Final Fantasy XIII is one of the most anticipated titles for the PlayStation 3 not only in Japan but all around the world. It was said that Final Fantasy XIII was to take the PS3's hardware to the limit and showcase how PS3's games should really be displayed, that's until Square Enix shockingly announced a Xbox 360 version earlier last year.

Since the developers made this announcement, they've constantly said that the PS3 version would not be affected by the 360 version, but we all know this if far from the truth. In many comparison screenshots of the game, you could already tell that the game's graphics have already been downgraded and also due to the 360 still using DVD's, another concerning problem is capacity space.

It's already been confirmed that the 360 version will come on multiple DVD's but how will this affect the PS3 version in the process? Also due to this limitation it has been confirmed that the PS3 version has been compromised so it could look identical to the 360 version. This was confirmed earlier during an interview at GameTrailers.

The developer still stick by their statement that the PS3 version hasn't been affected, but even if this is true, they've delayed the game in the western part of the world, so the 360 version actually has affected PS3 fans in many ways, but only time will tell from what's behind this ugly truth.

Looking on the bright side of this situation, Final Fantasy Versus XIII is still in development and is exclusive to the PS3. When both games are released, it would be evident to see if the 360 version actually did affect FFXIII at all.

Unlike many of these articles, which look at the delay of PS3 version of the game due to the 360 or the difference in graphics since the Xbox 360 version of the game, this article looks at one specific limitation of the Xbox 360 which has affected the gameplay of the PS3 version, the multiple discs issue.
| More
News story attached to:
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Sep 7, 2009
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 7
    DystopiaSticker Sep 5, 09
    Gosh dern it now it'll look like an Atari game because of that gosh dern evil 360!
    • 9
      Goldva_X Sep 5, 09
      quote DystopiaSticker
      Gosh dern it now it'll look like an Atari game because of that gosh dern evil 360!
      360 ruin d final fnatasy,dmc,tekken,gta etc etc etc... microsoft ruin sony busines sony should sue them i am vry infuriated with microsoft
      • 0
        Storm* Sep 6, 09
        They ruined two games that aren't out yet, and two games that did well if not better on their console? Ok, if you say they are ruining those series' then I'll believe you. I mean, why would a company try to go multi-platform and gain more profit, right? That's just crazy.

        And really, Sony didn't fight hard enough to keep things exclusive. Prior to the PS3's release, I'm certain they mentioned that they aren't concerned with exclusives, their fans were their main support. That's nice and all, but surely nothing to sue over.
        • 0
          RabidChinaGirl Sep 7, 09
          Storm, I think it was a joke.
        • 0
          Storm* Sep 7, 09
          Oh...well it was a terrible joke. At least put better language. xD
  • 10
    Shuyu Sep 5, 09
    quote
    you could already tell that the game's graphics have already been downgraded
    Because it will always be the 360's fault, it's not as if they simply overestimated what the PS3 could do and when they threw more into the game it suddenly became impossible to keep the game performing well. No, definitely the 360's fault.

    quote
    they've delayed the game in the western part of the world
    Since when? Hm? When did they ever announce a date that they went back on? Any answers to that? No? Didn't think so. Even in Japan, it's not coming out until the end of the year. In JAPAN, where there's no 360 version. Care to explain that to me?

    And of course it's a PS3 site writing this. And that's okay. If a 360 site wrote something about how the PS3 was damaging a game, it would be disregarded as a blatant fanboy rant.

    I'm getting sick and tired of this bullshit and I'm getting sick and tired of everyone ENABLING this bullshit. Let's break it down to the simplest of terms. Square Enix is some sort of RPG god in Japan. Why would they piss off their own nation's fanbase by shitting on the only version that country will get?
    • 0
      SUPREM_KITE Sep 6, 09
      Actually they have said in interviews that they are pushing back the ps3 release worldwide to coincide with the 360 release. They have stated that the ps3 version should be done 3 to 4 months ahead of the 360 version they just want one giant world release.
      • 5
        Cruxis Mana Sep 6, 09
        Of course the PS3 version is going to be completed first, considering the PS3 version alone is being released in Japan at the end of 2009.

