Download God of War III Blood & Metal EP for Free
8 hours 18 mins ago
I can't figure out why this guy thinks Microsoft owes him $50,000 for scratching a few games, but still interesting that a court case is forcing them to reveal certain things they may have not wished to.
Documents unsealed in his court case revealed Microsoft discovered its Xbox 360 could scratch discs before it went on sale in 2005, and even got as far as considering three possible solutions to the problem, the Seattle Tech Report revealed today.
The characteristic circular scratches can occur whenever the orientation of the console -- which is designed to be used in either a horizontal or vertical position -- is changed while the drive is spinning. Johnson filed his suit after his console scratched three store-bought game discs, and is seeking $50,000 in punitive damages.
Testimony obtained from a Microsoft program manager indicates that Microsoft became aware of the problem months before the 360's launch when retail demonstration consoles malfunctioned. The company examined three solutions: strengthening the magnets that hold the discs in place, slowing the rotational speed of the discs, and installing rubber bumpers to cushion the discs, but rejected them all. Installing the bumpers could have cost as little as $0.50 per console, the suit claims.
It's not the first time Microsoft has come under fire for alleged foreknowledge of Xbox 360 hardware issues, either. Back in September, an expose penned by VentureBeat writer Dean Takahashi claimed systemic failures in Microsoft's design and quality assurance processes lead to the Xbox 360's now-infamous overheating "Red Ring of Death" failures.
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Dec 22, 2008
Most recently commented on by on Dec 22, 2008







Comments
EDIT: Actually Final Blade, I think you might have a point. After all, it's not MS fault that he bought the console in the first place.
Some people will sue over anything these days. Now if your console catches fire and burns your house down, then you would have a good reason to sue.
Companies like it or not are required to make products that don't cause avoidable damage. By intentionally ignoring a known failure in their product Microsoft simply invited a lawsuit. The reason they don't get sued for the RROD is because they addressed that problem.
I guess good consoles always have problems.
Still the discs wouldn't be scratch if people actually took care of your system and game. Oh and using the hot coffee statement is ridiculous. Who's fault is it if you spilled hot coffee on your lap? Are you going to sue the Coffee shop for making it too hot and causing you to spill it? Honestly that's ridiculous Koloth. I mean shit happens, but suing MS for this is just over the top.
You can't expect perfection in any console, even the PS3 has issues and so does Wii.
Which means it warns you about games before playing it. Which means MS told people about that when you first got your system, which means this whole suing MS for this is ridiculous and pretty much going to back fire. I never said you can't sue anyone for anything, but it actually succeeding and it making sense is different.
Also, he's suing for much more than three games are worth. What, is he claiming emotional distress or something? -_-
On the other hand the case isn't so much about money as about proving that Micrsoft knowingly released a sub par product.
The rubber bumper idea would've been kinda nice though.
We can't have it perfect anyways, this guy is being a dramatic douchebag.
I have one thing to say to this guy though, disc repairs. They cost so little.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.