Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  0 thumbs!

  slumpy monkey | July 03, 2008
  ... No its not true.
  
  Bungie have stated MANY times that halo is over and they want to move onto different projects.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Drogo Baggins | July 03, 2008
    That doesn't mean they're not making it. Companies lie sometimes, if you can believe that.
    
    I hope it is in developement. Oh, and I'm loving the fake BoxArt. I think that looks pretty awesome.
    • 
      -1 thumbs!

      slumpy monkey | July 04, 2008
      Why would they lie like that, Market halo 3 as a lie and not even leak a tiny piece of legitimate info at all?
      • 
        -1 thumbs!

        Drogo Baggins | July 05, 2008
        I'm pretty sure Halo "3" has been leaked, lol. you may want to edit your comment.
        
        Anyway, there are various reasons why they wouldn't want to say anything about Halo 4. They could be unsure whether they're yet ready to commit to it yet, and don't want to say anything becasue all that would do is get people's expectations up.
        
        If I were developing Halo 4, I'd wait until I was pretty far into developing the game, just so I'd have something solid to show people soon.
        
        They're just going to piss people off if they say they're developing it now, and then end up not having snything to show for a long time, so why wouldn't they wait to say something about it?
      • 
        0 thumbs!

        slumpy monkey | July 07, 2008
        I never said Halo 3 wasnt leaked, Read my post, I was talking about not leaking about halo 4.
        
        They have even strait out denied it. If it were true they would say "no comment" Not "Bungie has been working on Halo for too long, we feel its time to give cheif a rest and go onto a new series."
      • 
        -1 thumbs!

        Drogo Baggins | July 10, 2008
        You clearly said "Halo 3".
        
        
        

        quote

        Why would they lie like that, Market halo 3 as a lie and not even leak a tiny piece of legitimate info at all?

        The least you could do is edit your comment and not just lie about what you said.
      • 
        0 thumbs!

        slumpy monkey | July 10, 2008
        I said Market halo 3 as a lie, When I was talking about leaking info I was talking about HALO 4. Me talking about halo 3 ended when I said why would they market it as a lie.
      • 
        -1 thumbs!

        Drogo Baggins | July 10, 2008
        Lol, okay, stop trying to *bleep* with my head....
        
        

        quote slumpy monkey
        

        I said Market halo 3 as a lie, When I was talking about leaking info I was talking about HALO 4. Me talking about halo 3 ended when I said why would they market it as a lie.

        quote slumpy monkey
        

        Why would they lie like that, Market halo 3 as a lie and not even leak a tiny piece of legitimate info at all?

        Are you insane, or can you just not understand what you, yourself wrote?
        
        If you started talking about Halo 4, maybe you should've actually mentioned it, or said something about it in a different sentence. When you say it like that, you're still talking about your original subject, which was Halo 3.
        
        I'll buy you "Hooked on Phonics" someday
        
        You made a typo, I joked about it, get over it.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Mnmfan | July 04, 2008
  Bandito why did you tick the Playstation 3 box when submitting the article?
  The PS3 Forum doesn't need 360 news in the sidebar. That's just childish.
  I don't care about Halo.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Red 9 | July 04, 2008
  Beating a dead horse if true. Halo Wars, Halo Chronicles and then Halo 4 would be a little much.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  TurMoiL911 | July 04, 2008
  If Bungie has any sense in them, THEY WILL NOT DEVELOP A HALO 4.
  
  I liked how Halo 3 ended. It was the perfect fitting to the storyline. Creating a Halo 4 would be *bleep*ing up a great storyline with a random-ass reason to bring it back.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Red 9 | July 04, 2008
    They would if MS paid them enough.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Twisted | July 04, 2008
    Lemme say something, would you rather ending a series because the storyline fits, or having a new kickass game in the series with a storyline that isn't perfect?
    I know I haven't ever played Halo, and am probably missing something, but that's just what I wanted to say.
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      TurMoiL911 | July 04, 2008
      Yeah, I would rather have them end it out when the storyline fits fine, not before they beat the Halo horse dead.
      
      Look at it from the storywriter's perspective: if you wrap up a storyline nicely, why ruin it with a sequel ? It's like J.K. Rowling writing an eighth Harry Potter book.
      • 
        -2 thumbs!