        Square Enix have never said in an interview that the PS3 release will be 'pushed back' to coincide with the 360 version in NA or PAL territories either.
        • 5
          Miss Razz Sep 6, 09
          Squeenix only said they were aiming for a simultaneous PS3/360 release in the West. And for some bizarre reason, PS3 fanboys interpreted that as "360 is holding back our game" and that spread throughout sites.
  • 0
    ITANI Sep 5, 09
    Well we do have to wait till the 360 version is finished before it gets released in the western part of the world and that's how the PS3 version got delayed.
    • 11
      Cruxis Mana Sep 5, 09
      Final Fantasy XIII has technically never been delayed since Square Enix never announced a release date to start with.
  • 5
    Reenee Sep 5, 09
    OHMIGOD MULTIPLE DISCS END OF THE GODDAMN WORLD

    LOVE IS OVER
    • 0
      Fallen Royalty Sep 5, 09
      But it's not the multiple discs that are the problem. So what if they have to break up one Blu-Ray disc into multiple DVDs? The problem is that due to the technical limitations of the DVD versus the Blu-Ray, the DVD transfers less data per second and therefore they have to scale down the quality of the PS3 version so it looks the same.

      What they're saying is, we could have lusher textures with Blu-Ray, but they want to make it look the same as DVD so they're downgrading it.
      • 1
        KyLeDaWg Sep 6, 09
        Actually, the 360 is able to read at a faster rate than the PS3. PS3 has a 2x Blu-Ray drive, which means 9 MB/s. The 360 has a 12x DVD drive, which means 15.85 MB/s.

        That's actually from the first model too. They've apparently upgraded to a newer model called "BenQ" which they claim is faster and quieter.

        I don't think the graphical limitations have anything to do with the disc read rate. And from what I've read before, the 360's GPU is actually way better as well... Not really sure if the PS3 has a graphics advantage at all, really. The CPU might be better but as far as I know, that's just there to process the code, nothing to do with the graphics.
        • 0
          Reenee Sep 7, 09
          If your CPU is doing graphical work, you have a serious problem.

          Also, S-E might save an assload of space if they down-rezzed the pre-rendered cinematics.
  • 8
    Cruxis Mana Sep 5, 09
    I've already posted this on another forum but it's still a good rule;



    If it does well on n4g, it's shit news. =D
    • 0
      Linkin Park Fan Sep 5, 09
      Lol, all you have to do is blame/attack one console to get to the top article on that site.
  • 5
    FinalFantasyFanaticc Sep 5, 09
    In no way did the 360 having to use multiple discs effect the release of the PS3 version.

    Fanboy bait is obvious =|

    That said, i'm probably getting it on PS3.
    • 0
      dmf_dynasty Sep 5, 09
      They're not saying that the 360 using multiple disks has anything to do with the downgrade. They're basically saying that the PS3 version looks worse than in previous videos because they had to downgrade the visuals to be equal to those on the 360 version.

      Whether this is true or not, not really sure.
  • 0
    Province Sep 5, 09
    You mean aside the release date? =S

    Aside that, yeah nothing.
    • 3
      Xeros_the_Slayer* Sep 5, 09
      What release date? You kinda have to have an announced release date in the first place to have it changed.
  • 2
    Smoke Sep 5, 09
    I've read the same article somewhere else, not quite sure where. But yeah, I can see these things happening, no option to switch audio tracks and breaking it down by chapters. It's not fanboy rants, it's just something that's plausible. Bungie said today at the PAX that the limited space they were dealing with from the DVD compromised a few things, like the Assault Rifle for ODST.

    If Bungie had to take out the Assault rifle on the first disk just due to space limitations, it's plausible that extra audio tracks weren't added for the same reason. And the way Square-enix has been picking favorites recently, it's definitely believable.
  • 0
    Kepp123 Sep 5, 09
    Multiple discs are annoying ass *bleep* i guess im going to buy this for the ps3. Well happy role playing ppl. WHen ever this shit comes out.
  • 0
    Kave En Sep 5, 09
    The start of what is going to be a long downfall for the 360.

