Last week, female Xbox Live user Teresa was banned from using Xbox Live for stating in her profile that she was a lesbian.

Teresa claimed that every time she went online she was harassed by gamers and disgusted parents, and after having numerous complaints put against her, Microsoft eventually banned her from the service.

This isn't the first time Microsoft has angered the gay community, of course. Last year, Xbox Live user theGAYERgamer was also suspended for having an "offensive" gamertag.

Mod edit: Xbox LIVE's Terms of Use currently prohibits expression of sexual orientation of any kind.

The gay gaming community is in uproar this morning after word broke that an Xbox Live user was banned for identifying herself as a lesbian.

Ex-Xbox Live member, Teresa (that's EX member - hold onto your friend requests) says she was harassed by other players and later suspended from the service for noting her sexual preference in her Xbox Live profile.

Apparently, when Teresa appealed to Microsoft, the company told her that other gamers found her sexual orientation "offensive."

"I was harassed by several players, 'chased' to different maps/games to get away from their harassment. They followed me into the games and told all the other players to turn me in because they didn't want to see that crap or their kids to see that crap.
| More
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Mar 2, 2009
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 4
    Dark Arcanine Feb 27, 09
    That's ridiculous. I have many lesbian friends which makes it more annoying to me on a personal level. Hope she sues their discriminative arses for a lot of money.
    • 4
      RKRigney Feb 28, 09
      The terms of service say not to include anything sexually related in your bio.

      She included something sexually related in her bio.

      She deserved it. Any questions?
      • 0
        Capn Droid Mar 1, 09
        Agreed. It's ridiculous that it's even in the rules in the first place; it's just how people are. But it's in the Terms of Use contract that the player has agreed with since the beginning, so Microsoft really is in the right here.
        • 2
          Dark Arcanine Mar 1, 09
          Perhaps, but it is discrimination none the less. Not allowing someone to say who they are isn't right.
        • 3
          Shuyu Mar 1, 09
          Dark Arcanine, for it to be discrimination, they would have to allow priveleges to one party and not another. Since no one - gay, straight, bi, whatever - can say anything, everyone is being treated fairly. There is no discrimination.
        • 0
          Dark Arcanine Mar 2, 09
          That's rubbish, Freedom of Speech is a damn right.
        • 0
          Shuyu Mar 2, 09
          The American consitution describes the First Amendment as being that no federal entity can block a citizen from expressing their opinions. The keywords are "federal entity". Microsoft is not a federal entity, they can do whatever they damn well please, within reason.

          (And as an Australian, you should be interested to know that nowhere in the Australian consitution is it explicity stated that we have a right to free speech.)

        • 3
          RabidChinaGirl Mar 2, 09
          I think it may be best to say that neither Teresa nor Microsoft were wrong, but both could have handled the situation differently. The real problem is that bigots exist.
  • 1
    Play ISDF Feb 27, 09
    That's just messed up. Intolerance in people just doesn't seem to stop reaching new levels these days.
  • 2
    Gamesta100 Feb 27, 09
    They don't want their kids to see that crap, I hope they don't let their kids play games online then.
  • 4
    RabidChinaGirl Feb 27, 09
    I read about this last week from a few sources. There's just too many things wrong with it that I don't even know where to start. Sadly enough, I can't even react with anger anymore... mostly just disappointment. Aside from all the LIVE cases, there's the fact that such terms are censored on PlayStation Home.

    Gotta love this global society.
    • 1
      kik36 Feb 28, 09
      Home definitely has some extremely strict word filters. You can't even say "Hello", it shows up as "****o". Took me a little while to figure that one out LMAO What is disturbing though is that people would be speaking on their mics and saying the filthiest shit. I was appalled. Not sure if they changed it though. I know they disabled voice chat for a short while there.

      I'm not easily offended either......I cuss like a sailor at times, but there are some real creepy bastards out there roaming HOME LOL
      • 0
        RabidChinaGirl Feb 28, 09
        I've heard pretty crazy stories from Home that make me think twice about whether it's a good idea. I wanted to see for myself, but all the people I know with PS3s don't even know what Home is! Non-gamers.
  • 1
    Aussie Legend Feb 27, 09
    That is just complete stupidity. I thought we had moved past the Middle Ages -_-

    Hope she gets reinstated, with some money from a lawsuit to boot
  • 1
    Anubis Feb 27, 09
    Now come on Microsoft, that's just ridiculous.

    And yeah, She should really sue them for being so stupid.
  • 5
    Miss Razz Feb 27, 09
    I dunno what's sadder ... the fact that Microsoft banned her no questions asked (why not just tell her to remove it from her profile?), or the fact that there were parents who attacked her and treated her like garbage because "they didn't want their kids to see that crap". I'm leaning towards the latter.

