113

Atari suing Gaming Sites for giving Alone in the Dark bad reviews?

Gothic Girl | June 20, 2008 | News | Playstation 2 Playstation 3 
Rumors are spreading around the 'net that illegal copies of Alone in the Dark have recently been leaked. Many European game sites have already got their hands on copies of the game, and have been rather harsh with their review scores, most of which range from 3/10 to 6/10.
Atari hasn't taken too kindly to this, and are threatening legal action against these sites for having pirated copies of the game. However it seems only game sites who have given Alone in the Dark negative reviews have reported being targetted by Atari. How very fishy ...
Scandinavian games site GameReactor (The Norwegian edition specifically) were one of the first to review Alone in the Dark. They gave it 3/10. Ouch. However, they then promptly pulled the review, and accusations of shady dealings were levelled against the site by Atari, who said that press copies had only been sent out the day before (the review has since been reinstated, and the 3/10 stands). Odd, seeing as many other European publications also had reviews go live this week.

German site 4Players reviews the game. Gives it 68%. Then is threatened with legal action by Atari because, yes, Atari had no idea how the site got a copy of the game.

Tor-Steinar Nastad Tangedal, from Norwegian site Gamer.no, has contacted us with a similar story. He writes (though without proof we're unable to confirm this):

quote
Gamer.no was the second publication in the world to publish a review, and we also gave it 3 out of 10. The review was based on a retail copy obtained from a store on Tuesday this week. Atari contacted us just minutes after it was published, claiming that our review is probably based on a preview or pirated copy, and requested it to be removed. We never removed it, of course.

It's interesting that Atari are so worried about publications securing their own copy of a game. Do they fear that, because these outlets may have received copies of the game "early" (ie from pirated copies), that they're somehow reviewing incomplete code, which could affect their opinion of the game? Maybe.
Pessimists could, however, be forgiven for thinking it's a convenient excuse for Atari to attack negative reviews of the only game they're releasing in 2008 that has any chance of making them some money.

News Story attached to:
Related Articles
85 Top 11 Gaming Sites (4)comments September 17, 2008
153 Top 5 Upcoming Gaming Sites (18)comments September 4, 2008
67 Gaming Sites are Getting Annoyed at the Lack of Fatal Frame IV hype (3)comments July 10, 2008
233 Six reasons The Dark Knight: The Game would be a bad idea. (17)comments July 23, 2008
68 GV Reviews Battlefield: Bad Company (0)comments July 15, 2008
Register as a member to subscribe comments.

Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

  • 0 thumbs!
    Mnmfan | June 20, 2008
    So what sites are Atari not targetting because they gave it a good score then?
  • -1 thumbs!
    Final Blade | June 21, 2008
    ......Sounds like Kane and Lynch all over again. Which I disagree on the scores completely. It was a good game I would rate it 7.5-8/10.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Sereph | June 21, 2008
      That's not the point. The Gamespot scandal was based on a website's advertising revenue being affected by a negative review, not a developer getting their panties in a bunch over some bad scores.
  • 1 thumbs!
    On Vacation | June 21, 2008
    if they don't want bad scores, they shouldn't make bad games. thats the be-all end all of it, really.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.

Submit Newshelp
(0.0984/d/aeon)