We all know the old saying that games don't make good movies and movies don't make good games. Everyone has their own opinions on why this is the case. But who's right? Surely Leigh Alexander, news director for Gamasutra, is getting close with this blog.

It sure looks like scriptwriters and producers consistently aren't "getting it" when it comes to what's lovable about a video game they're trying to translate to the big screen. On the other side of the canyon, audiences are unlikely to understand Resident Evil or Final Fantasy VII when it's presented as film, outside of its native context.

But is it really that film production is just not taking games seriously enough? That the film industry doesn't understand how sophisticated games really are?

Perhaps to an extent; unfamiliar with the language of games, films often mistranslate a title's appeal. That's what happened with Silent Hill, which might have been successful as a well-acted psychological thriller – but turned out mediocre, if we're being kind. It reproduced the game's visual style and feel almost unsettlingly, even chill-inducingly, going as far as to incorporate pieces of Akira Yamaoka's original soundtrack.

But it completely missed the boat on what makes Silent Hill appealing – its psychological subtlety – and instead zeroed in on the series' most obvious elements, stripping them of their context and highlighting their ridiculousness. It might have been possible to make a complex, mature Silent Hill movie if it had focused on the right things.

The dominant problem, though, is that the narratives of games are unfortunately not nearly as sophisticated, intelligent, affecting or entertaining as we think they are.

Story can be important to games, and sophisticated story is arguably key to advancing the medium beyond toy status. But it's not always necessary to an excellent video game – just look at the strength and success of Resident Evil even despite its ridiculous plot lines. Resident Evil 4 is so good, for example, that it manages to be awesome even though it features an annoying Napoleon-man chasing Leon with a gigantic mechanical version of himself – and he's a lot more appealing than the girl you've got to rescue. That's a seriously solid game, right there.
| More
Images about this story:
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 0
    Daigoji_Gai Feb 20, 09
    TRON is the holy grail of video game movies. Period.

    I would argue the Day of the Dead remake (nothing like Romero's original) is Left 4 Dead the movie. There is a boomber, tons of screamers, one witch moment, and one awesome "smoker" moment when a guy gets pulled up into a vent shaft...

    Oh, and Any Given Sunday is Blitz the Movie...
  • 4
    FinalFantasyFanaticc Feb 20, 09
    I enjoyed the Resident Evil trilogy of Films.

    I also enjoyed Degeneration and Advent Children.

    Silent Hill was meh, but it was still a good movie capture.

    Most TERRIBLE AND UTTER CRAP movie based on a game though? *bleep*in Bloodrayne ; ; Uwe Boll needs to leave the film industry.
    • 0
      Subzer0* Feb 20, 09
      You're kidding me? Aside from Degeneration (which was okay) and AC... Every movie you listed is garbage. You must be easy to please. =/

      I agree with you about Uwe Boll btw.
      • 4
        FinalFantasyFanaticc Feb 20, 09
        I'm actually quite hard to please. I just watched the movies and looked at them not as the video game itself, but as a movie adaption which will vary compared to the video games.

        Kay, so the Resident Evil trilogy didn't really have much to do with the games, cept that Umbrella was in it and it had Nemesis and other zombies that are in the games. Yet they were still solid movies with good storylines which had similarities to the games.

        It's like saying the Harry Potter films are garbage because they vary to the books. It'd take a while to fit the whole book into a film, just like it would to fit a 9-12hour long game into a film.
  • 1
    phowell23 Feb 20, 09
    Video game movies will never be able to please everyone. If you make it for the averge joe whose never played or heard of the game youll have the fans of the game bitch and if you make it for the fans of the game and have stuff that only they will understand it wont make any money and no averege person will get it. If a video game movie is ever going to succeed it needs to come out as "based off of the xxxxxx game".
    • 0
      Euphoric Feb 20, 09
      Why? Most of them keep the title of the game so it's not hard to figure out. And for those who haven't heard of the game then it usually mentions it in the summary/overview of the film somewhere.
  • 0
    Killosity Feb 20, 09
    I thought the Silent Hill movie was fantastic! It tended to drag on and outstay its welcome, with a dissapointing unbalance between reality and hell, but I enjoyed it!
  • 0
    Miss Razz Feb 21, 09
    quote
    On the other side of the canyon, audiences are unlikely to understand Resident Evil or Final Fantasy VII when it's presented as film, outside of its native context.
    quote
    Story can be important to games, and sophisticated story is arguably key to advancing the medium beyond toy status. But it's not always necessary to an excellent video game – just look at the strength and success of Resident Evil even despite its ridiculous plot lines.
    Is that really the case though? I don't get why so many people think that the Resident Evil games couldn't be made into proper movies. All you need is a creepy mansion, a bunch of zombies, clueless STARS members uncovering hints about what went on there, and Wesker's betrayal at the end. Heck, plenty of good horror movies have worked with less.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.