Neocrisis.com are sick and tired of Valve's treatment of the PS3 and the PS3 community, and they want something done about it. Go to the source to read what has got them so riled up.

Only a few days after Gearbox's Randy Pitchford made comments about how Valve's stubbornness about PS3 development is only an excuse, it seems like Valve's answer to my question of whether they would prove either Randy or HipHopGamer right seems to sadly be the former answer.

CVG recently conducted an interview with Left 4 Dead project lead Chet Faliszek, and he made a comment that no one should ever make in the game industry about ANY community of gamers. This was aimed at the PS3 gamers, insulting them yet again by saying, "In hooking up with your friends and the community aspects, I think the Xbox 360 is head and shoulders above the PS3. The 360 and PC are on par, right?", and that Left 4 Dead 2 will be exclusive for that reason alone.

Never mind the fact that the community in Uncharted 2 seems to disprove Chet right “cheir”, but it's also an amusing claim when you look at what the 360 community is made up of sometimes, and why Chet couldn't be any further from the truth, and should be fired for the comments. And this comes just when a Steam Community member just posted a petition in the hopes that Valve considers PS3 development.
| More
News story attached to:
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Nov 8, 2009
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 5
    chautemoc Nov 7, 09
    Seriously overreacting.
  • 5
    Smoke Nov 7, 09
    That's a bit... much I'd say. The guy seems to have a straight out vendetta against Valve
  • 7
    RabidChinaGirl Nov 7, 09
    Wow, this guy seems to be taking it pretty personally, maybe? The comments are sad; anyone who tries to disagree gets rated down or flamed. The nerd rage is strong here.

    Get over yourselves.

    ... or rage at Activision instead.
  • 0
    Existence Nov 7, 09
    They're all dicks. This guy, the who guy commented on PSN, Gabe Newell, Bill Gates and Kayne West.
    • 2
      chautemoc Nov 7, 09
      I'm a dick, too, while we're at it.
  • 0
    Province Nov 7, 09
    Everyman is a dick in some way, any exception is either gay or an invading race of body snatchers from mars.

    P.S: Not a snipe at homosexuals, they are just generally are more down to earth at times...aside the odd extremist
    • 2
      Existence Nov 7, 09
      If everyman is a dick... is anyone really a dick?

  • 1
    Storm Nov 7, 09
    Seriously? Why even bother, the PC versions of Valve's games are superior in every way anyway...just get a decent rig and stop whining.
    • 2
      Kave En Nov 7, 09
      quote Storm
      Seriously? Why even bother, the PC versions of Valve's games are superior in every way anyway...just get a decent rig and stop whining.
      Sorry, that's a little hard to do in a *bleep*ing global recession.
      • 3
        Storm Nov 7, 09
        Lemme guess, you believe a good gaming rig costs too much? Well until not too long ago, a good gaming PC would cost less than a PS3. Why do people believe that gaming PC's cost a fortune? Mine's total was $500. And not only that...Valve's games aren't graphically demanding. I used to play TF2 on the PC with a crappy stock graphics card for a long time, and it still looked decent.
        • 1
          Kave En Nov 7, 09
          quote Storm
          Lemme guess, you believe a good gaming rig costs too much? Well until not too long ago, a good gaming PC would cost less than a PS3. Why do people believe that gaming PC's cost a fortune? Mine's total was $500. And not only that...Valve's games aren't graphically demanding. I used to play TF2 on the PC with a crappy stock graphics card for a long time, and it still looked decent.
          If Valve games are the only PC games you play, that's rather sad. Besides, there will come a time when you have to upgrade, and that only adds to the cost. If you wanted a rig to last you three years, you're looking at $700-$1000 which is quite a bit.
        • 2
          Storm Nov 7, 09
          Last me three years? This computer has lasted me 2+ years so far, lol. I can run games like the latest CoD on medium-to-high settings depending on how I play around with it. It's really not as much money as people assume.

          And no I don't only play Valve games on the PC...and how is it sad if I only did? Explain. If I really wanted to upgrade, I can just replace a part or two, I wouldn't have to buy a brand new rig. Then again, a new rig would last longer overall.
      • 4
        RabidChinaGirl Nov 7, 09
        Man, we're talking about Valve games, not Crysis.

        I played Valve games on my 17" Dell Inspiron 9700 for nearly four years. S'not hard. Couldn't have them on max video settings, but you can always pretend they're console-level graphics.
  • 0
    PangTong_Blademaster Nov 7, 09
    Seems to be getting quite a bit of support. Personally, I care not for Valve, but it is tiresome to hear Gabe and the team continuously slagging of the PlayStation 3 and its userbase whenever approached by the media.
  • 2
    DystopiaSticker Nov 7, 09
    Lmao. That was some serious Keith Olbermann over dramatic faggotry.

    ^Of course it can get support, there are a ton of Sonybots out there. And continuously attacking the PS3 fanbase? Are you basing that off of *bleep* over reactions to anything that's not Sony PRAISE like this blog, or actual quotes you can repeat back to me? I mean, WHAT is so insulting about:

    "In hooking up with your friends and the community aspects, I think the Xbox 360 is head and shoulders above the PS3. The 360 and PC are on par, right?"

