Jack Thompson continues his anti-game crusade (and in particular, anti-Take-Two and Strauss Zelnick crusade) by writing a kooky letter invoking the name of God for Take-Two's stock woes.

When he’s not leading a shareholder revolt, Jack Thompson is apparently a spokesman for God. In a letter to Take Two’s CEO Strauss Zelnick, the former attorney said that Take-Two’s recent stock tumble is an act of God.
| More
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Jan 7, 2009
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 1
    Red 9 Dec 29, 08
    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand there goes his sanity!
    • 3
      Tiger of Wu Dec 30, 08
      You say that as if he hasn't lost it already.
      • 1
        Capn Droid Dec 30, 08
        You say that as if he ever had any.
        • 0
          Tiger of Wu Dec 30, 08
          Well, to be fair, he must have had some when he was like... 1 years old... maybe. Even Satan was an angel once. I mean, I'm sure there was once a time when his face didn't look like a piece of raw steak too.
        • 0
          Capn Droid Dec 30, 08
          Hmmm... I do see your point. Plus, wasn't there a Tim Buckley comic that explained why he's insane over video games, anyways?
        • 0
          Tiger of Wu Dec 30, 08
          I don't know. I assume it's because he was once a concerned person who took the misinformation of the media claiming games as poison a little too far and has since turned his false accusations into an unholy obsession because it's beyond his mental capabilities to just hold up his hands and say 'fair enough, I was wrong' so he instead holds onto this notion that games are evil and he no longer has anything else of worth, his fear of being shamed in public (because in his mind being wrong is something to be ashamed of, as opposed to a simple act of being human) driving his life to the point where he turns to the deluded freak-show we know and hate today. That's just my theory though.
    • 0
      Gutter_Tech Dec 30, 08
      what is it with the idiots in this country? they run out of arguments and logical things to say so they start ranting about god. first george bush, now jack thompson......
  • 2
    Slumpy monkey Dec 30, 08
    This guy is a *bleep*ing nut case.
    • 0
      Final Blade Dec 30, 08
      It's been well established since his first gamegrep article with Dr. Phil around April 2007.
      • 0
        Capn Droid Jan 3, 09
        Jack Thompson and Dr. Phil? Hell yeah, that sounds like a good time.
  • 0
    xxxRockerxxx Dec 30, 08
    Well, I was knew him to grasp at straws when he's making his point, but WTF!?
  • 3
    AznLiquid Dec 30, 08
    Jack Thompson's disbarment was an act of God.
  • 0
    SUPREM_KITE Dec 30, 08
    Seriously Jack you lost just give up. You already were banned from your job and from what I have read your political career was filled with corruption and middle school name calling. Grow up already. The only people that games actually affect are those who had some kind of mental stability issue in the first case. Also Jack don't blame take two for selling games to minors the only people they sell games to are multi-billion dollar people who own stores like gamestop, it is the people like those who sell video games to minors. In fact they don't even do that anymore I get ID'ed all the time to buy games to make sure Im old enough.
  • 0
    Capn Droid Dec 30, 08
    Here I was, thinking Wacko Jacko's disbarment would mean the end of his comedy routines. Ahhh, I guess not.

    Actually, I take that back. Reading the article, he compares himself to Jesus Christ himself. May God damn this wicked vermin.
  • 1
    The Omega Dec 30, 08
    If God truly existed, Jack Thompson would have been smitten by now. This fool's opinion doesn't matter. He's like a fallen star who's trying to keep himself in the limelight, except no one has ever liked him.
    • 0
      Capn Droid Dec 30, 08
      How can the two terms for smitten mean totally different things? ;-;
      • 0
        The Omega Dec 30, 08
        I know, it's kind of confusing. I should have used smote instead Smote just didn't sound good with the rest of the sentence.
        • 0
          Capn Droid Dec 30, 08
          Why can't the English language allow smited, ffs. ;4;
    • 0
      HisServant77 Dec 30, 08
      Well that's faulty logic there my friend. With that thinking, a LOT of people wouldn't exist today. A lot of evil wouldn't exist. But. . . nope there's this pesky thing called free will that allows people to behave unseemly and think their own thoughts. There are consequences of course, but not all are immediately seen happening. Some . . . well, we will indeed see them.
  • 1
    ShadowJ Dec 30, 08
    Yes Jack because when God isn't busy doing whatever he does and answering the 50 billion prayers he gets every night, he really is causing nasty, evil and corrupt companies out of business by forcing their stock to tumble...while innocent people are murdered and killed each day....hmmmm just slap "Insane" on his forehead and chuck him in a padded cell for the rest of his pathetic and worthless life
    • 1
      Tiger of Wu Dec 30, 08
      Or better yet just slap him over the head really hard with a really heavy blunt instrument. It'll either knock some sense into him or kill him. Either way, it'll be doing everyone a favor.
    • 0
      Final Blade Dec 30, 08
      God being busy? Surely that can't be. I mean we're still trying to solve World Hunger and the charities called Toys for tots. I mean you'd think miracles would have happened by now. I'm curious what exactly he is doing. It seems like he's not doing anything at all.

