Top 5 Sonic Games
16 hours 7 mins ago
It's so strange to see Battlefield Heroes and Grand Theft Auto tied to one article but I'm afraid its true, 18+ rated games like the GTA series aren't the only ones to be victimised and scrutinised under the latest epidemic that seems to be sweeping the world.
Battlefield Heroes is a 12+ rated free to play game. Not even released yet and still under closed beta status yet already within the forums, problems are occuring, well see for yourself in the quote below which was taken directly from the forum itself.
this is out of order. why would you moderators and wannabe moderators try and alienate the community. just from looking round it seems that theres been a small group of you people, who are trying to create a class devide.
some of your responses to 13 to 15 year olds is nothing short of a disgrace, regardless of there behaviour.
we recently had a suicide here, were a young boy hanged himself over an argument
about a game.
looking around here, there are some people who arent even moderators, and are trying to come accross as moderators, and when things dont go there way. they try and belittle people in what they think is a subtle way. i am shocked and worried that one of these pretend moderators, who clearly have no people skills, are going to send an emotional child over the edge. and cuase tragic consequences. to be honest this forum needs to be closed, it is shocking watching whats going on.
News story attached to:
Additional sources:
- Battlefield Heroes Forums (battlefield-heroes.com)






Comments
about a game." huh? If anyone comes across any links to this incident, please post'em .I'd like to read more.
However I do believe that he might just be an annoyed and angry person for not getting a beta key and is trying to make stuff up in order to get the site shut down (which you must be an idiot to face off against DICE let alone the mothership company EA)
To be honest, what you see in there is what I saw, Goodman was pretty quick to delete the actual offensive posts and only reason I vented in GG and my blog is because I respect him, so when he said to leave it be, I left it be.
People judge on first impressions and so when they hear that a teenager shot his dad because he took Halo 3 away from him, people start talking about it and make the wrong opinions. A bad reputation is then given to not just the game and company involved but also the gaming industry, it basically has a knock-on effect and then the bandwagon gets an upgrade to accomodate more idiots.
Meanwhile the actual reason for the teenager shooting his dad is because he is a spoilt brat that doesn't get his way and so in order to get his own way, he kills. Yet to try and get out of a murder charge and stay out of prison, he gives out a plea of guilt while pleading that he was influenced by the game. This usually gets them off the hook to the point they can treatment and rehab while serving a sentence, certainly nothing compared to what they should be serving and so they get off lightly, all the while the gaming industry gains this bad rep.
I would say that's victimisation, to wrongly accuse an individual or group of something they haven't done
he wasn't going to make it in the real world, anyway.
omigod omigod wats ur prblm man? D:
The reason the argument on the forum is linked to this is because the initial person arguing stated that someone hung themselves over an argument about a game, instead of blaming the two people involved, he is essentially blaming videogames for starting the argument which then led to the kid hanging himself...how hard is that to see?
How hard is it to see that my whole argument to this whole situation is that It isn't the games you should be blaming but people themselves A videogame doesn't say "go kill this many people in your town" or "You can't win the argument, hang yourself" Only people can do that and my whole point is that this anti-gaming group can not see the faults of the human race and so they blame something else.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.