GameSpot has been bullshit long before PS3 came out. They have always been bullshit.

K&L has gotten a general review score of about 65%-69%. For him to review the game as a 6.0 hardly means he "wasn't right." Furthermore, how can one be "right" with a review? A review is one's own perceptions and opinion of the product at hand, not a generalized recap based on what the mainstream thinks.

But yeah, I doubt he'll have much trouble finding another site to work for. If anything, this whole debacle has really gotten his name out there, being that most fans are on his side now.

Dine that wasn't the point, which seems Dezvous said most have missed. The fact is, he is a Professional Reviewer correct, yes?
Than do you do realize that Professional reviews are supposed to review and rate the game with unbiased look, and Explain in writing why it got rated as such. You know the good about the game and the bad, fact is the bad part has never been correct ever on IGN or gamespot. Its not the Score i have a problem with is why, in his own professional review on the game, why it got the scores it did. And like i stated before and Dez, and guticb they never do that.

Here's an example PS3 version of Ghost Recon got 8.5 while the 360 version got 8.7. Thats ok the problem with that was they stated because new people who own a PS3 won't understand the game story line, since its a last gen game series. You cannot rate games based off that, its ridiculous.
The next one was something like lack of Multi-player or something, again not a good reason to rate the game which was technically the Superior Version 2 points down from the 360. That game was the superior version and has been claim by the Developers as such yet they get this biased reviews, which gave the 360 higher score.
Thats the whole problem which you didn't read my comment in the thread in lounging which i stated 3 times. Its not the number thats the problem its the so called professional Review that gets lost in the sauce. No where in there is supposed to be your opinion. Not only that those reviewers rush playing the game to meet a dead-line you can't do that with games, that will lead to bad scores which the PS3 has gotten plenty of those.

Ghost Recon is one example you've managed to give me. I gave you 10 in that Loungin' thread. Also, lack of multi-player for many people is reason enough to rate a game two points less. Infact, here's a list of all the review sites/magazines who gave GRAW2 a lower score on the PS3 than the 360, courtesy of GameRankings:

1UP
Da GameBoyz
Extreme Gamer
Game Informer
Game Over Online
GameAlmighty
GamePro
GamingExcellence
NZGamer
Pelit

And that's not including IGN and GameSpot. But hey, I guess they're all just dirty Microsoft-loyalists, right?

I'm going to go ahead and restate this, though: this has NOTHING to do with Jeff Gerstmann being fired. GRAW2 isn't even reviewed by him. You are bringing up a subject which is completely separate from this one. I'm not even going to ask how it relates to him, because it is clear to me that you are simply using this event to launch off your conspiracy theories about video game review sites conspiring against the PS3.

Although I will agree that game reviews probably are mostly all rushed, trying to meet a deadline. So all professional reviews, to an extent, need to be read with a pinch of salt.

Those ten was just scores i don't care for the number don't you read, i dont care if its 8.9, i want to know what the reason is and what the bad of the game and good of the game to match the score. All you gave me was numbers what does that prove.

It has to do with the fact justice is being served and now Gamespot are deserving this controversy they just made, This has nothing to do with Eidos just cause they threaten to take out there ads means very little in jeff's job. He did something stupid and paid for it. And its not just Ghost recon Please PM guticb or DEZVOUS and they will tell you how they always don't explain why they rate them badly and they do it for the wrong reasons. Im done replying you obviously are missing the point.