21 hours 19 mins ago
174
Game Sequels We Want To See Happen
72
11 Games That Capture the Essence of America
11 hours 58 mins ago
66
Best Buy's PS3 bundle comes with Metal Gear Solid 4 and Killzone 2
20 hours 29 mins ago
57
Wii MotionPlus makes big spash in Japan
21 hours 18 mins ago
38
Xbox 360 set to Replace Sky Boxes?
17 hours 26 mins ago
35
The Bender Podcast - Transformers testes, Torrents, and The Conduit
11 hours 5 mins ago
35
Take a Gander at NIS' PS3 Exclusive RPG, Last Rebellion
9 hours 48 mins ago
31
How Many Beatles Songs Should Go Into the New Beatles: Rock Band ?
15 hours 13 mins ago

Submit a Story
Register
Get Started
Webmaster Tools



Bethesda don't hate the PS. It's about business, MS shove the money under their noses they'll be only too happy to give exclusive dlc. Think about it, they've been creating games for PC, Xbox longer than they have for PS3, so in some respect their relationship with MS would be better. I'm sure if Sony shoved more money under Bethesda's nose, they'd be only too happy to produce exclusive dlc for the PS.
Yeah, Sony doesn't pay extra, like MS does, for exclusive content. It's the same as it was for GTA IV....
Its what I do for most games.
The older games are harder to get into, and Metal Gear Solid hasn't aged all that well, but all of them are still great games.
Its got 2009 GotY locked up.
Yeah sure PS3 didn't get DLC for Oblivion...Sony's fault not Beth Soft's. Sony and Beth Soft were arguing about DLC way before PS3 was even released...Sony turned it all away and Beth Soft decided it wasn't worth the hassle to chase them.
Anyway, I have GoW 1 and 2 on the shelf waiting to be played right now...from the hour I played already of GoW 1, I am liking it...so with that and a recommendation from my favourite developers...GoW 3 means business and hopefully will be sony's and PS3's saviour
Last I checked, the PS3 was doing just fine without a "saviour", with arguably the best 2008 lineup and fantastic sales compared to the Xbox360. But ok...
Don't get me wrong...some spanking games but there is a different air and feel to the PS3 unlike there was with the PSX and PS2. What I mean by that is the fact that PS2 no matter what they were up against, always had the backing of Sony 200%. The PS2 is pretty much undoubtedly the most successful console made, the titles upon it range across all genres tenfold.
The PS3 however feels like the lazy assed half-brother sponging off the more successful brother's fame and fortune, it has graphics, it has power but not a "whole lot processing in the head" if you catch my drift. In fact it is more orientated towards the FPS/Action & Adventure types, what with Unchartered, Haze, Time Shift, CoD4 & 5, Stranglehold, Unreal Tournament III, Rainbow Six: Las Vegas 1 & 2 and whatever else you crazy kids play these days.
What does RPG genre have? Bethesda Softworks more or less, which Sony pushes away idiotically and towards their rivals. So you have Fallout 3 and Oblivion....then you have Untold Legends, which I do play once in a blue moon but 60% of the PS3 population dislike it or never played it. Then you have Enchanted Arms which is in the same situation as Untold Legends.
My point? Although GoW isn't a RPG, it is still set firmly within the "fantasy" section that I prefer to dwell in. It is a refresher from all the gun wielding FPS and Action Adventures, ok it switches guns with swords but throwing a mixture about wouldn't hurt Sony one bit
It's a new age. Everything's more powerful, but conversely harder to develop for.
*knocks on wood*
I pray that doesn't happen though.
Gameplay is already perfect, so doesn't need any changes. All they have to do is bulk up the graphics, flesh out the storyline, and add a few other bits and pieces here and there. Just give the already perfect series a next-gen makeover, basically.
Praise for a PS3 game from Bethesda? What are they delirious?