    If I was a parent, I'd be more worried about the assholes who threaten and harass other members who are just trying to play a game and have some fun.
    • 2
      Big A2* Feb 27, 09
      Me too. People like that make me sick.

      I think it's all the religious extremists or something. They need to stop having kids.
      • 1
        Euphoric Feb 27, 09
        We need to bring back a spartan style childhood. Only include mentality tests more so than disability.
        • 4
          Big A2* Feb 28, 09
        • 0
          Euphoric Feb 28, 09
          I love it! That would definitely be my model for the education system if I ever got to make those decisions. Bottomless pit included.
  • 1
    Zeon I Feb 27, 09
    I don't have any problems playing with a Lesbian gamer, I bet she's cooler to talk to than half of the douchebags trolling Live.

    I bet all the parent's kids were playing Rated M Games. I hope the douchebags I talked about trolled all of their kids, too.
  • 10
    Bale Fire* Feb 28, 09
    This isn't discrimination, talking of your sexual orientation on Xbox Live is banned full stop. It's to stop all the discrimination and verbal abuse which inevitably will follow.

    So I have no problem with it.
  • 13
    Shuyu Feb 28, 09
    What Silver Mirror said is true, Microsoft has it stated that no player is to mention their sexual orientation at all - they have also banned users for announcing that they are straight.

    They didn't ban her because she's a lesbian, they banned her for being a righteous idiot who thought people really had to or wanted to know.

    As a lesbian myself, I'm not even fazed by this - and I think anyone who finds it offensive is an idiot. She made the choice so now she has to suffer the consequences of that choice, whether she likes it or not.
    • 2
      Gamesta100 Feb 28, 09
      You should watch a vid by Blunty3000 that addresses this and says what you said but in more detail.
    • 3
      RabidChinaGirl Feb 28, 09
      Hm, that's a pretty good point. You hear a lot about these bans on LIVE related to homosexuality, but nobody who reports 'em even bother mentioning the fact that MS does the same for any sexual orientation. Mmm... biased news reporting. Delicious.

      In which case, the GG headline should be, "Xbox LIVE bans girl for posting about her sexuality."

      My disappointment/annoyance isn't so much with Microsoft, to be perfectly honest. They're in a hard position because cases like these get reported, and people will point fingers at MS for discrimination. At the same time, there's a lot of LIVE users who have a problem with homosexuality, and it becomes a question of who MS wants to risk displeasing more. More to the point, I'm frustrated by the way she was treated by other users because of it... though I am not at all surprised.

      When I first heard this story a few days ago, my first reaction is, "Why would she post her sexuality on LIVE?" And I wondered if this girl had any idea she was painting a bullseye on herself by mentioning it. Sad fact of life: Women need to watch their backs, not leave themselves open like that. Even online. Maybe she was naive, maybe she was looking for trouble. It's a shitty situation overall.
      • 0
        vortis Feb 28, 09
        It's amazng how far an act for attention will work as a plea for peace in the end.
  • 0
    Blaze Feb 28, 09
    Gamesta: Link please.

    So it's not just people on XBL who are assholes, it's the managers too. >_>
  • 1
    Gamesta100 Feb 28, 09
    • 0
      Blaze Feb 28, 09
      Makes sense, thanks for showing me.
  • 1
    Onvacation Feb 28, 09
    There was no need to even address her sexuality on Xbox live anyway, She got what she deserves which was trying to provoke a response from people. I might put 'I like Girls' in my motto and let everyone know mine too!!
  • 0
    Tiger of Wu Feb 28, 09
    I was in outrage when I read this article. I thought there was some profile page thing and it included adding this kind of stuff, and that Microsoft banned her because people didn't like her being a lesbian.

    Then I did some research (which I found out could have been avoided if I had read the comments on the article before looking further into it XD) and realised it's her own fault and that the media are again looking for attention with attempts at controversy (CVG using the gay welsh guy from Little Britain as the image was REALLY *bleep*ing ironic, btw.) by being bias morons.