      Of course this just thrown out statements from me, so don't come trashing my post Christians.
      • 0
        HisServant77 Dec 30, 08
        Eh . . . Nah I wouldn't trash your post or flame you FB.

        Tempting in a way haha, but hey, I'm not the flaming type unless it's truly deserved. But hey, it's your thoughts and whose to stop you from speaking your mind any more than me speaking mine?
        • 0
          Final Blade Dec 30, 08
          I was raised as a Christian, it's just the last 6 years I've developed my own beliefs. Many which come from other religions like Karma and Reincarnation and other stuff. I just no longer call my self a fully straight Christian. Don't need someone to tell me what to believe in. No offense to the churches though. Besides that, I still believe in God. I'm just curious what he's actually doing.
      • 0
        HisServant77 Dec 30, 08
        Yeah I think I remember you saying before how you were raised Christian but now take different beliefs from other places and all that.

        Well, what's God doing? Man that could be a LONG thing to explain. Not listing things God is doing, but the whole issue about "seems like He's not doing anything" that not just you tend to think, but many MANY people (myself included in times past and even sometimes today).
        • 0
          ShadowJ Dec 30, 08
          Aye that's why I put it as "being busy" as I didn't know any other way of putting it without going into a massive essay about it. I, myself am Agnostic but I went to a christian school
  • 0
    Shinobi_razor Dec 30, 08
    Jesus says:

    "dude, games dont corrupt anyone. ppl who commit crimes and murders already had that in their hearts and they were going to do that even if they never played the games at all. but good game. now go back to playing your Hannah Montana games. kthxby."
    • 0
      HisServant77 Dec 30, 08
      I . . . I don't think I remember this quote, Shin.
  • 1
    HisServant77 Dec 30, 08
    Jack, Jack, Jack. Now what are you going to do if the stocks suddenly go the exact opposite and skyrocket?

    Unless you hear from God Himself saying it's His hands doing this, then you claiming it is Him . . . gets you in some hot water my friend.

    Everyone watch out because I won't be surprised if Jack doesn't suddenly end up going downhill even faster than we could imagine now.
  • 1
    Killosity Dec 30, 08
    Thanks heavens im not religious.

    Therefore, I don't buy your crap Jack Thompson.
    Someone sniper the silly sausage.
    • 0
      Shinobi_razor Dec 31, 08
      OMG dont be so shallow as to think all religious ppl are as ridiculous as Jack. thats incredibly naive. im religious and i dont like Jack at all. no where does the Bible ever say you cant play Mature games or any kind of crap he's making up.
      • 0
        Killosity Dec 31, 08
        I was merely saying that because im not religious, anything said in relation to to God from Jack doesnt work for me. Hes a washed up old fool.

        I didnt say that religions were for fools and crazies. That, would be shallow and naive. Probably bad wording on my behalf, but I wouldnt be so stupid to insult religion and religious beliefs on a message board. Cheers.
  • 0
    Miss Razz Dec 30, 08
    For some reason I don't think God gives two shits about the stockmarket.
  • 0
    StarJet Dec 30, 08
    Who cares about Jack Thompson? He's just sour because he didn't get to play games when he was a teenager.
    But seriously, the whole OMG, GOD HATES TAKE2 is taking things on a wild ride.
  • 1
    dwg14390 Dec 30, 08
    Take2 stock failure was an act of GOD??

