221

Why The PS3 Does Not Share The Xbox 360's Success

Supernouva | June 28, 2007 | News | Playstation 3 
Why isn't the PS3 sharing the Xbox 360's success? You can't deny that the PS3 hasn't been doing so well lately, despite how good a console it is. Of course, the main attributing factor is that it hasn't been selling very well, at least not compared to the Wii and Xbox 360.

BTW, this isn't a PS3 bashing article.
There are two reasons why the former frame of thinking is incorrect: First, the market was very different one year ago. The Xbox 360 was competing with the hype of the PlayStation 3, the shadow of the then-labeled Nintendo “Revolution” and decent PS2 and Xbox software sales. Second, sales for the Xbox 360 and Wii are continuously picking up, while the PS3 sales are continuously declining.

In the instance of the first reason, competition has a lot to do with console sales. During the first six months of the Xbox 360's release, it was nearly on-par to where the PS3 is now, but did so with poor shipments. Sony’s shipment errs were over with by mid-December of 2006. Microsoft’s shipment woes carried over into March of 2006. However, the 360 had picked up sales drastically in June, and by September the Xbox 360 was already at 2.7 million units sold and planted in North America. Hence, the 360 was not falling into the same pit as the PS3, six months into its release. And as mentioned above, people didn’t have the competitive incline to buy the 360 at the time. It was the same for the PS2 during its first six-months after launch – a lack of competition (plus, the Dreamcast was dead right out of the gate) only had the PS2 with steady sales gains (but never a decline like the PS3). But once the Xbox and Gamecube came along, the PS2 was already shifting massive amounts of consoles every month, even up until now.

Alternatively, the PS3, in its seventh month, has barely surpassed the 1.5 million mark in North America. While some may say that’s not a big deal in comparison to the Xbox 360 sales last year...only shifting 80k units a month is a big deal. It’s a sad deal. But it’s not like these numbers are just a one-time deal; the PlayStation 3 has started a new trend of shifting only 80,000 units a month, for the past few months. By September, the PS3 will not have a 2.7 million installed unit base in North America, if it continues its downward sales trend.

What’s worse, though, is that this is the peak of the starting gate race in this newest generation of consoles and the PS3 is suffering from a lack of software, original content and hardware sales. Not only that, the software that is available for the PS3 didn’t even make the top ten on the NPD charts for April or May. Ouch!

As stated near the top of the article, one of the other main reasons why the PS3 isn’t being looked upon as a success is because during this extremely competitive console race, the Wii and Xbox 360 are in high-demand. There’s no excuse why people shouldn’t be demanding the PS3. There’s no excuse why Sony – who had one extra year to prep for this scenario – is letting the situation slip down the drain for their console. During this same period of last year, Microsoft was throwing every marketing tactic they could at consumers – it was a triple-threat of Xbox Live, several big games being released each month, (i.e., including games like The Outfit, Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter and Dead Rising throughout the summer) and M$ didn’t hesitate to promote the heck out of anything they thought could ring in a dime or dollar.

News Story attached to:
32 comments | go to source (www.cinemablend.com) | Add to favorites! favourite this article | send to friend
Register as a member to subscribe comments.

Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

  • 0 thumbs!
    Final Blade | June 28, 2007
    you see there is one flaw in this article xbox eventually got better games by the summer. and the ps3 has some great games coming out in the few weeks. So basically the only thing different is the demand. And there is a reason the ps3 doesn't have alot of the games that it needs. Xbox needs better games to come back against the wii and ps3. Right now.
    And the fact they don't want to pay 600 dollars for a system that is really a bargain. Though Heh the ps3 is a 10 year console so i don't see how this effects anyone other than the now. However You can play your ps2 titles on your ps3 so why not get the newer.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Enhance | June 28, 2007
      quote
      Though Heh the ps3 is a 10 year console so i don't see how this effects anyone other than the now.
      That statement is a total bs even if Sony has said it themselves. Heck next year someone could create a processor that is ten times faster than the one in the PS3 at 1/2 the cost and then the PS3 will have to be replaced. In these times with the growth of technology you can't say any electronic device will last with its current technology for more than 2 years at most.
      • 0 thumbs!
        Final Blade | June 28, 2007
        Well in order for that to happen it needs to be powerful then the cell. and currently nothing is more powerful than it. Though the reason some dont see it, cause developers arent utilizing the processor to its maximum. And what makes you so sure that sony doesnt make an even more powerful cell. I read a month or two go They were going to make an even more powerful and cheaper cell prozessor that will help the ps3 cheapen in price. So i see your statement as flawed. How long did the ps2 last. Hmm well roughly 6 or 7 years. Thats close to 10. What makes you so sure this wont last long. The sony systems are always a better system in the long run. Hell the ps2 had just as many problems during its few months of it being release as the ps3 is. And look how great that that system turned out.
        • -1 thumbs!
          Reenee | June 28, 2007
          quote
          you see there is one flaw in this article xbox eventually got better games by the summer. and the ps3 has some great games coming out in the few weeks.
          You're comparing the proven to the potential. I hear Lair and Heavenly Sword got a bit of a butchering. Only Warhawk got better.

          quote
          And the fact they don't want to pay 600 dollars for a system that is really a bargain.
          You're comparing a game system (360) to a budget Blu-Ray player, which has yet to prove itself. Is that Hologram discs I see in the distance, by the way? Flash memory?

          quote
          What makes you so sure this wont last long.
          A lot of things. Don't turn a blind eye to the obvious. Blu-Ray is one of the faults. That was shoved down our throats, not asked for.

          quote
          The sony systems are always a better system in the long run.
          You're only two for two. I was around for both and Sony did a complete about-face. Their PR are dipshits for saying lies and stupid statements. Lately, though, they've been quiet.
        • -2 thumbs!
          Final Blade | June 28, 2007
          Reenee If only you knew facts. There not shoving anyone to get blu-ray there making better systems. Blu-ray is better than HD-DVD. And so far other than the U.S, its raping HD-DVD and selling on top in a landslide.
      • 0 thumbs!
        joshthegreat | June 28, 2007
        The PS3 could easily be a 10 year console, just as the PS1 was, and the PS2 will become. Sony don't mean that they wont bring another system out in this time, just that they expect PS3s to be selling in 10 years time.
  • 0 thumbs!
    FRoGBuster | June 28, 2007
    That's true, XBOX's life span is no longer than a year either because of microsoft's own support for its own system, or the BOX's capability to support itself before it dies by the three red lights.
    However, we know the PS3 will survive and be supported longer than the BOX by looking at history. Also, there are a lot of people like me waiting at the second tier gates to rush at the PS3 and purchase one was soon as the price drops, no hesitation. I've got my money stashed and waiting.
  • 1 thumbs!
    Existenz | June 28, 2007
    The article is skewed i mean the Playstation 3 is doing just as well as the Xbox 360 was after 6 months on the market, has just as many games as the Xbox 360 did in 6 months on the market, and right now if games developed for the PS3 continue it will have 380 games by the same point the Xbox 360 only had 144 games, the Playstation 3 is on course as always to be the dominant console, the PS1 did and the PS2 did... And they now have 240 million consoles sold combined.
    • -3 thumbs!
      Final Blade | June 28, 2007
      Finally someone here who isnt a complete xbox fanboy or getting there facts screwed up. I said the same thing.
      • -2 thumbs!
        nflsmc | June 28, 2007
        Now if we could just get someone who isn't a complete sony fanboy who doesn't listen to other people's arguments because he/she thinks that they're always right.
        • -4 thumbs!
          Final Blade | June 28, 2007
          I have no idea what your refering to im agreeing with him. I do listen to other ppl arguments. Its only when stuff like this gets flawed.
        • 0 thumbs!
          neto_360 | June 28, 2007
          Seriously. He is talking to you finalblade. No matter what people say, they are wrong. Well, that is how you see it. All you do is point out "flaws" of the 360 and never the good in an attempt to make the PS3 look greater than it is. You don't say any facts, just random fanboy crap.
  • -3 thumbs!
    Reenee | June 28, 2007
    The PS3 currently ISN'T doing as well as it should. Look at its Japan numbers. It's being dominated IN ITS HOME TERRITORY.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Existenz | June 29, 2007
      I wouldn't necessarily agree, The Playstation 3 is doing better than it's predecessors at the 6 month mark, yes you can claim that the Playstation 1 was new no one really had a clue about it apart from it was expensive, though the Playstation 2 wasn't people new the Playstation name by that point and that console struggled off the starting grid even without competition.