    The 360 is showing age, and just to get a few more games out on the shelves, Microsoft are paying insane amounts of money, they don't care if the quality of the game is suffering because of their console's restrictions.

    I'm not a FF fan, but damn, this trend gets old fast.
    • 10
      Cruxis Mana Sep 5, 09
      1). Check the 360's 2009/2010 line-up. I think you'll find that it's far from 'dying'.

      2). Microsoft didn't pay to get FFXIII on the 360. Square Enix made the decision to go multiplatform as part of their new marketing strategy.

      3). The quality of FFXIII isn't suffering because of the 360. The developers have stated time and time again that the game is still being made with the PS3 in mind and that the 360 version will be a near identical port.

      People need to remember that Square Enix's engine, Crystal Tools, is a multiplatform engine and so the porting process has been quick and thus why the porting process hasn't adversly affected the PS3 version.
    • 3
      Storm* Sep 6, 09
      Again? Kave En, is it really necessary to speak as if you're some disjointed analyst who talks like they know the facts? Haha, you're entire second sentence can be slightly edited to make more sense:

      "The PS2 is showing age, and just to get a few more games out on the shelves, Sony are paying insane amounts of money, they don't care if the quality of the game is suffering because of their console's restrictions."

      Sony have backed the PS2 more because many families have now decided to pick it up. With the recent recessions, cash is something hard to come by...and what has a great library and is the cheapest supported console on the market now? PS2, of course. Developers need to start off with the PS2 if they are doing a multi-platform game that is scheduled to hit the previous gen console, which in the long run gives us the short end of the stick.

      And besides, their "restrictions" aren't that far behind. The 360 has had some amazing-looking games, and the multi-plat title comparisons between it and the PS3 show very little difference.
  • 5
    Subzer0* Sep 5, 09
    Why am I not surprised ITANI posted this?

    I doubt there would be any affect though. Still remains to be seen.
  • 2
    Solid Snake 4Life Sep 5, 09
    Wow fanboys! Seriously "we could have lusher textures with Blu-Ray" OMG I forgot that graphics made the game. Thats why def jam icon was such a better game then the first few oh wait...
    Seriously Square has never dissapointed with final fantasy (spin-offs not included) you guys think they are gonna mess that up. Square knows how to make a game, and if the ps3 fanbases biggest concern is the graphics your not really a gamer. Your just a fanboy as a good game will be good no matter it's graphics.
    • 0
      Fallen Royalty Sep 6, 09
      Graphics don't make the game, but there's no reason one system should have worse graphics than it could have because of the technical limitations of another system. Nobody said graphics make the game, they said it's unfair to downgrade the quality on both systems because one system doesn't have the hardware.

      Your straw-man argument doesn't hold up well.
      • 4
        Miss Razz Sep 6, 09
        If the game looked like shit, then sure, there'd be a reason to complain. But the graphics are still gorgeous. Everything still looks amazing. So what's the big deal? The PS3 version is hardly suffering a downgrade in quality worth mentioning if the game still looks absolutely stunning. I ain't complaining!

        Seriously, people are complaining that these graphcis and these graphics aren't good enough? It boggles my mind.
        • 0
          Xeros_the_Slayer* Sep 6, 09
          Yeah, that's very pretty either way.

          Kinda reminds me of the comments on Monster Hunter Tri being "OMG that looks like shit" because it's on the Wii. Except Capcom went and made undeniably the most beautiful game the console will probably ever see and even have nintendo going "You can do that?"
  • 2
    Bale Fire Sep 5, 09
    To everyone saying either A)This is bullshit or B)Graphics don't matter, read the actual article, you'll find not only is this not about the graphics, but this has been said by Square Enix themselves. The Audio and pacing have suffered, and you have to admit that's more than a bit annoying for PS3 owners. I'm not a fanboy, but know what you're talking about before you bash it.
    • 4
      Cruxis Mana Sep 6, 09
      Unless they have a copy of the final game I've no idea how on earth they'd know anything of the games pacing...
      • 0
        Bale Fire Sep 6, 09
        I see no reason why Square Enix would not have any idea about how their own game paces
    • 5
      Miss Razz Sep 6, 09
      quote
      but this has been said by Square Enix themselves
      Then Squeenix have got their wires crossed...

      Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIII Going Multiplatform Hasn't Affected The Game
    • 7
      Shuyu Sep 6, 09
      Implying that people calling the article out haven't even read it is a bit much. I have to ask if YOU watched the video they're referring to. They've been on GG for a week, just so you know. In case you can't be bothered watching it, Kitase comments on some things.

      Okay, so you don't get Japanese voices. For starters, you want, import it. Secondly, it was cut because - and Kitase says this specifically - "the movies take up a lot of room." Why do they take up so much room? I own PS2 games (so, DVD games) that have dual audio. Why could we do it then and not now? Because the scenes are seemingly that *bleep*ing pretty and there's so many of them. You get a visually stunning game and the sacrifice is a HUMONGOUS (these things take up a fair bit of space - 50 hour long story, HD audio, it's not a small speck in the data size) audio track. What is wrong with people when they'd prefer it to be the other way around? Everyone's already bitching about the graphics have been downgraded. But when they have been preserved as best as possible at the cost of Japanese voices, people bitch some more. Listen everyone - can't have it both ways. Not at the moment. Make your choice and stick with it. But know that it has been YOUR choice and you can't blame anyone else.

      Starting from 1:13 is this:
      "The 360 and PS3 versions really don't have any differences. When we first announced that Final Fantasy XIII was gonna go multiplatform, we already had a PS3 version that was on its way to completion, and we took that exact game and transported it to the 360 version, so there was nothing that affected the PS3 version in developing the 360 version."

      But we should give more credit to the PS3-specific sites than the producer of the game in question. Because they're a PS3-specific site and clearly dedicated only to writing pathetic fanbait making sure PS3 owners get a good deal.

      At 1:47 in the video: "So the decision to take out the Japanese voice option was not so much a result of seeing the differences between the hardware, but really the mission for the team for Final Fantasy XIII was to bring it out to a worldwide audience as soon as possible. [...] Because when they decide to include multiple language tracks, there's a lot of testing that you have to go do that might delay[...]"

      There you have it. Can't get much simpler than that, really. He then goes on about people who find it difficult to follow subtitles and the action of the game at the same time and the costs involved. 4:21, not a mention of pacing in this particular video.

      Aiming for 3 discs on the 360, which we knew about. The 360 versions seems like it's going to be the one to suffer with the compression, the way he's saying it. No mention of anything being cut to accommodate the capacity differences. No issues with pacing, no scene cuts, not a shred of content affected EXCEPT for the Japanese audio, which was never likely to be included anyway.

      To be honest, I don't know what this website is talking about and I have a strange feeling they don't know what they're talking about, either. I'm going to assume that they were just relying on people not realising just how full of shit they really are.

      And might I suggest that next time you know what YOU are talking about before insinuating that others don't.
      • 2
        DualSoul Sep 7, 09
        In that same video regarding Japanese language option, the producer stated "We still have no plans for Japanese voice option, but that's still been a really big request. We receive a lot of questions about that, so we'll definitely consider it for the future."

        He goes on to say "Of course the PS3, the blu-ray disc has a lot of space on it and there is capacity for it, but for Final Fantasy XIII, the movies take a lot of room on the disc and also, we didn't want there to be any difference between the 360 and the PS3 versions at all. We wanted to make sure it was kept equal and that's why we decided to go with this option."

