Community Voice is something we do every week at Spawnkill.com where we want to hear from you the reader. This week we discuss Game Length, whether short games are a waste of money or whether longer games give you more bang for your buck. Check it out and lets us know if you agree with some of our comments.

Today, many of us lead busy lives, perhaps with multiple jobs, families, kids, and other hobbies that reduce the amount of time we can spend gaming. As a result, many are drawn to a fun, compact 5-10 hour experience, rather than a 100-hour odyssey that many will never get to complete. According to Murray, only 10-percent of people completed Joe Danger, with average playtime for all those who downloaded it resting at 20-hours. Apparently, most journalists only played about half-way through. Does this mean that Joe Danger is too long? Obviously, Murray doesn’t answer this question, but it’s a valid point to consider. So, what do you think?

theherp80 via spawnkill.com »