      There are a lot of factors as to why the Playstation 3 isn't doing aswell in Japan alot of them are Wii related, but like the Xbox 360 the Playstation 3 currently isn't releasing anything that Japanese gamers will jump and shout about, that will change but until that happens America and Europe will be the consoles key markets and with 4.4 million units sold already it is on a steady path.
  • -3 thumbs!
    Tribulation | June 28, 2007
    [b][/b]360 > PS3. Get over it.
    • -1 thumbs!
      Reenee | June 28, 2007
      Hush. The PS3 isn't worth it NOW. Just wait and see. Even I'm a PS3 naysayer and abide by that.
  • 1 thumbs!
    skittles07 | June 28, 2007
    The PS3 isn't doing as well because it costs more. There is a lot more stuff that makes it worth the $600 but a lot of people aren't interested it that. They only want to play games.
  • 0 thumbs!
    SuggZugg | June 28, 2007
    The PS3 isn't doing well cause it costs way too much, not that I'm saying that Sony isn't a good company I mean I love their TV's and the PSP, PS2 also but they always push the price of their murchandise. 360 of course is a fair price for its quality.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Subtle Demise | June 28, 2007
    It's silly how every article about a specific system or systems always seems to attract idiotic system wars.

    There are a couple reasons for the PS3's lack of demand. The first and most major being the price. The second reason is the relatively small collection of games. The 360 was the first next-gen console on the market, and has had time to build a sizable collection of games, and the Wii got a lot of ports shortly after its release, whereas PS3's collection is still quite small, but at least it can play PS1 and PS2 games to tide its owners over for a while until a better selection of games is released. I still say the system's sales will rise dramatically with the release of Metal Gear Solid 4, which could very well be PS3's killer app.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Daisy | June 28, 2007
    With the stories of the Red Ring of Death and how many people are returning their consoles for repair, I wonder just what Xbox considers "success"?

    Units Sold does not equal success when 3/4 of them are being returned for repair.

    (I'm exaggerating the numbers, by the way, even though it's looking lately like that might not be an exaggeration in the near future)
  • 0 thumbs!
    Reenee | June 28, 2007
    finalblade, you can't understand that nothing on the PS3 is justified by that $600 pricetag.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Guticb | June 29, 2007
      Calling All Cars, Motorstorm, Resistance, Lair, Super Stardust HD, and folding@home are perfect justification.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Final Blade | June 29, 2007
    Oh im fully aware why it is. Unlike some i have been doing info and research(some may call it a waste)since 2001. B4 any real person knew about it. Except the devs. I fully know and accept the price. And unlike some i saved my money and got it. Its called steping up to the plate and doing something.