        Final Blade | July 05, 2008
        <sub>The only problem with your assumption is that after Halo 1 Halo 2 and 3 had great storyline and ending. Thats laughable in itself. halo 2 ruined the story for Halo 1 and halo 3 just added to it. Halo at its core never was about Story or single player, it was all about Multiplayer online, thats where it shined most. And thats what Halo fans will remember it for, not for its horrendous storyline.
        
        Donnelly post makes more sense, this would make it seem that a 4 one is realistic, however given how Bungie stated halo series is over, meaning they won't make a 4th one, I don't see this being true.</sub>
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Donnelly | July 04, 2008
  Halo 3 spoilers ahead:
  
  
  
  At the end of the legendary ending Master Chief says "Wake me when you need me."
  
  I thought that made it obvious they'd make a sequel when they were needed.
  • 
    1 thumbs!

    OkamiAlucard | July 04, 2008
    So i'm not the only one who thought of that. No doubt they have a few people working on it currently but their not going to focus on it until they want to or until their about to go under.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  HisServant77 | July 04, 2008
  I don't think I'd like that. Halo 3's storyline seemed . . . empty compared to the other ones. I think if they milked another game off the storyline like that, it'd be dry and kinda ruin the name of the series. But, if they can do it right, BETTER than the Halo 3 for sure, then hey it'd be great. I doubt it though.
  
  Besides, I don't think they'll go against their word when they said no more in the series storyline.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Seproth | July 04, 2008
  ITT: people claim to know Bungie's plans.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Fishlock | July 04, 2008
  I think that Bungie would make a remake of Marathon rather than make a Halo 4.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  cbjones | July 04, 2008
  What happened to Bungie being tired of making Halo? I thought Chief was going to have a good long while to rest before a new adventure.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  BANDITO ATTACK | July 04, 2008
  "Looks like we're getting close to getting are hands on halo 4."
  
  cough-hack-choke-die
• 
  2 thumbs!

  Bunnyburn | July 05, 2008
  In terms of the games storyline and whatnot, Halo 4 would be horrible. But from an economic standpoint, it seems inevitable. Halo 4 WOULD rake in some cash. Everyone who bought Halo 3 would probably get Halo 4. Games aren't about quality anymore, it's about having a popular title on the box art.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Storm | July 06, 2008
  Haha...what's up with all the people speaking for Bungie...as if they worked there? It can happen, there is that possibility, there's ALWAYS that possibility.
  
  As Bunnyburn mentioned, Bungie and Microsoft can cash in on a possible sequel. Think of it this way, if they lost a good deal of money trying out different things, who would they turn to? Perhaps they'll need to wake someone up, like ljp said.
  
  Truth is, as much as it's bashed around Neo and such, Halo is a well-successful series. There's always a possibility of a Halo 4, MGS5...so on and so forth.
• 
  -1 thumbs!

  pwned227 | July 06, 2008
  well this could go two ways the game could be made and people would be happy even if it sucked or the game would not be mad and people would forever hate bungi...after they beat halo wars.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Bandito | July 06, 2008
    maybe. i don't think there done with halo yet.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  dragoshi1 | July 10, 2008
  *crosses fingers*
  
  Please no covenant,please no covenant,please no Arbiter,please no tiresome maps that look the same...
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    slumpy monkey | July 10, 2008
    What so all you want is the shitty flood?
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      dragoshi1 | July 11, 2008
      The flood are screwed and,if it's HALO 4,obviously there will be more flood
  • 
    -1 thumbs!

    Storm | July 11, 2008
    Huh, just what was wrong with The Arbiter?
  • 
    -3 thumbs!

    TurMoiL911 | July 11, 2008
    If you paid attention to the storyline in Halo 3, you'd realize that the Covenant no longer exists.
    • 
      1 thumbs!

      dragoshi1 | July 12, 2008
      They still exist,they just are not "evil" anymore.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Solid Snake 4Life | July 12, 2008
  I'm pretty positive that somebody in Halo said the destruction of the last Halo you destroy would not stop the flood just slow it down. And the ending of Halo 3 legendary obviously showd a new Halo will come out sometime.
  And to the post above me, I'm pretty positive that the Brutes would be pissed off at the killing of the prophet.