem like something out of a Sci-fi movie. Hell, even now we've got stuff coming out that seems sci-fi like. Flexible LCDs anybody?
Please don't post that. Comments like those are getting predictable and annoying. Even today while the market seems to be leaning towards casual gamers, there are still enough hardcore games to satisfy, and in 10 years, I can see the market being more balanced out as several casual gamers might become hardcore games.
But anyway, like Omega said in 10 years I can see the 8th generation wrapping up, as I race around trying to catch all 900+ Pokemon. But Ill still be yelling at everyone on the forums for their stupid ideas about Zelda MMOs and Metal Gear coming to Xbox.
Try comparing 1988 to 1998. Now that's another story.
You remember that round, shiny thing Princess Leia shoved into R2-D2 back in 1977? My Mum still talks about how baffled everyone was about that at the time.
Lol, I don't think I even saw Star Wars episode 4 until CDs had already came out XD
But really, isn't it kinda freaky (in a cool way) that bits of plastic (and other synthetic materials) can hold stuff like videos, text, pictures, GAMES, etc?....
DAMN YOU EA and your domination tactics....starting to become the Adolf Hitler of gaming.
I think we all know what game I'm talking about.
I don't know, so i'll take a guess:
LoZ:OoT?
Metal Gear Solid 4 got a 94 while Bioshock got a 96.
LoZ: Ocarina of Time, on the other hand, got a 99.
Its almost as if your saying just because it got the highest average, its therefore the greatest.
I don't even like Zelda games so I'm not going to consider it the greatest game of all time just because it scored more than MGS4.
But you're right, its all a matter of opinion. My last post with the review scores wasn't meant to be serious, haha. I haven't even touched MGS4 or Bioshock since I beat them, so I wouldn't consider them my favorite games.
LoZ OoT was majikal
NO U
Mastur Ch33f called COD4
"Cock Off Doody Modirn Gay*bleep*stupid.
Hilarious.
But only 1 game will we never get, in 10 years time we'll still be waiting for Duke Nukem Forever.
Hopefully with Unreal Engine 6 =/
I mean magical beams that shoot up your nose??
EPIC.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.