        What this clearly means is that they know a lot of people want this feature (Japanese audio track) and are till this day still asking about it. Yet despite this, they decided not to include it because they don't want there to be any differences between the PS3 and 360 versions. Regardless of the producer's assurances to the contrary, the PS3 version has suffered because of the 360 version. The video also states that they are trying to compress the 360 version as much as possible to make it identical to the PS3 version. If the producer is so fixated on having absolutely no differences between the versions, what do you think will happen IF (and I stress IF) after compression, the 360 version looks noticeably inferior? The only option will be to downgrade the PS3 version. Let's face it, when making a multiplatform title, both versions end up being downgraded in one way or another as opposed to exclusive games which are tailor made for one particular system. The moment the 360 version was announced, the PS3 version immediately suffered. After all, both consoles have their strengths and weaknesses when compared.

        It's silly to tell people to import the game if they want Japanese audio, because the menus will be in Japanese and there will be no subtitles. Good luck playing the game. No one is pretending to understand Japanese, hell, one of them even stated that he prefers foreign films subtitled, but when he goes with his family he watches them dubbed because of his kids.

        The producer is just offering a bunch of half-assed contradictory explanations to convince the public that that one version of the game has not suffered because of the other. In the end, the reason for any downgrade in this case comes down to one thing. Disc space. The PS3 has it and the 360, no matter how great of a system it is, does not.
        • 2
          Cruxis Mana Sep 7, 09
          quote
          The only option will be to downgrade the PS3 version.
          Again, considering the PS3 version is being released, I see no way they could pssibly do that unless they have a mass recall of the game in Japan...

          Square Enix will NOT compress the PS3 version of the game solely to benefit the 360 version.

          And if you think that the 360 version of the game will look so significantly different to the PS3 version after compression then I think you need to step back and look at some of the things that are already possible on the 360. Mass Effect 2 comes to mind immediately.





          quote
          The moment the 360 version was announced, the PS3 version immediately suffered.
          Then how come we don't get this shit everytime the PS3 loses an exclusive? Which, frankly, has happened a lot over the last few years....
  • 1
    Solid Snake 4Life Sep 5, 09
    Did square ever announce how the game would proceed? Seems to me like the website assumed the story would proceed in a certain way.And you seem to forget that all Final Fantasy's including 10+ have areas that serve only one function then you never come back.
    So what the major complaint is no Japanese voices now? As long as the English voice actors are good I dont care.
  • 5
    Miss Razz Sep 6, 09
    I feel quite happy with myself for reacting with "meh" to that news.
    If it's been comprimised, then so be it. If not, then so be it. I honestly couldn't care less. If I enjoy the game in the end, then I couldn't give a damn whether the graphics aren't top notch, or whether the English dubbing isn't Oscar worthy, or whether there's no Japanese audio option, or whether the pacing is slightly off, or whether it requires a billion discs, or whatever.
    I. Just. Don't. Care.
  • 4
    RabidChinaGirl Sep 6, 09
    I'm already sick of this game with all the this fanboy crap preceding it.
  • 0
    Tiger of Wu Sep 6, 09
    Of course it affected it. If it was originally a 360 exclusive the PS3 version would have effected that. The fact is, if anyone's thinking it's made a major change on the bad side, they're *bleep*ing retarded.
  • 3
    BANDITO ATTACK Sep 6, 09
    i love the exclamation point at the end of the article title. *bleep*ing lol'd heartily.
  • 1
    conel3* Sep 6, 09
    whatever idiot was stupid enough to write an article about this deserves to have their game delayed.
  • 1
    Darknet* Sep 6, 09
    I can live without Japanese tracks. It'd be nice for a second play through but whatever. And the whole "inaccessible areas on different discs" thing doesn't bother me that much. I'm use to it with Lost Odyssey.
    • 0
      Xeros_the_Slayer* Sep 6, 09
      Lost Odyssey had a very nice reason though, those places usually got blown up.
  • 1
    Principality Sep 7, 09
    I don't care either way.

    Story makes a Final Fantasy title, not graphics. Who cares if the graphics are scaled down to match that of the 360. Graphics emulated on the 360 are still gosh darn a sight for sore eyes - so what's the point in complaining about it?

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.