Call of Duty Black Ops Voted ‘Best Game Ending’ Of All Time
14 hours 14 mins ago
From what began from the 360 fans, where they gave Little Big Planet pretty much the lowest ratings they can give it, the PS3 owners strike back at the same website but to their beloved Gears of War 2 game, but most of you already know this.
Now another game has fell victim as an act of vengeance from the 360 owners. The highly anticipated FPS (First Person Shooter) Resistance 2.
How will the PS3 fans strike back? Fable 2 is already on a 6.4 user rating although that game is already released worldwide. Gears of War 2 is still stuck at a killer 2.7 rating.
When will it end? Shortly after we talked to Metacritic founder Marc Doyle about LittleBigPlanets low user score, the wrath of Sony fanboys was unleashed upon Gears of War 2s user score as a revenge hit. It now appears that the 360 fanboys just wouldnt stand for that, even though they seem to have started this in the first place, and have retaliated by butchering Resistance 2.
News story attached to:
Additional sources:
- Metacrtitic Resistance 2 (metacritic.com)
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Oct 28, 2008
Most recently commented on by on Oct 28, 2008









Comments
Anyway that's why you read reviews. At least watch them.
This is to intense, I can't watch >_
Have any of you played GoW2, R2, or LBP? No.
These games could really be bad.
Now, it's certainly HIGHLY doubtful that they are bad games, but it's not like it isn't possible.
For instance, GoW2 could be released with massive bugs and glitches or frame rate issues to the point that you can hardly play it, or, in LBP, it may take 15-20 hours to make a decent level and the controls could be terrible to the point that you can't even enjoy the level once you've created it.
There are a number of possible problems with these games that could warrant a low score.
I'm thinking they just aren't living up to the hype, which is almost bound to happen considering everything. I doubt it's sheer fanboyism.
It'd be fair enough for the people to give it such a low score AFTER these games had been released, But they haven't. which means none have them have even played these games yet and are giving it a low score for no other reason then the fact that it is on a rival console.
Actual "professional" reviewers have had/could have had access to these games to play them. I thought only major sources(like gaming magazines and official sites) counted for Metacritic Scores.
If I'm wrong about the inclusion/exclusion of user reviews, then I apologize for the ignorant statement before.
For example, LBP got a professional score of 95/100, But based on votes from thousands of users, it got a 'userbase' score of about 6.5/10
LBP is not a bad game, we know that from the 95/10 average as well as the praise we people gave it from the beta. Resistance 2 isn't bad either, since I'm playing the absolutely amazing beta, adding to the fact it's not out yet. And Gears 2...come on, one, it's not out yet, and two, there's no way it could be bad.
And the first one has nothing to do with reviews of the sequel, Before you comeback with that.
"NUH UHH"
"YUH HAAHH"
"NUH UHHH!!!"
"YUH!! HAAAAAAH!!"
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.