    So out of all the messed up sh!t in the world, GOD takes his time to stop take two's Stock to save humanity from video games.........no don't worry bout the pedophiles, terrorists, rapists, killers, Uwe Bolle movies, Suicidal people (usually after watching said Uwe Bolle movie), world hunger, global warming, tragedies and other stuff, no,

    God has to stop and take care of take2 first huh??

    Seriously =/
  • 7
    Seeker X Dec 30, 08
    I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires.

    - Susan B. Anthony
    • 0
      HisServant77 Jan 3, 09
      ha, Sorry Susan B. Anthony, your a good person but you've been hanging around the wrong people if that's true. People such as our fellow Jack who simply says "God says. . ." without it being true . . . those who may go to church but are only Christians in church --- in other words, hypocrites.
  • 2
    Dine_Agoti Dec 30, 08
    We really need to just ignore this attention-seeker from now on. He's pretty much devolved into nothing more than an IRL troll.
  • 0
    kspiess Dec 30, 08
    Want some nuts for your bar Jack?
  • 0
    pooOBKp Dec 31, 08
    Jack, I love you, let me join your crusades please. You speak the truth in every way possible.
  • 1
    Bale Fire Jan 3, 09
    Wow, who bets he starts a religion next?
    • 2
      Tiger of Wu Jan 3, 09
      I think the word you're looking for is cult

      It always is when a freakshow like him is involved.
      • 1
        Seeker X Jan 3, 09
        Organized religion IS a cult.
        • 0
          HisServant77 Jan 4, 09
          So . . . unorganized religion is better? Hm . . .

          Do you know what "cult" means or do you simply attribute the word to it in attempts to demean it because your opinion is that you don't like religion? And I don't mean dictionary.com's definition either. I mean the definition that is real and shows the difference between cult and a simple religion (aka belief system . . . such as atheism)?
        • 2
          Seeker X Jan 4, 09
          Dictionary.com:

          quote
          a particular system of religious worship, esp. with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
          Your Dictionary.com:

          quote
          a system of religious worship or ritual
          Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary:

          quote
          formal religious veneration
          This is one of the definitions of the word "cult", you may not like it, and I don't know what other definition you THINK it has...but it's official that organized religion IS a cult.
        • 1
          Tiger of Wu Jan 4, 09
          Well, I was going by the widely regarded definition, as in a religion that's blatantly stupid and hasn't even a full 1% chance of being correct and is believed by few, an obvious example being Scientology. Whether that's actual definition or not is irrelevant, in the same way many people take render to graphically mean a cut-out when in fact the actual definition of render is create. graphically or not. It's just easier then being a little smart-arse and going by actual, technical definition all the time and having someone show up and go on about what they think it means. Evidentally that ploy has backfired.

          Oh, and HisServant, don't refer to Atheism as a religion. Please. I understand you being offended by Seeker's comment and explaining your objections, I really do, I was a Christian for a year myself, but religion is something that involes believing in some sort of sentient being/idea/force of nature. Atheism is not that.
        • 0
          HisServant77 Jan 4, 09
          Right, Tiger, I was considering the connotation of the word Cult as opposed to the dictation. However, there is still another definition of the word Cult that is used more widely instead of technicality, that separates Cult from simple Religion.

          Though, Tiger, it's not so much that I was offended by Seeker's comment. Simply by the audacity and ferociousness that some seem to attack religion simply because of their oppinions of it. I don't go attacking and belittling atheists/atheism and agnostics/agnosticism around here on gg or neoseeker, do I? I'm all for discussion of it (so long as it's actual discussing and not attack/flame/arguing), I just get irritated with blatant things like the above. As for my comment about Atheism = religion, honestly without getting technical religion is a belief system (doesn't even need a deity really), and Atheism is indeed a belief. It goes with how I say everyone has faith in things, even if it's something as small as having faith that the chair you are going to sit in, will hold you up even though you've never tested it out before.
        • 2
          Tiger of Wu Jan 5, 09
          Faith and religion are COMPLETELY different things though. You can't have religion without faith, true, but you can have faith without religion. Religion isn't just a belief system otherwise the word would be null and void.
  • 0
    Shinobi_razor Jan 4, 09
    that makes atheism a cult as well. its a belief that ppl hold to without any physical proof, which makes it a religion, which makes it a cult.
    • 2
      Seeker X Jan 4, 09
      You mean LACK of belief. And secondly, it has no rituals.
      • 0
        Shinobi_razor Jan 4, 09
        i would argue that a lack of belief is in fact a belief in and of itself. essentially you are choosing to believe that there is no higher power to believe in, see?
        • 0
          HisServant77 Jan 4, 09
          Exactly Shin. The belief that there is no God, is indeed a belief system in itself. It's rituals? Well apparently many adhere to the unspoken/unwritten ritual of putting down religion.
  • 1
    Seeker X Jan 4, 09
    Lol! I never even insulted religion at all, look at the definitions...is there ANYTHING demeaning in there? I didn't think so. So let's not get ourselves worked up here.

