PSN to SEN: Time to rage quit? - DarkFeed
18 hours 4 mins ago
A new rating system will be used for games, with lights and numbers instead of letters. If the game has a green light, it is suitable for anyone to play. If it is orange, then it is more suited for teenagers, and if it has a red light, it should be played by people ages 16+. Refer to the picture attached for a better understanding.
The games industry is close to launching a traffic light system for the ratings on games. If you don't know what we're talking about, look at the coloured charts on back of that pork pie packet you've just thrown in the bin.
Basically, the new system will offer parents 'at a glance' indicators of a game's appropriateness for their child.
A green label on a game's packaging will mean said title's likely to be fine for kids of all ages, an orange one will mean parental guidance is needed, and a red label will mean a game's definitely not fit for your toddler (see image below).
It's just like the coloured label system you find on food wrappers warning you that too many fish fingers will give you a heart attack, or that too much booze will see you sleep in a park.
Additional sources:
- via videogamer.com
- via kotaku.com
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Oct 30, 2008
Most recently commented on by on Oct 30, 2008








Comments
Some parents STILL buy there kids 18 games and then complain afterwards about it being violent.
Something as simple as this would be a good addition in my book as it puts MORE responsibility to the parents which is always good in an industry constantly being blamed by stupid parents who cant read.
Although I've noticed they have replaced the 15 rating with a 16 rating, Not to worry anyway, Means more "Teen" games can be a bit more less restrictive now.
But for some reason I can still picture parents screwing up with this as well. But I suppose its to be expected.
If they've made such a push that a new system will be implemented, then surely they can raise their own godamn kids without the state interfering to such an extent.
That is ridiculous.
It'd take me a few minutes just to figure out what they mean.
No, the ratings are the ages and the reason for the rating are the images above (like dice for gambling or the syringe for drug-use).
Cussing is 3+......LMFAO Jesus WTF they teach cussing first as the national language?!
For example, this game was given a rating of 7+, the reason for this rating is that it may be scary for young children (as denoted by the spider).
I say we just apply the MPAA movie ratings for video games:
E: G
E+: PG
T: PG-13
M: R
and why is there 2 PG's? that system looks stupid.
Haha, that does sound a bit confusing I suppose. Maybe they should just simplify things by having the lowest recommended age for the game "0+" would mean everyone is good to play, "13+" would be teens, "18+" would be adults, and "21+" would be the extreme things like our "AO" rating.
Now we have
G
PG (formerly PG 15+)
M (formerly M 15+)
MA 15+
R 17+
(besides ADULT)
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.