New Challenger: 3 Reasons Why Gaming Will Destroy Itself Part 1
10 hours 17 mins ago
SlapStic owner Ryan Rigney writes about his newfound love for writing "MicroReviews" via Twitter for his followers/RSS subscribers. Are reviews this short really the best way to inform the masses? Read the arguments here and decide yourself...
With this in mind, I began writing what I at first simply called "140 Char Reviews." I soon changed the name to "MicroReviews," and as of the time of this writing, I've posted more than 30 in a few short days via Twitter. Here are some examples of MicroReviews that I've posted:
Gears of War 2 MicroReview: Great level design until towards the end, has awesome multiplayer. Play story co-op. Horde mode is AMAZING. (A)




Comments
Yeah, if a friend asks you if the latest entry in the Halo series is any good then you won't spend half an hour explaining all the finer details. Said friend is after a quick response from someone they trust to have good taste.
However, when someone goes looking for reviews of a product they generally want details. They don't actually know you as a person, so you simply saying 'this game is awesome' doesn't tell them a whole lot. Anybody can label a game as awesome or not but unless its backed with reasoning then it won't mean anything to anyone that doesn't know you.
Way of the future? I seriously hope not.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.