Square Enix recently revealed a bunch of 'fun facts' in their book "Final Fantasy XIII Scenario Ultimania", including the reason why there are essentially no towns in the game...

The game’s linearity was just because depicting towns and so on like we did before was impossible to do on an “HD” console – it was too much work.

Nomura had hardly anything to do with it; he just did character design and commercials, not even the intro or movies.

The game was designed with DLC in mind but we don’t actually have any planned.

It was easy to port to the Xbox. Porting to the PS3 is harder. The PS3 has more processing power but you have to do it properly.

Jumping was manual at first and you could jump onto the titans.

You used to be able to avoid enemy attacks in the field using the analogue stick, but due to difficulty considerations it was canned.

The battle team came up with the transforming summons. The art team was dead against them.

“I was thinking this time we would make it completely story-centric” – Toriyama.
| More
News story attached to:
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 5
    Zero and X Jan 31, 10
    Lmao, wow, at least they're honest.

    "Why wasn't this in the game?"
    "Meh, didn't feel like it"
  • 2
    Red 9* Jan 31, 10
    So they could spend five years making it, take the time to port it, but making towns is too much work?

    Wow.
    • 1
      Hideo1 Jan 31, 10
      Yeah, how dare they not include something unnecessary to the core game in spite of the fact there is so much there anyway, the lazy *bleep*s
      • 2
        Bale Fire Jan 31, 10
        The game took 5 bloody years, 5 long bloody years. Considering that kind of time I think its fair to say gamers expect Square Enix to overcome little obstacles like "Too Much Work" at certain points.

        I can understand Square Enix not including them if they truly weren't important to the plot, but it certainly doesn't speak well of the developers or the game whichever way you take it.
        • 1
          Hideo1 Feb 1, 10
          Doesn't speak well, of course not.

          Doesn't speak ill either, unless you're being dense.

          Five long bloody years it took. That means there is five long bloody years of work put into the game. So, should they make useless additions and extend the time to fit the audience's ridiculous *bleep*ing standards or should they leave it as the flowing game it is without having to run around cities and town speaking to everyone and their mother in order to move on when most of what is said is plain old bullshit.

          "I have a dog. I like dogs. Do you?"

          "Not unless it's Cerburus and it wants a fight, now get out my way bitch."

          Besides, it was mostly pricks around here who are begging for something different. A JRPG without towns to aimlessly potter around in. There you go.
        • 1
          Red 9* Feb 1, 10
          I don't mind if they had said they didn't include it because they weren't necessary; that would just be common sense as well as streamlining production.

          But too much work? So then porting the game isn't work? Unnecessary is one thing, but too much work just shows lack of dedication.
        • 1
          Miss Razz Feb 1, 10
          quote
          I don't mind if they had said they didn't include it because they weren't necessary; that would just be common sense as well as streamlining production.
          Haha. Actually, yeah, they probably should have said something like that. Better PR, at least.

          Saying "it was too much work" gives off the impression that they had towns planned for a reason, but simply couldn't be bothered adding them.
        • 0
          Hideo1 Feb 1, 10
          You're not getting the point.

          Even if they were planned originally everything else took FIVE YEARS. Do you know how long five years is in terms of game development? So, why after all of that work should they spend another few months adding in unnecessary things? I'm pretty sure if you worked for them it would be too much work for you. Hell, most devs won't even strain to the five year mark, just rashly finishing it up and packing it out half-assed after three. But is any of this acknowledged? Noooooooooo.

          If towns were necessary, they would have done the extra work. They weren't (as Shuyu pointed out, they would just be a detriment), so they were too much work to bother with.

          No wonder Squenix has been *bleep*ing up so bad lately; the fans are ridiculous.
        • 1
          Red 9* Feb 1, 10
          quote Bale Fire
          I can understand Square Enix not including them if they truly weren't important to the plot, but it certainly doesn't speak well of the developers or the game whichever way you take it.
          I believe this was the important part...
        • 0
          Hideo1 Feb 1, 10
          quote Red
          But too much work? So then porting the game isn't work?
          No, that was.

          Porting the game to 360 gets them more sales, a bigger fanbase and everything else.

          Making towns for it will push the date back and force the team to work extra for something unnecessary and that would be a detriment to the game.

          If someone says it's too much work to paint fire on the side of a bike they built, you'd think it's fair enough, because there's no great plus-side to it, it just looks a little cooler (arguably). Making an already brilliant game that they've poured so much work into look a little cooler for however long it would take to make towns is too much work.

          If you don't think that's fair enough your expectations are too high.
  • 1
    Aussie Legend Jan 31, 10
    Okay, that is just *bleep*ing stupid. What the hell is an RPG without towns to buy shit with my hard earned money
  • 2
    Shuyu Feb 1, 10
    Because it makes more sense for a bunch of persecuted fugitives to just casually stroll about.

    Oh wait, it doesn't.
  • 0
    FinalFantasyFanaticc Feb 1, 10
    Good! Towns are all well and fun but it makes sense, time for a change, lets just explore the fields and beat the crap out of monsters, not listen to how you have to find someones lost wallet ; ;
  • 1
    Aeirou Feb 1, 10
    This hurts my expectations of the game.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.