Call of Duty Black Ops Voted ‘Best Game Ending’ Of All Time
19 hours 17 mins ago
Jack Thompson continues his anti-game crusade (and in particular, anti-Take-Two and Strauss Zelnick crusade) by writing a kooky letter invoking the name of God for Take-Two's stock woes.
When hes not leading a shareholder revolt, Jack Thompson is apparently a spokesman for God. In a letter to Take Twos CEO Strauss Zelnick, the former attorney said that Take-Twos recent stock tumble is an act of God.
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Jan 7, 2009
Most recently commented on by on Jan 7, 2009







Comments
Actually, I take that back. Reading the article, he compares himself to Jesus Christ himself. May God damn this wicked vermin.
Of course this just thrown out statements from me, so don't come trashing my post Christians.
Tempting in a way haha, but hey, I'm not the flaming type unless it's truly deserved. But hey, it's your thoughts and whose to stop you from speaking your mind any more than me speaking mine?
Well, what's God doing? Man that could be a LONG thing to explain. Not listing things God is doing, but the whole issue about "seems like He's not doing anything" that not just you tend to think, but many MANY people (myself included in times past and even sometimes today).
"dude, games dont corrupt anyone. ppl who commit crimes and murders already had that in their hearts and they were going to do that even if they never played the games at all. but good game. now go back to playing your Hannah Montana games. kthxby."
Unless you hear from God Himself saying it's His hands doing this, then you claiming it is Him . . . gets you in some hot water my friend.
Everyone watch out because I won't be surprised if Jack doesn't suddenly end up going downhill even faster than we could imagine now.
Therefore, I don't buy your crap Jack Thompson.
Someone sniper the silly sausage.
I didnt say that religions were for fools and crazies. That, would be shallow and naive. Probably bad wording on my behalf, but I wouldnt be so stupid to insult religion and religious beliefs on a message board. Cheers.
But seriously, the whole OMG, GOD HATES TAKE2 is taking things on a wild ride.
So out of all the messed up sh!t in the world, GOD takes his time to stop take two's Stock to save humanity from video games.........no don't worry bout the pedophiles, terrorists, rapists, killers, Uwe Bolle movies, Suicidal people (usually after watching said Uwe Bolle movie), world hunger, global warming, tragedies and other stuff, no,
God has to stop and take care of take2 first huh??
Seriously =/
- Susan B. Anthony
It always is when a freakshow like him is involved.
Do you know what "cult" means or do you simply attribute the word to it in attempts to demean it because your opinion is that you don't like religion? And I don't mean dictionary.com's definition either. I mean the definition that is real and shows the difference between cult and a simple religion (aka belief system . . . such as atheism)?
Your Dictionary.com:
Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary:
This is one of the definitions of the word "cult", you may not like it, and I don't know what other definition you THINK it has...but it's official that organized religion IS a cult.
Oh, and HisServant, don't refer to Atheism as a religion. Please. I understand you being offended by Seeker's comment and explaining your objections, I really do, I was a Christian for a year myself, but religion is something that involes believing in some sort of sentient being/idea/force of nature. Atheism is not that.
Though, Tiger, it's not so much that I was offended by Seeker's comment. Simply by the audacity and ferociousness that some seem to attack religion simply because of their oppinions of it. I don't go attacking and belittling atheists/atheism and agnostics/agnosticism around here on gg or neoseeker, do I? I'm all for discussion of it (so long as it's actual discussing and not attack/flame/arguing), I just get irritated with blatant things like the above. As for my comment about Atheism = religion, honestly without getting technical religion is a belief system (doesn't even need a deity really), and Atheism is indeed a belief. It goes with how I say everyone has faith in things, even if it's something as small as having faith that the chair you are going to sit in, will hold you up even though you've never tested it out before.
Secondly:
Seriously??? You mean to tell me one religion makes more sense than the other?
I would argue saying "I don't think there is one" as opposed to KNOWING there is one does not require any kind of faith.
I'd love to argue back and forth about this but it'd be better either in PM or Intellectual Exchanges, mates.
PS:
Lol, you're digging yourself a deep hole here.
You, however, are on some crazy crusade to just be an anti-religious jerk for reasons that are either very silly or just plain malicious. Either way though, it's wholly unnecessary, since the only thing you stand to gain is looking like an offensive little no-man. So I ask again, was there any point?
Does that honestly sound any less ridiculous?
The thing is you KNOW exactly what I was getting at when I said cult. What you said originally was just the malicious comment of an obnoxious little boy, it had nothing to do with you trying to correct the technicalities of my statement and you know it, we all know it. You were just thinking you were funny while taking the piss out of religion in general so unless you want to keep lying about it I ask again, what was the point?
And Raziel, you raise a fair point. And yes, I do think both ideas are as ridiculous as each other. But that wasn't my point. My point was the creator of scientology admitted that he made it all up for the sake of proving a point. The creator of the cult himself said it was utter lies, proving it to be complete balls. Other religions, however, haven't had things to disprove them on that level, hence why Scientology is so ridiculous even when compared to Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism etc.
Secondly, notice how I said my statement. Was it MY fault that you misused the word? Absolutely not, THEN I gave out numerous (and FACTUAL) definitions...for some reason people STILL took offense.
THEN YOU decided that pointing out a "stupid" religion would help establish your point, which I decided to counter-argue that instead. Now unless you have proof otherwise I'd suggest you stop pointing fingers and resume your life.
Haha, apparently you just agreed with his (and my) original point as well, when you conveniently decided to change the point.
Religion and Does God Exist 47
And there's a difference between my opinion on a religion's views and factual evidence for it's existance. My opinion is that no religion is correct and that many of their ideals are silly, yes. But that's irrelevant. However, the FACTUAL evidence that scientology is bollocks is what I was pointing out, not their ideas but the fact that the creator of it admitted it was bullshit, the factual evidence that it's just lies. Ideals and evidence are completely different hence there being no change in my point or view, you're just percieving what I say wrong or twisting it for the sake of your little arguments. Either way this is obviously leading nowhere so say whatever the hell you want, I'm sure everyone's stopped caring by now.
You're definitely on a roll there, and I thought I was the dick? HisServant77 can put up more of a civilized argument than you.
Ok, go convince them how their religion is a sham and spit on their beliefs for all I care, you'll be doing no better than what I (apparently) am doing now.
I think above all else, it just comes down to the person themselves. Truth is not relative to the winner of a debate. And you cannot force someone to think or believe one thing (then again, if you do, in the realm of faith, belief, and religion, it is no longer sincere and therefore void and fake). The points can go on and on, but really it's not doing anything for either person, because both are wanting to stand their ground no matter what. Right? Just like if I were to ask you (either one), what would it take for me to prove to you that God exists? Then your answer would probably be along the lines of "You can't." or "Show me God" or something along the lines of things I really can't do for you. So if nothing I can personally do or say will change your mind . . . there's really no reason to continue. Right?
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.