In rather interesting news, Stephen Totilo has confirmed that Sony charges publishers for DLC.

This could be the reason why Xbox 360 receives demos of games that are multiplatform, such as Activision's Guitar Hero Metallica and Call of Duty World at War.

MTV Multiplayer has verified that a letter sent to publishers last fall detailed the policy. It applies a 16-cent charge to every Gigabyte of content downloaded from the PS3’s PSN online store. For free content, like demos, those charges apply only during the first 60 days of the content’s release. For paid content, like map packs, the charges rack up in perpetuity, or until that content is removed from the PlayStation 3’s online store.

This “PlayStation Network Bandwidth” fee has been unpopular with game companies, according to at least three publishing and development sources who spoke to MTV Multiplayer about the policy on the condition of anonymity so as not to get their companies on Sony’s bad side.

“It definitely makes us think about how we view the distribution of content related to our games when it is free for us to do it on the web, on Xbox Live, or any other way — including broadcast — than on Sony’s platform,” one publishing source said. “It’s a new thing we have to budget. It’s not cool. It sucks.”

Publishers already pay costs for creating a demo, a process that can run six figures. Sony’s fees add a new expense. For a demo that is sized at exactly 1GB and is downloaded one million times, that would add an extra $160,000 that Sony is now charging and that, according to publishing sources, Microsoft isn’t. That’s what could scare publishers from placing content on the PS3.
| More
News story attached to:
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Mar 21, 2009
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 0
    redneonfish Mar 20, 09
    Nice one Sony, good going there
  • 0
    Fatal Error Mar 20, 09
    Well it's either that or start charging the users. The money to support those servers doesn't come out of thin air, you know.

    I don't particularly like the idea of charging publishers for free content, though.
  • 0
    Shattered Mar 20, 09
    Wow Sony, no wonder why everyone hates you this generation. If Microsoft can do this without getting developers/publishers to pay a bloody fee to have their content on the XBL marketplace then why the hell can't you?

    This also probably explains why Sony doesn't have a very large variety of games... I honestly can't believe this crap.
    • 2
      PacoDG Mar 20, 09
      Really I think this just explains why I pay $50 a year for XBL. But, on the other hand, do gamers need demos?
      • 2
        Shattered Mar 20, 09
        I'm coming more and more around to the idea of trading in my PS3 for a 360 every day now. The only thing that's really stopping me is those rare few exclusives that I can't give up on.

        This is exactly the stuff that Sony shouldn't be doing, they've basically screwed themselves even more.
        • 0
          BlackLabel Mar 20, 09
          Haha... You do know the reason Microsoft don't charge developers is because they charge the customer instead. What would you prefer, someone else fronting the cost for your wonderful demo's and content or yourself fronting the cost of these demo's and content, i mean on Live even if you don't buy the content you are paying for it's server space in some way.
      • 2
        RabidChinaGirl Mar 20, 09
        quote PacoDG
        Really I think this just explains why I pay $50 a year for XBL.
        Well put.

        I personally like having demos. I don't download every single one out there, but it's a good option for sure. And honestly, people pay more money for MMOs, so I don't mind Gold's annual $50 fee... not that I'd mind a drop, either.
        • 0
          chautemoc Mar 21, 09
          Demos are one of the best things to happen to the gaming industry, in my opinion.
    • 1
      Red 9 Mar 21, 09
      quote Shattered
      Wow Sony, no wonder why everyone hates you this generation. If Microsoft can do this without getting developers/publishers to pay a bloody fee to have their content on the XBL marketplace then why the hell can't you?

      This also probably explains why Sony doesn't have a very large variety of games... I honestly can't believe this crap.
      Fap fap fap fap I hate Sony fap fap fap...
  • 0
    Shattered Mar 20, 09
    True, I guess. Maybe Sony should do that. I know a lot of people would go ballistic over it, but if they really are making their own XBL-like service then it would make sense to have us to pay a small fee for it. Not like $60.000, maybe half or even a quarter or less of that.
  • 0
    RabidChinaGirl Mar 20, 09
    Nice find with this one. Have to say I wasn't expecting it... I can see how this might dissuade publishers from issuing DLC to PSN. The policy was just implemented in October, so I'm curious if we'll be seeing the effects in 2009?
  • 0
    Delta787 Mar 20, 09
    hah good find mate weird that
  • 0
    Storm Mar 21, 09
    It's only a few extra dollars for DLC anyway. And it's not a mandatory purchase, it's completely up to us to get it or not...but meh, I like XBL's style more in that sense.
  • 0
    Sayyed Mar 21, 09
    From the sounds of its, pretty cheap. I think these companies can afford 16 cents per gig. And most things don't even reach 1 gig.
    • 1
      Slumpy monkey Mar 21, 09
      16 cents for every gig of their content downloaded. That stuff adds up, just like a 16 cents rise in petrol would add up.

      Although, PSN users don't pay a fee so its obvious why they do it.

      Typical robin hood scenario, stealing from the rich giving to the "so called" poor.
      • 2
        Storm Mar 21, 09
        But chances are, if you own a PS3, you're not exactly poor now are you?
        • 1
          Slumpy monkey Mar 21, 09
          Yeah you will be because you spent it all on the PS3 and upgrading it with a 500gig hdd you don't need.
          *waits for someone to ruin the joke*
  • 1
    Red 9 Mar 21, 09
    As if Sony didn't have enough bad press already. By the end of the generation, Sony's gonna be as hated as Jack Thompson. Not only do they seem to have no ability to manage their game library properly, but they charge the people who make their games to make addons.

    When is Sony gonna learn that being stupid doesn't pay off?

    [/spur-of-the-moment rant]
    • 2
      Bale Fire Mar 21, 09
      Stupid? Sony basically has three choices with this, do it as they are now, charging the publishers. They could charge us, eliminating one of the main advantages their online network has. Or they could stomach the bill, sapping millions from their budget which could be used to make more games, updates and DLC. It's a tough choice, and I'm not exactly liking the policy, but it would seem the right decision to Sony financially. Because this hate would be nothing compared to the bashing they would receive if they started charging for PSN.
      • 3
        Seeker X Mar 21, 09
        quote
        Because this hate would be nothing compared to the bashing they would receive if they started charging for PSN.
        Damned if you do...

        "Jeezus, you guys are MORONS!"

        "You wanna pay for this shit instead?"

        "No"

        "Then *bleep*."
        • 2
          Fatal Error Mar 21, 09
          Yeah no shit man. I'm getting a good laugh at people like Shattered apparently smashing Sony for this when the reasons are really quite clear. Like I said, those servers and that bandwidth isn't free, and the costs certainly aren't being recouped by membership fees, so it needs to come from somewhere.
  • 1
    Existence Mar 21, 09
    Dudes, Sony charges the companies, Microsoft charges its users. Either way, its pretty much the same.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.