New “Playstation 3 the Best” and “PSP the Best” games revealed
20 hours 17 mins ago
Gary Marston of dualshockers.com doesn't see what the big deal is about Call of Duty 4. He believes it is "just another average shooter that plays exactly the same as everything else in the genre". Agree? Disagree?
Go to the source for the full article...
I’ve never been more excited in my life. I’m given an opportunity to publically vent my personal feelings over Call of Duty 4, and I know you’re all immediately going to go batshit crazy once it’s published. So with the possibility of death threats aside, let’s crack on with why I plain just don’t like Call of Duty 4.
First off, I’m not one of those irritating people that “dislike” something just to stand out from the crowd. I don’t really mind the whole hype malarkey as it usually tends to point me in the right direction for my next game purchase. Hell, the main reason I purchased Call of Duty 4 was because of the hype! There’s no denying it, First-Person shooters are a saturated market. The quality titles are few and far between, and it is in this spirit which made me wonder just why so many millions of people admire and adore Call of Duty 4 so much?
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Oct 11, 2009
Most recently commented on by on Oct 11, 2009







Comments
TBH I'm not a CoD worshiper either, though I don't dislike it.
I finally caved and tried the demo the other day and really didn't care for it either. I hate the way it "felt" -- very cheap. Granted I didn't spend much time with it, but for that reason.
...good points bud.
What I really find ridiculous is the fact that he claims Battlefield: Bad Company had a better story... really? I think he's gotten it into his head that originality is a lot more important than functionality, which I'm sure most agree that it is not.
Way to dumb the story down. I like how he skips over the part where you take control of a Marine who, after risking his life to save another Marine, is hit by the shockwave of a nuclear weapon and crashlands where he spend his last few moments walking aimlessly in a devastated city with his last sight being a bright white light generated by a mushroom cloud. Or the part where you lie bleeding on a collapsing bridge while all the men that you fought with throughout the game are killed one by one around you.
25char
Anyway, the writer wants to get traffic. The points he makes aren't exactly valid, and as Turmoil pointed out he's conveniently left out a lot of the game.
So, sure, it isn't a very unique story. But for what it is, it is very well done. It pits the player in very intense and powerful moments that gets the blood pumping. Do you go see a summer action flic for the deep, innovative story? No. You go to see shit blow up, and you damn well *bleep*ing enjoy it. But even comparing CoD4 to an action flic is kind of harsh, because it does feel a fair bit more emotional.
As for the graphics, I don't honestly know what he means. I found them pretty good, but even if they aren't up to par with whatever delusional standards he may have, going as far as to say they are a "minor step up from the PS2" indicates – along with how poor of a case he makes – that he is trying to stir up fanboy rage for traffic.
Eh, I happen to love the CoD series, it's my favorite FPS series. The style, gameplay, etc., I could tell that IW put time and effort into the games.
Resistance 2 is a prime example. The first game was great, but in 2 they changed everything and it felt to much like CoD and that is why a lot of people hated it. They changed what made resistance great.
Killzone 2 tried to be its own game, but when the demo came out, everyone bitched about the controls because they weren't like CoD. In fact the controls in KZ2 worked just fine for THAT GAME. But GG still released a patch allowing them to play with CoD controls, but all those people who did that sucked at the game because it was more difficult to play with those settings.
What everyone agrees on is that it nails the genre pretty darn well.
100% agree with Miss Razz.
IMO NO shooter has a story as brilliant as the MGS series.MGS is my favourite series of all time and I woulnd't change a single thing about them.Well I would like a MGS that takes like 100 hours to finish but that's it
MGS1 is my most played game of all time.
As for COD4, I can't say anything about it other than I have never been interested in it and likewise with the second one.
Wasn't a fan of Raiden. He's cool in MGS4, sure, but in MGS2 he just annoyed me...was disappointed that Snake was only playable in the first chapter. Eh, not that Raiden's bad, i just prefer Snake.
I am actually very picky with my porn.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.