A new Call of Duty has been announced for 2012 and Activision have given some...
11 hours 39 mins ago
The first Assassin's Creed sold millions and met with some generally favourable reviews. They had positive and negative things. But it seemed like the negatives were more noticeable. And the dev's noticed and promised to fix some of the problems with the first game. But a German Magazine company was told by Ubisoft to give the game a high score or they will not receive an early copy. They refused to do so as they believed in integrity (way to go!). But this begs the question, did Ubisoft do the same thing with other pro reviewers?
We hear about these situations far too much, where a publisher is accused of attempting to broker a guaranteed favorable review from a press outlet. The latest to face such allegations is Ubisoft, having been named and shamed by German magazine Computer Bild Spiele for demanding a high score for Assassin's Creed 2. SCANDAL!
News story attached to:





Comments
Still, major props to that magazine for having the guts to take a stand.
Seriously not suprised about this. Ubisoft is the worst videogame company in the world. They are just so lazy. They don't care about their games they just care about making money.
The review had lots of slurping in it -- apparently the only downside is "having to wait for a sequel."
It's understandable, Assassin's Creed was fundamentally a very good game, but after playing it for awhile it gets repetitive. If someone even hints at the sequel having the same problem it could be pretty bad for them.
I think they pretty much want to know if the reviewer is out to prove their game bad, or just out to put out an honest opinion.
If they were paying for good reviews, it'd be a different story though.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.