Games We Love but Wish We Could Love Playing
8 hours 14 mins ago
According to Don Mattrick he believes that Halo, "the number one game in the world," is so big that it not only can't be shown on E3 but needs a single-event all by itself. It seems like Microsoft likes to tick their competition off.
In a recent interview, Microsofts Senior Vice President of Interactive Entertainment, Don Mattrick, responded to Bungies public disagreement with the companys decision to put off their E3 Halo announcement. Mattrick was quoted saying:
One of the things that we decided, when you have the number one game in the world as we have in Halo, its a safe prediction that if we do a separate event for Halo, that itll be well-attended, well covered





Comments
E3 is the outlet that let this news out. If anything, E3 is the only place big enough to annonce something like this.
I apolopgise for the rant but it does annoy me so, when people bring up Halo as this god like franchise when all it has done is rode on the waves of better and more innovative franchises, it is the cancer of the industry, because of it better games are brought down by Halo fans who half of which of the scum of the gaming planet, they know basic online ettiquette and have a rather limited knowledge of real and skillful shooters, i digress Halo is a fun game but not i repeat NOT the best and certainly doesn't deserve the title.
I think the reason why it wasn't shown at E3 was the simple reason that it would have made them a laughing stock, the game would not have lived up to the standards that show set in terms of games i mean that show hosted the likes of Fallout 3, LittleBigPlanet, Gears of War 2, Fable 2, Resistance 2, Killzone 2 and other amazing title, if it was another Halo that would have gotten claps but the game would have probably looked a mess in comparison to the other games shown at the show. Hell when even Halobots think Halo 3 was a dissapointment then Halo 4 or whatever this announcement was won't turn as many heads...
I actually do like Halo, I think they're really fun games. But I definitely don't think they're very well made. I think that the controls are the one thing that could be said are amazing about the Halo series.
You may disagree, but I honestly think Halo has some of the best controls I've ever seen. Probably the best of any FPS, IMO. I think it just feels so natural. You can fall right into it and land softly.
I think that Halo seems terrible to some people just because of all the hype. I don't think it lives up to the hype, personally. I honestly kid of wish all reviewers and critics said that all three games were crap, just so gamers wouldn't expect the game to be absolutely amazing in every way.
It could've been a sleeper-hit. I honestly think it's turned out to be more of a generic shooter, though, because of high expectations.
While I think every game with the name Halo besides Combat Evolved was a failure. Resistance and Killzone shouldn't be considered better. The original Killzone was mediocre. Resistance was good but it did less than Halo did as far as moving the genre forward.
Example they weren't the first to have vehicles. However, after Halo almost every FPS does. They did it right, and made it a staple of the genre.
And I meant that now it's hard to move the genre forward today because it's nearing the point where you can't add anything new that won't just feel like a gimmick.
Wait... Since when did Microsoft get Chrono Trigger or Final Fantasy VII?
Brawl was easily more hyped than Halo, and it failed pretty horribly. Why aren't more people bashing that? Everywhere I go, I just hear "Halo sux olol" or "itz generic shooter." People just need to *bleep* up and start judging games on the things they do right and not what they do wrong.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.