Two Classic Characters Return For Resident Evil 5's Mercenaries Reunion
10 hours 42 mins ago
The words of wisdom are here. According to Reggie-Fills Aime, the PS3 and Xbox 360 aren't the main competitors, are the technology and horsepower they have. He also says that they are looking to increase the techonology among them, rather than looking for success.
You might think that the main competition for Wii is Sony's PS3 or Microsoft's Xbox 360. But according to Reggie Fils-Aime, president and chief operating officer of Nintendo of America, you would be wrong.
"We dont consider just Sony and Microsoft our main competitors," Mr. Fils-Aime said in a recent interview with the New York Times. "If people decide to stay home on a Saturday night playing Wii bowling instead of going to the movies, we win. If people spend 22 minutes making their perfect Mii instead of watching a sitcom, we win."
He also reiterated the point that George Harrison recently made about fun vs. horsepower.
"Both of our competitors have focused on an old paradigm," he said. "They focused on more technological horsepower as the path to success. They fell into a trap of just listening to their core user base rather than focusing on attracting new customers."
The man certainly is not shy about his opinions, and we love him for it.
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Jun 1, 2007
Most recently commented on by on Jun 1, 2007






Comments
Flame on.
And it has some sort of "external HD" after all, you can buy the component cables.
Because graphics equal good games, right?
A decent game IS STILL A DECENT GAME. Graphics only affect looks and that's it unless it's the rare game that relies upon it. Otherwise, it will do nothing for enjoying the game. This is common sense.
"If it ain't broken, don't fix it", ring a bell anyone?
Kudos on his confident way to deliver his message, but technological advancement isin't a "trap" either, as the millions and millions of PS3 and 360 users will tell you that.
So, yes, I agree with Reggie.
Same difference.
I'm pretty sure Andy was asking for someone in the industry, NOT some other Neoseeker user. You know, someone legitimate.
The hell it does! Do you know one of the few main reasons people are afraid of being introduced to video games? THE CONTROLLER. It is simply too daunting to them because of the memorization of the position of the buttons and lack of coordination. The PS2, the Xbox, the PS3, and the 360 fall into hardcore territory.
That one is still a part of both. You're once again the fanboy here. as usual
Even Nintendo blatantly saw Sony was being overkill. And that's why they're still selling more units than the PS3 at this very moment. That wasn't luck, that was a strategy. Sony put out its info as time went on, and Nintendo decided when to come out. That is strategy.
For the sake of religious deities and Gamegrep, learn some damn grammar already. Of course we know what you meant but it makes you look stupid.
Coming from you, I'm not surprised you'd say that.
And for the two morons who gave me two thumbs down earlier, sorry, but: A console is only as good as its games, NOT GRAPHICS.
The words of Wisdom.
One other point. Graphical wonders only last a generation or less, truly great games last a lifetime, hence the numerous amounts of retro games being sold in collections and through services like Xbox live arcade and Virtual Console.
Graphical wonders only last a generation or less, truly great games last a lifetime,
Zelda OoT. It released 9 years ago and it is still a awesome game. Also, most people ignore the graphics on it.
Do you know the millions of people who love to just eat the icing? They see the icing as the major factor and then the cake is the last thing they touch...
To some the graphics really help make the game what it is, a truly great experience. Then to others, the game play is what makes the game true to them while the "pretty factor" comes second...
This entire argument is based on personal preferences...all I am trying to point out and that Reenee is one of the biggest hypocrites here in calling other people fanboys, when himself is a pretty damn big one...
Good. You realized something very important. Everyone has their own opinions.
"Reenee is one of the biggest hypocrites here in calling other people fanboys."
He pointed very important and true things, I wouldn't call him a fanboy.
Finalblade98 is a big, enormous fanboy.
Now:
Look better? You mean "3D"? And steadily improve the graphics? Honestly, what people are going in Super Smash Brothers Brawl will be the peak of rendering Mario as close to realism as possible in the Mario universe. And that just means detailed hair follicles on his head and face, and the definition of the material of his overalls: denim. Beyond that...sweet, sweet GAMEPLAY ENJOYMENT.
jeterocks, it's time to end your ignorance: An 8-bit piece of shit is a piece of shit. A 16-bit piece of shit has a bit more detail than the previous piece of shit. A 3-dimensional piece of shit is a more defined piece of shit. A lifelike piece of shit, is well, still just a piece of shit. Sure, it may be polished, but it'll do jack shit for enjoying it. :v
Andy i would suggest if you shut up, im no fanboy, and i would love for you and reenee to actually define it for me since you talk about me being one. It seems ppl nowadays claim to use the term fanboy when they have no clue what it means. Im saying that the wii is "lucky" right now, and the fact remains They have no HD so there not going to last long. Actually a generation is like a long time. Reenee your ignorance needs to end, cause you talk more crap than every here. Just like jeterocks said, your a hypocritical fanboy, and believe me i know what that terms means.
Good old Reggie with his big-ass words making it sound like the Wii is taking on the world and winning. He sure has guts.
I fail to see how "jumping onto the HD train" means an automatic fail for Nintendo, it has little relevance to many people, including myself. As some people above believe also, I choose gameplay over graphics anyday.
Avoiding the argument, bringing something totally irrelevant, not defining why it's "shit", etc. These are the qualities that make you a fanboy. I really wish you'd be banned by now.
We've proven that it's not. Shape up or, really, ship out.
NEITHER DOES THE MAJORITY OF THE WORLD.
Tell that to the positive feedback I've been getting for my logic over your you-know-what.
ELABORATE ON IT. This is exactly why you're being called out so often. What does this mean? What does it do?
"Andy i would suggest if you shut up, im no fanboy, and i would love for you and reenee to actually define it for me since you talk about me being one."
Off course, no one is going to admit that he/she is a fanboy. You have also called me fanboy before, in the post that said that Sony is getting sued because of Blu-Ray, then how about if YOU define it for us?
One more thing, I am not a Nintendo fanboy, I actually like the PS3. But I just heard negative things from it, and from many different sources. The PSP is good, I have it, but I just like 3 games of it.
We are just pointing out the truth, and YOU should FACE IT. The PS3 IS LOSING. THE WII IS BEATING THE PS3. Just face the truth, and everyone will be happy.
STOP CALLING ME A FANBOY, YOU ARE THE ONLY FANBOY. Tell me where I have bashed another system? I NEVER BASHED A SYSTEM. I have seen you bashing other systems. I remember you said "The DS Sucks, the PSP owns all
Want more? I will get all the proof here and you will shut up then. I will take screenshots if necessary.
What's your definition of losing...sales? Point voided really. You go ahead and ask any PS3 user if they regret ever spending their money on it, when a console fails to entertain majority of its users, THEN it's a failure. Because it's not selling doesn't really have a point...here's the thing, it's expensive as hell and a lot of people don't believe it's worth it...then again, it's THOSE people that call the PS3 a failure.
Now, let me ask you, do you consider the Gamecube a failure? Many do, yet there are plenty of people, including me, who enjoyed the system heavily. Yet it held little market share, hence it is considered a failed system. You can argue (and I would agree) it is far to early to call anything a failure, but sales are a definite determiner to a systems success or failure.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.