    THAT is worth this guy freaking out? He hates Valve. He hates Microsoft. This was just the closest thing to a lunching pad he could find. I mean, a guy that says the following about that previous quote:

    "because I'm sure you would be the type of asshole that would look at a Muslim and immediately think “terrorist”, or look at a gay person and immediately think that he would have some contagious disease."

    Just *bleep*ing hates Valve and the people that work there because they dare not support the PS3. This guy is absolutely insane, and not in a cute way. He's legitimately crazy.
  • 4
    Shattered Nov 7, 09
    As much of an asshole comment this is... I'd say it's about right. Xbox Live is still quite a bit more advanced than PSN.
    • 1
      Kave En Nov 7, 09
      quote Shattered
      As much of an asshole comment this is... I'd say it's about right. Xbox Live is still quite a bit more advanced than PSN.
      How? What does LIVE have over PSN? Cross game chat?
      • 3
        Storm Nov 7, 09
        You're really asking this question?...
        • 1
          Kave En Nov 7, 09
          quote Storm
          You're really asking this question?...
          That's about all I can think of. I use both LIVE and PSN and that's all I see, really. Cross game chat.
        • 10
          DystopiaSticker Nov 7, 09
          I don't think logging in to Live at a friends house once every couple of months, screaming obsenities and calling everyone you meet a filthy rotten 360 fanboy who should buy a PS3 counts.
  • 9
    BANDITO ATTACK Nov 7, 09
    i assume this guy has a computer, since he's raging on the interwebs. he should play valves games on that.
    • 3
      RabidChinaGirl Nov 7, 09
      quote BANDITO ATTACK
      i assume this guy has a computer, since he's raging on the interwebs. he should play valves games on that.
      Quoted for *bleep*ing truth.
      • 0
        chautemoc Nov 7, 09
        This is part of the problem I think -- most people don't seem to realize any computer can play most games a few years older than the machine itself (and some recent ones low on requirements, like Valve games). I was like this, then randomly decided to give some semi-recent stuff a go. Really surprised with the results -- turns out my piece of shit integrated card could run Fable, Doom 3, etc. And that's how it started...
  • 2
    FinalFantasyFanaticc Nov 7, 09
    I find some of the comments on that site laughable such as the one saying the only reason Valve don't develop for the PS3 is because their lazy, so i take it the only reason some of the PS3 exclusive developers don't develop for the 360 is because their lazy too then?
  • 0
    Kave En Nov 7, 09
    First off, to Dystopia, I have recently aquired an Xbox 360 via a contest, so I do have a Gold account. Do not assume anything, you only look like a fool when you say such things and do not know the truth.

    Storm, if you only played Valve games on PC you're restricting yourself by not playing some of the other great games on PC. Crysis is a hell of a good game and you'd be missing out on it, WoW is also a highly played game. Why would you penalize yourself by only playing Valve games?
    • 5
      DystopiaSticker Nov 7, 09
      I'm also going to assume that, if indeed you do own a 360 now, that it is huddled in the back corner of your room, covered in a towel, receives daily verbal abuse from you ("why aren't you better, why can't you be like my PS3, Gaylo sucks") and is absolutely covered in feces.
      • 0
        Kave En Nov 7, 09
        quote DystopiaSticker
        I'm also going to assume that, if indeed you do own a 360 now, that it is huddled in the back corner of your room, covered in a towel, receives daily verbal abuse from you ("why aren't you better, why can't you be like my PS3, Gaylo sucks") and is absolutely covered in feces.
        Wrong yet again, though I do play my Ps3 more than my 360. So if that was part of that mini-ramble/insult, yes, that part would be true.
    • 3
      Storm Nov 7, 09
      Crysis is a great game? Really? I've played it, it's an average shooter with amazing graphics...nothing really stood out for me in that game. WoW is P2P, I don't do P2P. GW is where it's at.

      I'm not penalizing myself for only playing Valve games, I have already stated that I play more on the PC than Valve games...but that isn't to say Valve games are bad...every single Valve title I've gotten my hands on have been terrific (from Half-Life, to TF, to L4D, and more). They don't know the meaning of a bad-quality title, heh. And they are arguably one of the best developers around, imo, with the source engine to make it friendly to those without super-computers, free and constant updates and support to their products, etc..

      And Kave En, Dystopia isn't too far off the ball...it's rather common knowledge now that you aren't a fan of M$.
      • 0
        Kave En Nov 7, 09
        quote Storm
        Crysis is a great game? Really? I've played it, it's an average shooter with amazing graphics...nothing really stood out for me in that game. WoW is P2P, I don't do P2P. GW is where it's at.

        I'm not penalizing myself for only playing Valve games, I have already stated that I play more on the PC than Valve games...but that isn't to say Valve games are bad...every single Valve title I've gotten my hands on have been terrific (from Half-Life, to TF, to L4D, and more). They don't know the meaning of a bad-quality title, heh. And they are arguably one of the best developers around, imo, with the source engine to make it friendly to those without super-computers, free and constant updates and support to their products, etc..

