119
rate

Are Yearly Released Games Ruining the Single Player Experience?

January 01, 2012 in Blog comments 5

The discussion of yearly iterations has often come up in the game industry. This time the RealGamerNewz writer Deon Lofton brings a modern perspective to the classic debate and adds his own 2 cents while prompting readers to form their own opinions on the issue.

Hitman0769 via realgamernewz.com »
Favourite this article Add source
| More
Report!
News story attached to:

Comments

Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 1
    Red 9 Jan 1, 12
    Lazy developers are ruining single player games.
  • 0
    Deception Jan 3, 12
    I'd be alright with half assed games if the price tag was fitting. Take a note from Halo Anniversary, only $40 at launch ( launch games are usually $100-120 here)
    • 0
      Ded Valve Jan 4, 12
      But halo anniversary wasn't half assed. 343 worked their ass off applying a major graphical overhaul.
      • 0
        Shinobi_razor Jan 4, 12
        but as a remake of a game that was already out, it didnt need to be full price.
  • 0
    Shinobi_razor Jan 3, 12
    only if theyre phoned in *cough*COD*cough*

    other yearly ones like Assassin's Creed i look forward to, as they offer more fun climbing, stealthiness, parkour and killing in fun ways and introduce new stuff each time. really loved being able to have your own assassins in Brotherhood and the new bomb mechanic in Revelations. and each new AC manages to feel pretty polished IMO.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.