    I don't know how big of a deal they make about not stating sexuality, so perhaps letting her back on with a different account under strict observation (on probation if you will) will be in order, but if they make it blatant and say DON'T DO IT in big letters then let her suffer. If you're going to stick your head in the oven, you're not going to be allowed back in the kitchen
  • 1
    reaver11 Feb 28, 09
    Does Microsoft have something against homosexuality? I mean, I wouldn't think she described her sexual encounters in her profile so its not like she was exceedingly open about it, but she's obviously not ashamed to admit it. So what was the big deal? I for one wouldn't have put that on my profile, but hey, thats me.:rollseyes: So maybe she was asking for it, maybe not, but even so its discimination and Microsoft really ought to change their policies or just ease off. A friendly e-mail from them asking her to revise her profile would have been enough.
    • 0
      Tiger of Wu Feb 28, 09
      It wouldn't have, because people were already hassling her so if she took it off her profile they'd still hassle her because they would still know from when she had it on.
      • 1
        reaver11 Feb 28, 09
        If she were to remove it, it would have made a difference. Once the information is down, then she could probably get the other people suspended for harrassing her. Obviously the other people would still know, but once its down, its down, and she could probably get away with a lawsuit for discrimination/deformation of character if Microsoft were to suspend her following the removal of the "harmful" input.

        I really don't understand what the world has against same-sex couples. Its a way of life, and over-protective parents need to get over that (as well as the herd of immature addolesence's who still think the word "gay" is funny). Microsoft should issue a statement or something because this is the second time something like this has happened. They may raise some eyebrows if they keep doing this w/o explainations.
        • 0
          Tiger of Wu Feb 28, 09
          Business point of view: Suspend one person for breaking the rules or suspend however many were harassing her (around ten I'd guess) for breaking the rules. Even if she took it down people would still know, stupid redneck mothers would still be in outrage and she would still be harassed about it.

          Doing this w/o explanation? They've explained it. People have explained it for them. You're not supposed to state your sexual orientation, PERIOD. And this isn't discrimination against gays by Microsoft; they've done the same to people who've stated they're straight.

          Yes, there's nothing wrong with being gay. If someone is gay, good for them. But at the end of the day when Microsoft say don't talk about your sexuality on XboxLIVE at all and somebody does they can expect to get punished. Yes, people shouldn't be so ignorant and people shouldn't have hassled her, but that's just the way some people are on there. People are told not to state their sexuality because of this reason, it's for their own protection as well, and if they ignore the warning, do it anyway and get harassed because of it, it's their own self-righteous fault. It's a *bleep*ed up system, but you can't expect them to ban every single person who says something offensive otherwise they would be out of business.

          Oh, and the world has nothing against same-sex couples, just a small ignorant part of it does. Stop acting like we're in the dark ages.
  • 0
    Shortman Feb 28, 09
    The most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. This really is not on by Microsoft. Are they going to ban every Gay or Lesbian Live Member?
    • 0
      Onvacation Feb 28, 09
      Yes, if they bring it up for no reason on live. Microsoft has repeatedly stated that no-one NO-ONE will be allowed to mention their Sexuality, be it lesbo, straight, or gay. They don't want lawsuits from parents of children who see it and ask questions about iot. presumably
    • 0
      Shinobi_razor Feb 28, 09
      MS does not ban anyone because of sexual orientation. they cannot do that because its discrimination and 100% illegal. what they banned her for is announcing to everyone that she's gay, not FOR BEING gay. there is what we call "dont ask dont tell". if you feel the need to proclaim your sexual orientation, Xbox Live is NOT the appropriate place to do so, and its outlined carefully in the Terms and Conditions thing when you sign up for Live. save that for My Space or something. the Media is just whining and looking for a scape goat.
  • 2
    Shadow of Death Feb 28, 09
    Meh, while announcing your sexual orientation isn't necessary, I think it is a bit excessive to ban people over it...

    I mean shoot, even if it is in the ToS and technically you're supposed to read it before you accept it, who actually does hmmmm?

    It isn't something you'd think would be a huge problem.

    Possibly, she was just hoping for some attention, and it backfired (she got attention, the wrong sort).
    • 2
      Shinobi_razor Feb 28, 09
      you absolutely are supposed to read the ToS. if you dont and MS calls you out on a violation of something in it, thats YOUR own fault. you have absolutely no ground to stand on if you tried to take MS to court for banning you over an issue that was firmly outlined in the ToS, the judge will laugh you out of the court because its written clearly for you to read. if you failed to read it, its not MS's fault.
      • 2
        Shadow of Death Mar 1, 09
        And where did I say she should sue?

        My first point was that banning was a bit excessive (even if it is against the ToS, it really shouldn't be in the first place IMO).

        And I KNOW you're supposed to read the ToS (everyone knows that, pretty much), my other point was 'who actually reads that stuff?'. They are often dozens upon dozens of paragraphs long. While you're supposed to read them, and it is your own fault if you get punished for going against it, my point/question is really 'how many people actually read their ToS when signing up to stuff?'.

        So I don't see what points you're supposed to be rebutting?