    Neto i know he was talking to me the fact remains that i was agreeing with Existenz. And also i didnt state any flaws of the xbox only the article get your facts straight. How about reading my and the first post. You see im saying xbox got better games as time went by. And that it was in the same boat as the ps3 is in 4 months of release.
  • 0 thumbs!
    neto_360 | June 29, 2007
    I'm not just talking about here finalblade. I have been reading through other threads, like the ones in the General PS3 forum, and you are such a damn fanboy it is almost sad.

    quote
    How about reading my and the first post
    How about you learn to type?
    • 0 thumbs!
      Final Blade | June 29, 2007
      Really, since you don't even comment in that topic. You wouldn't know what i say later. And like most i bet you don't read my post. Find a few words and claim to know what i mean. Me type Yea funny, if you took the time to stop being rude and mean towards me and actually start asking what i mean maybe you would get what i mean. Instead of claiming your better than me. All you do is call me names and such and for what, cause you think you know more than me. or better than me. I don't have to type the way you want so that you can think other wise. We are people how about trying to be friends and stop this annoying crap that is going on. I have said nothing to you and yet here you are claiming to know that im a fanboy. There is a difference of being a fanboy and being a fan. I am a fan. If i had 2,000+ dollars i would get all three systems. But i favor the ps3 cause im a fan of sony. Just cause i may say something like the wii is lame and such im speaking in terms of advance technology. so i leave you off with this im tired of this crap. How about you be nice to me. Cause this so called attitude is uncalled for.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Gothic Girl | June 29, 2007
    As alot have people have already said, the PS3's price is one of the main factors that puts people off. Quite frankly, I don't care if the $600 is cheap for a "home entertainment system", because I don't want a "home entertainment system". I only want a game console. And I'm sure many other people feel the same way.

    ... plus, I have A LOT more things I'd rather spend $600 on.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Final Blade | June 29, 2007
      Well its not that im mad about its the fact some ppl dont save their money. I mean you have these people who talk about the consoles left and right claiming to be all knowing about consoles parts and such. You would think that they shouldn't be surprised about the price. I mean yea some dont want the ps3 for entertainment purposes. But correct me if im wrong but didnt ppl glorify the the first xbox cause you can play and store songs and such in the system. Thats basically an entertainment system too. But now the ps3 has it and ppl are like its not that great. I find that ironic. And yea its mainly the price and lack of games. Though there starting to get some good ones now.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Synthesis | June 29, 2007
    People need to calm down, it's just a system jeez.
  • 0 thumbs!
    LOD-squa | June 29, 2007
    Agreed with Gothic Girl. If I wanted a home entertainment system I wouldn't be going after the PS3.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Final Blade | June 29, 2007
      Dont you mean if you wanted one you would go after the ps3.
  • -1 thumbs!
    neto_360 | June 29, 2007
    I could have $1000 dollars in my pocket and still not want to buy a PS3. I eventually will, but it is not on the top of my list of things to buy. It isn't just the PS3 you need to buy. You can't get the full effect of a PS3 without having the right TV, which costs money, and you have to buy that stupid cord for HD, which cost even more money. Not everyone is willing to dish out that much, no matter how much stuff the PS3 can do. All I want is a game console.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Final Blade | June 30, 2007
      Um not all at once. If they did that then im sorry they're crazy. You get them in steps.
      You buy one thing at a time. Wow something so simple turns into so complicated and stupid.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.

Submit Newshelp

Top Contributors

This Month
chautemoc 1610 pts
Akira_EX 1553 pts
Tyranitar24 1437 pts
Gothic Girl 1433 pts
Deathsythe 728 pts
Silver Mir.. 721 pts
Cruxis Mana 676 pts
Linkin Par.. 653 pts
Krunal 583 pts
tidus04 526 pts
All-Time
Gothic Girl 18126 pts
Krunal 12221 pts
Linkin Par.. 10183 pts
chautemoc 9415 pts
Final Blade 9136 pts
Silver Mir.. 8753 pts
xsynergyx 7909 pts
mistermostyn 7668 pts
Akira_EX 7610 pts
Tyranitar24 6674 pts

Stats

Today
Published News: 1
Comments: 17
Points Given: 54
Users Registered: 0
This Month
Published News: 628
Comments: 4530
Points Given: 10407
Users Registered: 49
All Time
Published News: 10976
Comments: 75077
Points Given: 177617
Users Registered: 569

Conventions / Trade Shows

(0.4521/d/aeon)