Player Affinity pokes a hornet nest with the second installment of this series on alternatives to the big new shooter game. Modern Military versus Space Opera.

"Why play Battlefield 3 when you can play Halo Reach? Why kill innocent human beings who happen to be shooting back at you when you can teabag kill bloodthirsty and ruthless aliens and save the planet…all while looking badass…IN THE FUTURE!"
| More
News story attached to:
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 0
    websod Oct 21, 11
    i take te title personally shooters you should play instead of

    thats just lame. i like the idea of similar games but think that is lame.
  • 1
    Paradox Oct 21, 11
    Iron sights are shit and I'm glad Halo Reach doesn't have it.
  • 0
    websod Oct 22, 11
    @paradox with BF3 and MW3 it is all bout ADS aiming down your sights vi a type of scope or using the guns iron sights

    .. in other words hip firing damage has been reduced and the power of using your sights went up.

    you use iron sights when there is no scope.. the BR in halo has a built in scope.. so there is no need or reason for a iron sight the scope is way better.

    so really that statement is not 100% fair or corrct

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.