Voice Actor Comments on Mass Effect 3: Extended Cut DLC
20 hours 21 mins ago
Quantic Dream's David Cage recently recommended that gamers only play through Heavy Rain once, claiming that "I think playing it several times is also a way to kill the magic of it". Go to the source for the full article.
Playing the game through multiple times, even with the prospect of different endings, is a bad idea according to David Cage.
"I would like people to play it once … because that’s life. Life you can only play once … I would like people to have this experience that way," explains Cage. "I’m fine with [people reloading saves to avoid bad endings], but the right way to enjoy Heavy Rain is really to make one thing because it’s going to be your story. It’s going to be unique to you. It’s really the story you decided to write … I think playing it several times is also a way to kill the magic of it."
News story attached to:
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Sep 3, 2009
Most recently commented on by on Sep 3, 2009




Comments
But even if we assume the game is worthwhile despite a single playthrough, what about players who just want to see the different endings? Eh, thanks for the suggestion, Cage, but no thanks.
I have no doubt this game will be really great; however, given all the hype and news flooding in, I'm inclined to think it's gonna wind up on "top overrated games" lists after its release.
The magic from the first playthrough will stay no matter how many times I go through the game, even if the next few are not quite as good.
Oh really? And here I thought I could choose to play games and avoid that awful mess.
Play once only though? Yeah, decent reasoning I suppose, but practically dumb, and there's lots of games keep their magic for multiple play throughs.
This game will garner so much hate because it's different and that is a shame as David Cage is one of the only men in gaming today that wants a better gaming world. He doesn't care if he wastes $200 million to prove gaming has more depth than a meathead with bulky armor swearing alot and chopping up aliens with a chainsaw gun. Gaming cannot exist with rehashing of ideas like that Cage is traying to change that.
The point is any story-heavy game can't have the magic of it ruined by having more than one play through. It's not about a different game design or anything like that; at the end of the day it's still a game and if they can't find a way to have replay-ability without ruining the most important aspect, the story, then that is bad game design. The fact it's different to the average aim and shoot circle jerk is irrelevant.
I'm not arguing against there being replayability, let me make that clear, I'm saying that if a game can't stay 'magic' if it's played through more than once then the creators must have messed something up along the way.
I'm not saying that what you're saying is impossible, I'm saying that if (IF) what Cage speaks is truth (which at the moment is most likely) then there is a pretty big flaw (or a number of them) with the game. IF.
People like Gears of War. I'm sorry. It's a great game. I know it's difficult for you to play FPSs with your monocle on, but Jesus, relax.
I want and have defended Heavy Rain and I never understood the hate. Now I do. Stuck up prick fans of the game like you.
At the end of the day all I am trying to do is allow people to think about the variables of this game. It's not a normal game, but whatever. I really don't have to do this and if it annoys you that much I really won't do it. It's less effort on my part to stop posting on a message board on the topic of Heavy Rain. Really I am not stuck up nor am I a prick so resorting to useless insults is degrading yourself i'm afraid. Ah well..
you heard it here. heavy rain = your life. video games = life. SEMPER GAME.
You have to realize, the way this game is made is like a movie that YOU make the moral choices based off of what YOU would do. He wants to make the game provide you with a story that is unique to YOU, basically drawing you into the game itself. Replaying it would mean that you are just . . . playing the game, like a game, instead of like a move where the choices are based off of what you would do.
All he is doing is suggesting it . . . no need to lynch the guy!
Yeah I'm sure we'll all play multiple times. Usually I play a game only once, but with the story being so flexible like that, I'll play probably for each and every different choice there is, just to see what happens (or until I figure out the coding and how the story warps so that I know what will happen with the choices without having to play it to find out, because I'm sure it's not so in depth that you can't figure it out).
Is he stupid for making a STATEMENT like that? No. He has a point and just wants his game to be enjoyed the most it possibly can. Am I going to lose the magic of the game if I play more than once? Probably. But that happens after most things. The first time you watch a movie is great, and consecutive times usually lose it's splendor. Same with a book and all that stuff. But that's just one of those obvious things! I'll still remember the game for that first time of playing it. But my curiosity (and desire to get the most for my buck) requires multiple playthroughs.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.