A Rant On Bosses: Final Fantasy & Shank
13 hours 57 mins ago
Valve's Doug Lombardi says that their latest PS3 game production have been inferior to the original releases. They said they won't develop a new game until they have the ability to form a PS3 team that would be able to make the same type of products for the PS3 and PS2 that works the same as their games in 360 and PC.
"We look at it as if we were customers of this product, how would we want to be treated and what sort of product would we want out of it?
We've run a couple of experiments over the years of PlayStation in general; we did Half-Life on PS2 with an outside company and then we did Orange Box PS3 with an outside company. We weren't able to deliver the same type of product on PS3 and PS2 for that matter that we were on the 360 and PC.
Until we have the ability to get a PS3 team together, until we find the people who want to come to Valve or who are at Valve who want to work on that, I don't really see us moving to that platform.
We've kind of learned a lesson in that again, if we were customers of that product on PlayStation, we'd feel like we sort of got the stepchild version of the product while the guys on the PC and the 360 got the sweet version of it."
News story attached to:
- The Orange Box [PC, XBOX360, PS3]






Comments
They've always had something going on, but not enough to actually throw down a full team. If you follow their dev papers there are many things they've already inspected.
And the PR guys weren't speaking about how Valve hates the PS3. That was the fanboys and media purposely misconstruing what they said. Aside from when it came to Gabe, of course xD
"We won't develop for the PS3. It's too hard to develop."
"Well yeah okay we're going to put together a PS3 team."
"We've halted PS3 development until we get a team together."
They seem to be sticking to the same theme: Getting a PS3 Team together. However, it just makes it FEEL flip-floppy, "I don't like the PS3. The PS3 is okay. Well we've always liked the PS3 but we're waiting for a team."
Just because the common factor of those quotes is Valve, to one degree or another, doesn't mean that they represent Valve as a whole in the slightest. People need to learn a little more before judging, because now the internet is rampant with people who think Valve as a company are anti-PS3, be it in personal attitude or speaking business-wise, which is just unparalleled levels of wrong.
And I know that they were simply one (or a few) and not the whole of Valve. It's like I said though, they stuck to the same thing: Developing for the PS3 when a PS3 team is put together. However, the FEEL of the different things being said in the Media about Valve, makes it FEEL wishy-washy or flip-floppy whichever you'd use.
As far as I personally know, Valve considers the PS3 hard to develop for, therefore are putting together a PS3 team who can better dev for it, and will start developing for the PS3 once that team is together. Nothing wrong with that, nothing seems to be flip-flopping. I was talking about the general PR feeling of everything. Not what it actually is.
And that isn't the PR feeling, that's the media and public's misconceptions. Don't get me wrong, I can understand why you think this and I'm not trying to call you stupid or anything, but without clarification what you said was ignorant, be it due to misleading news articles and public opinions or not.
What I said, which unfortunately seems to have initiated a large debate that I have yet to have involvement in until now, is that I believe [now] that Valve really wanted to have a skilled PS3 team from the beginning, and was just being masked by some rather unsightly media PR statements.
The throwing about of the word ignorant, and subsequent squabbling, is really quite unnecessary.
One white person said black people should be killed. Does that represent all white people? Of course not. To group in Valve as anti-PS3 because of what one Valve worker has said is ignorant, no matter how you look at it.
And I believe I was replying to HisServant, not you, so how you started this debate I don't know. In fact to say that is very arrogant. =/
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.