        And Kave En, Dystopia isn't too far off the ball...it's rather common knowledge now that you aren't a fan of M$.
        If you play nothing but Valve games you're basically limiting yourself to shooters, and run and gun ones at that. Lots of people have different appeals, limiting yourself like that is foolish.

        I don't like Microsoft, no. But that's not to say the 360 doesn't have good games.
        • 2
          Storm Nov 7, 09
          Well you said it yourself, different appeals, some people just love shooters, it's their favorite game genre. And again, I don't play only Valve games. It's just that their games are always one to be on the lookout for, because they are just that damn good, heh. I mentioned GW for a reason, I play that as well. There's Killing Floor, and I've taken up Diablo 2 again for some fun runs with friends.

          But someone limiting themselves like that isn't foolish, it's what they prefer to do. If I like the shooter genre, what's wrong with just picking up on Valve? It's what you're interested in.
  • 2
    conel3 Nov 7, 09
    haha man the person who wrote that is such a douche.

    Seriously if Valve don't like the PS3 and don't want to develop games for it that doesn't make them rude or assholes it just means they prefer PC and XBOX to PS3. No ammount of pertisions will change how they feel. You'd think that they'd have learnt that after the Left for Dead 2 one.
  • 2
    Kave En Nov 7, 09
    Because it IS foolish to limit yourself to one company. You're dismissing the competition without giving them a chance. Yes people love Valve games, Valve games are good. But so are the other games you listed. So it's not what's wrong with limiting yourself, it's why WOULD you?
    • 2
      Storm Nov 7, 09
      Because that company's titles interest you, and perhaps you don't have too much to spend on games so you go with the style you like, a la Valve. Personally Valve is one company that has never disappointed me with a game yet, so I'd choose a title of theirs if it came to that. Another company I'd trust to trade paper for product is BioWare. Their games are memorable and highly addicting for me. Yes we're limiting ourselves to Shooters/RPGs but there's nothing wrong with sticking behind their style if it keeps us interested enough. Personal preference, these companies stand out to you more than others. Can't speak for everyone, but I assume the reason we play a game or keep up with a hit company's upcoming products is because they drew us in and were fun.
      • 1
        Kave En Nov 8, 09
        quote Storm
        Because that company's titles interest you, and perhaps you don't have too much to spend on games so you go with the style you like, a la Valve. Personally Valve is one company that has never disappointed me with a game yet, so I'd choose a title of theirs if it came to that. Another company I'd trust to trade paper for product is BioWare. Their games are memorable and highly addicting for me. Yes we're limiting ourselves to Shooters/RPGs but there's nothing wrong with sticking behind their style if it keeps us interested enough. Personal preference, these companies stand out to you more than others. Can't speak for everyone, but I assume the reason we play a game or keep up with a hit company's upcoming products is because they drew us in and were fun.
        In contrast to your other post, having a gaming PC and sticking to one company is certainly foolish, because if you're going to sink money into a system, you might as well have it do what it was made to do. Who says you couldn't pay Counter Strike and then go play Roller Coaster Tycoon? Everyone has their favorites, sure. But PC gaming is often recognized as being superior to console gaming, so why would you limit that broad scope?

        That's like buying an Xbox 360 specifically for Halo. They might get a 360 and like Halo, but if you have nothing but Bungie titles in your collection, you've got a whole lot of 2 games for your 360 collection.
        • 4
          RabidChinaGirl Nov 8, 09
          OBJECTION! PCs serve many functions other than gaming that consoles don't, so the comparison is not totally accurate.
        • 1
          Storm Nov 8, 09
          Halo Wars, Halo 3, Halo 3: ODST, I count three games there. Let's not forget the upcoming Halo Reach.

          But yeah, my PC isn't only for playing games, I really just hit up L4D or Borderlands now. I'm just saying that it's up to that person to want to stick to a company's games because they like them. And it's different with Bungie and Valve...Valve has many different games, shooters at base, yes, but completely different. TF2 is nowhere near like L4D, Portal is nothing like Half-Life, so on and so forth. Well, Valve runs Steam, and they have hundreds of games to try from various companies, does that count? xD
    • 2
      RabidChinaGirl Nov 7, 09
      Familiarity, maybe. Same reason why some people eat the same thing at the same restaurant for decades. Doesn't mean they don't like other stuff -- just the familiarity and knowing you'll get what you asked for.

      With Valve, you already have some guarantee it's gonna be a pretty decent or great game, as opposed to a wild card like say... VD-Dev.
  • 0
    Kave En Nov 8, 09
    Halo Wars wasn't developed by Bungie, bro.

    But regardless. I doubt anyone plays only Valve games, so this argument isn't going anywhere.
    • 0
      Storm Nov 8, 09
      Oh, I thought you were talking Halo games that time. Eh, most of what I play on the PC are Valve games.
  • 5
    chautemoc Nov 8, 09
    This was like a group therapy session gone bad.
    • 2
      Mr Gray Nov 8, 09
      Amen.

      And you're all guilty of inspiring Adam Sandler.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.