        Regardless, apparently she wasn't banned.
        • 1
          Tiger of Wu Mar 1, 09
          He's saying that it's her fault and was using the legal perspective as an example for why it's her fault, he's not saying you said she should sue or anything.
    • 1
      RabidChinaGirl Feb 28, 09
      She wasn't actually banned. Did some research and modified the GG post to be a little less misleading.
  • 0
    Hunskelper Feb 28, 09
    I read the first few comments, and also the hilariously sensationalised headline, and really could not be arsed to continue reading.

    It's not because she's a lesbian, it's because she mentions her sexuality in her profile. If someone were to mention they were straight in their profile they would be banned too.



    Anyway. I do think banning someone for mentioning their sexual orientation is a bit harsh. They could easily have just asked her to remove it.
  • 0
    Slumpy monkey Feb 28, 09
    She can undo it by just taking it out of her profile.
    She's not banned, she's suspended from the service until she changes it.
    • 0
      Blaze Feb 28, 09
      I'd change it like now lol.
    • 0
      pooOBKp Feb 28, 09
      That sucks that she'd have to pay the $10 or 800 MS points to change it, oh well, her fault anyways.
      • 2
        Onvacation Feb 28, 09
        What? you don't have to pay anything to change your profile.
      • 1
        Hunskelper Feb 28, 09
        You don't have to pay to change your profile.

        If it was her gamertag that was considered offensive MS give the offender a free name change.
        • 0
          pooOBKp Mar 1, 09
          What's the difference between the two? I always just thought a profile and gamertag were the same thing.
        • 0
          Hunskelper Mar 1, 09
          No.

          Your gamertag is your name, like mine xXxsm0kew33d4LYFxXx. Your profile is details like where you're from, what you're interested in etc.
        • 0
          pooOBKp Mar 1, 09
          Oh ok, I just thought that both were hand in hand, my bad though.
  • 0
    AT_AG Feb 28, 09
    after reading the title i have one thing to say. i will never laugh harder than this ever in my life
  • 0
    Armed Rebel Feb 28, 09
    Some staff member needs to change this title, it's entirely false, misleading and worded that way for no other reason than to incite some "OMG MICROSOFT SUX" mini-revolution.
    • 0
      Miss Razz Feb 28, 09
      Honestly... I worded it that way because I couldn't think of a better way to word it. And I didn't expect people to take it so liteally. I've got nothing against MS. But yeah, I've changed it now.
      • 1
        Hunskelper Feb 28, 09
        Seriously? You couldn't think of a better way of wording it than the previous title which was so ridiculously off the mark it was libellous?
  • 2
    ShadowJ Feb 28, 09
    TBH yes the title is misleading, I was ready to write a whole novel on "political correctness gone wrong" but after reading the article it seems all you hear is one side and that's the side of the victim.

    Like many others have said, it's her fault and Microsoft for their own protection and hers, banned her. After all if they acted on her behalf by banning those harrassing her then Microsoft would lose a huge fanbse and a lot of money. By doing it this way, they have lost one and probably a few more that disagree with Microsoft.

    At the end of the day, people go on XBL to game, not to chat people up or find out whether they like men, women or something inbetween. If you want that then go to myspace, facebook or somewhere else other than an online gaming service.

    Although it is shame to read about pathetic parents and gamers that can't let people be what they want to be and are ¬_¬
  • 0
    XboxOmac Feb 28, 09
    And so I thought we had rights.......
    • 1
      Euphoric Feb 28, 09
      You do when it hasn't been made quite clear already in terms and conditions that you aren't supposed to do something. To then go and do it has nothing to do with rights. It's against the rules or the law. You forfeit some rights when you accept companies' Terms and Conditions. End of story. You can't argue that.
    • 1
      Tiger of Wu Feb 28, 09
      You have the right to know what you're talking about. Evidentally you don't like using it.
    • 0
      Slumpy monkey Mar 1, 09
      You have no rights with MS. Your rights are what any government institution has to abide by. MS is a private company.
  • 0
    Lord_80 Mar 1, 09
    Yep as so many people have said this girl had it coming. It isn't that Microsoft is discriminating against gays its just that they are securing themselves so certain things just can't be said. So really I have no sympathy for this girl. By all menas she can be a lesbian. She just shouldn't share some personal information. Case closed.
  • 1
    Burkedawg Mar 1, 09
    Live is full of homophobic rednecks anyway.
  • 0
    Daydreaming Mar 1, 09
    She could've just said she was male.
    • 2
      Bale Fire* Mar 1, 09
      A male lesbian?
      • 2
        Onvacation Mar 2, 09
        No, Because males like girls. So it has the same effect. Use your head.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.