    Secondly:

    quote
    Well, I was going by the widely regarded definition, as in a religion that's blatantly stupid and hasn't even a full 1% chance of being correct and is believed by few, an obvious example being Scientology.
    Seriously??? You mean to tell me one religion makes more sense than the other?

    quote
    i would argue that a lack of belief is in fact a belief in and of itself. essentially you are choosing to believe that there is no higher power to believe in, see?
    I would argue saying "I don't think there is one" as opposed to KNOWING there is one does not require any kind of faith.

    I'd love to argue back and forth about this but it'd be better either in PM or Intellectual Exchanges, mates.

    PS:

    quote
    It's rituals? Well apparently many adhere to the unspoken/unwritten ritual of putting down religion.
    Lol, you're digging yourself a deep hole here.
    • 0
      HisServant77 Jan 4, 09
      I'm not for arguing back and forth about it. Discussing it, sure. But as for me digging a deep hole . . . why is that? The comment was slightly lighthearted while remaining fairly true.
      • 1
        Seeker X Jan 4, 09
        Obviously you were joking about the whole ritual thing but what you're arguing goes both ways here. For every aggressive atheist there's an aggressive religious person...whatever point was there is moot.
        • 0
          HisServant77 Jan 4, 09
          I agree, there are indeed some religious people who are the same with atheism/agnosticism, or even anything against their own beliefs.
        • 0
          Tiger of Wu Jan 5, 09
          So you say you weren't insulting religion only to actually do so mere moments later? Is there any point?
        • 1
          Seeker X Jan 6, 09
          You were the one that insulted Scientology since apparently it's "blatantly stupid". You opened the door to "reason" and "logic".
        • 1
          Tiger of Wu Jan 6, 09
          Scientologists believe that aliens dropped our souls into volcanoes because a man wrote it in a book not too long ago, even after he admitted it was all bullshit and he wrote it to prove how stupid people are. So yes, Scientology is blatantly stupid. Anyone who says otherwise is stupid or very misinformed.

          You, however, are on some crazy crusade to just be an anti-religious jerk for reasons that are either very silly or just plain malicious. Either way though, it's wholly unnecessary, since the only thing you stand to gain is looking like an offensive little no-man. So I ask again, was there any point?
        • 0
          Seeker X Jan 6, 09
          It hardly matters because you still attacked people's beliefs. Which seems a little hypocritical on your side. My point? Just a couple of corrections, till people wanted to take it a little farther. Now you make it sound like I am flipping the finger at churches, at the very least I'm not going like "*bleep* RELIGION" or some anarchistic shit like that, so get off your high horse, you look a little too smug up there.
        • 1
          Raziel_326 Jan 6, 09
          quote
          Scientologists believe that aliens dropped our souls into volcanoes because a man wrote it in a book not too long ago
          And christians believe that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can save your soul and make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master and savor, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a woman made from the rib of a man was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical fruit tree only because it was written in some 2000 year old book.

          Does that honestly sound any less ridiculous?
        • 0
          Tiger of Wu Jan 7, 09
          Smug? What, so I'm the kettle and you're the pot then?

          The thing is you KNOW exactly what I was getting at when I said cult. What you said originally was just the malicious comment of an obnoxious little boy, it had nothing to do with you trying to correct the technicalities of my statement and you know it, we all know it. You were just thinking you were funny while taking the piss out of religion in general so unless you want to keep lying about it I ask again, what was the point?

