Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  3 thumbs!

  Fatal Error | June 10, 2008
  A quote from the source would've been seriously useful.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Final Blade | June 10, 2008
  _{I didn't want to quote from the source since there wouldn't be much left after I had quoted it. Besides your supposed to read the source anyway.}
  • 
    3 thumbs!

    Fatal Error | June 10, 2008
    That's the most *bleep*ed reason I've ever heard. You put a quote from the source to make things easier. News Articles aren't meant to be your personal blogs; you report the news, add a quote, and that's it. Who cares if there wouldn't be much left for you to post afterwards? That's how it's supposed to be.
    • 
      -2 thumbs!

      Final Blade | June 10, 2008
      _{Thats not how I was told by Enhance. The point is to give people a little taste of the source while readers are supposed to go on the source to read the rest. Since there wouldn't be much point if I did it that way, I just left it blank for you to read. I gave my summary on the article, and its your job to read the source. Plenty of people have done what I've done before. Its nothing new.}
      • 
        1 thumbs!

        Donnelly | June 10, 2008
        Final Blade, how many times were you dropped on your head as a child?
      • 
        0 thumbs!

        Final Blade | June 10, 2008
        _{Don read my post, this is how I was told to do the articles.
        Don, Moonrise, submit your articles since you seem to know how to do it.}
      • 
        1 thumbs!

        Fatal Error | June 10, 2008
        I find that hard to believe considering almost every legitimate article I've seen actually contains quotes from the source. GG, seriously.
        
        Also, I don't have any articles to submit.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  bbb7002004 | June 10, 2008
  It would be better if the title was a bit clearer. This is another of Patcher's predictions, not based on actual numerical figures. Those won't be out until the end of the week.
  • 
    -2 thumbs!

    Final Blade | June 10, 2008
    _{The title is clear though, and its pretty apparent that GTA4 didn't sell a sufficient amount of consoles for either system as everyone thought.}
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      Akira_EX | June 10, 2008
      Alot of people say it, but without the actual NPD, which doesn't come out until Thursday, there's no true confirmation. I have to agree with bbb, this is still a prediction.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Storm | June 10, 2008
  I don't see why a multiplatform title would sell consoles, especially when...correct me if I'm wrong, there was no GTAIV bundle pack?
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    slumpy monkey | June 10, 2008
    There were GTA bundle packs on both consoles, at least in the UK it was advertised so.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Blackfalcon | June 10, 2008
  You would think it would have helped, but most people already had a PS3 or Xbox 360 by then, and they weren't going to buy a different console to play a game that they could play on their existing console.