Star Wars: The Old Republic Loses some Staff
20 hours 3 mins ago
GameZone's Jason Young explores the age demographics of Pokemon and discusses "How Old is Too Old." Does Nintendo's popular franchise have an age limit on how enjoyable it could potentially be?
Perhaps this post isn’t anything more than me venting out my frustrations with people who refuse to understand why I would choose to play Pokemon over something like Call of Duty or World of Warcraft. Or to those who think they’ve outgrown the franchise that they used to love just because they got older.
News story attached to:





Comments
I hate it when people think that just because you grow up means you should quit playing/watching things aimed at kids.
Look at the Donkey Kong Country animated series.I have a DVD of it and the show is clearly aimed at very young children yet I love the show and I'm 26.
There is nothing wrong with having an inner child, in fact it makes like that much more fun.
I doubt many people nearing 100 could play video games,since most of them probably will have arthritis
But having an inner child does make things alot more enjoyable,unless you're talking about the pokemon anime......The way that is now,you'd have to be a child to fully enjoy it
The anime was so much better before Dawn joined the group.
Imagine how much more epic the Pokemon series would have been if Gary was the main character. Now he was a kid who knew how to get shit done.
OH BOY SOMEONE WITH LARGE PINK HAIR NAMED JESSALINA AND A MAN WITH PURPLE HAIR BUT WITH GLASSES AND LOOK A TALKING MEOWTH I SURE HOPE THATS NOT TEAM ROCKET IN DISGUISE!
what the *bleep*? The only good shit is now Jessy doesn't suck as much (during competitions) other than that just watch season 1 and you've watched them all.
Take for example, Platinum - Team Galactic play god, control time and space etc. Or Emerald - Global Warming.
Despite that however, Pokemon's great. Best JRPG ever made.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.