          And Raziel, you raise a fair point. And yes, I do think both ideas are as ridiculous as each other. But that wasn't my point. My point was the creator of scientology admitted that he made it all up for the sake of proving a point. The creator of the cult himself said it was utter lies, proving it to be complete balls. Other religions, however, haven't had things to disprove them on that level, hence why Scientology is so ridiculous even when compared to Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism etc.
        • 0
          Seeker X Jan 7, 09
          quote
          Smug? What, so I'm the kettle and you're the pot then?
          Ironically I'm not the one degrading, NOR am I talking down to anyone else in here (until you decided to be a dick, but that's something else).

          Secondly, notice how I said my statement. Was it MY fault that you misused the word? Absolutely not, THEN I gave out numerous (and FACTUAL) definitions...for some reason people STILL took offense.

          THEN YOU decided that pointing out a "stupid" religion would help establish your point, which I decided to counter-argue that instead. Now unless you have proof otherwise I'd suggest you stop pointing fingers and resume your life.

          quote
          And yes, I do think both ideas are as ridiculous as each other
          Haha, apparently you just agreed with his (and my) original point as well, when you conveniently decided to change the point.
        • 0
          Capn Droid Jan 7, 09
          And to think I flame. At least I look for links and facts. ._.

        • 0
          Tiger of Wu Jan 7, 09
          You called all religions cults. If you don't consider that degrading then there's no point even talking to you, because we both know you weren't trying to correct the usage of the word and to say so is utter bull. And yes I'm talking down to you because you either are stupid or are just plain trying to piss people off. And me a dick? Again, kettle/pot.

          And there's a difference between my opinion on a religion's views and factual evidence for it's existance. My opinion is that no religion is correct and that many of their ideals are silly, yes. But that's irrelevant. However, the FACTUAL evidence that scientology is bollocks is what I was pointing out, not their ideas but the fact that the creator of it admitted it was bullshit, the factual evidence that it's just lies. Ideals and evidence are completely different hence there being no change in my point or view, you're just percieving what I say wrong or twisting it for the sake of your little arguments. Either way this is obviously leading nowhere so say whatever the hell you want, I'm sure everyone's stopped caring by now.
        • 0
          Seeker X Jan 7, 09
          quote
          You called all religions cults. If you don't consider that degrading then there's no point even talking to you, because we both know you weren't trying to correct the usage of the word and to say so is utter bull.
          I called organized religion a cult...dunno why you still find it offensive since the definitions are up there, and I do believe that's what organized religion is all about (not a single insult up there). Now if you mean Evil Cults and whatnot, well I guess that's another story, but you didn't say that. Oh I get it! I'm not allowed to correct someone!

          quote
          I'm talking down to you because you either are stupid
          quote
          are on some crazy crusade to just be an anti-religious jerk
          quote
          What you said originally was just the malicious comment of an obnoxious little boy
          You're definitely on a roll there, and I thought I was the dick? HisServant77 can put up more of a civilized argument than you.

          quote
          But that's irrelevant. However, the FACTUAL evidence that scientology is bollocks is what I was pointing out, not their ideas but the fact that the creator of it admitted it was bullshit, the factual evidence that it's just lies.
          Ok, go convince them how their religion is a sham and spit on their beliefs for all I care, you'll be doing no better than what I (apparently) am doing now.
        • 0
          HisServant77 Jan 7, 09
          Well I would hope I can be civilized That's what I prefer, civilized discussion instead of flamatory arguing.

          I think above all else, it just comes down to the person themselves. Truth is not relative to the winner of a debate. And you cannot force someone to think or believe one thing (then again, if you do, in the realm of faith, belief, and religion, it is no longer sincere and therefore void and fake). The points can go on and on, but really it's not doing anything for either person, because both are wanting to stand their ground no matter what. Right? Just like if I were to ask you (either one), what would it take for me to prove to you that God exists? Then your answer would probably be along the lines of "You can't." or "Show me God" or something along the lines of things I really can't do for you. So if nothing I can personally do or say will change your mind . . . there's really no reason to continue. Right?
  • 0
    stabbedbyahippie Jan 7, 09
    Does anyone take this guy seriously?

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.