Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  0 thumbs!

  Sakura | July 16, 2007
  No way. I don't want it to be delayed. That's one of the few Playstation 3 games that I can't wait to get my hands on. Hopefully they'll somehow magically be able to push it up a little bit.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Storm | July 16, 2007
  A 40GB PS3? I don't see that doing well...because you can get that backwards-compatibility and 40+ GB with the 80GB one. I don't mind FFXIII being delayed into 2009. That'd give many enough time to get the system, and it'll be something to look forward to on the PS3 that year. PS3 achievements? Wow, what a way to go
• 
  1 thumbs!

  xsynergyx | July 16, 2007
  I don't think a 40GB PS3 would be too bad. Something cheaper for gamers who aren't too serious.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  tidus04 | July 16, 2007
  I would like this not to be true, Final Fantasy XIII being a main reason I would get the PS3. So massivly down there...
  
  As for the Ps3 wasnt they going to get rid of the 60Gb version and then in a bit make the 80Gb version become avalible for $399. If so this dose not make sence.. ?
  
  Or am I just wrong on this.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Red_Phoenix | July 16, 2007
  This really sucks I thought the PS3 was starting to kick-off,
  
  but know I'm thinking other wise.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  black_wing79 | July 17, 2007
  FFXIII is gonna take another year? that disappointing..i was waiting to get that game faster.. the 40GB sounds alright, but they should have allowed for backward compatibility...
• 
  1 thumbs!

  FRoGBuster | July 17, 2007
  dood, re-realse the 20GB PS3 WITH backwards compatability! Compatability is more important than hard disk space!
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Mr 182 | July 17, 2007
  ...why can't Sony just pick a model and stick with it?
  • 
    1 thumbs!

    Subzer0 | July 17, 2007
    Seriously! They get rid of the 60GB and replace it with the 40GB. They'll get rid of it too before we know it but like someone said. It's good for those who just want to play the ps3 without having GB issues.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Existenz | July 17, 2007
    *cough* Microsoft... They have like 4 SKU's... No HDD, 20Gb, 120Gb and Halo, don't see others complaining and Microsoft's No HDD SKU is a thorn in that consoles side.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Final Blade | July 17, 2007
  As of right now, the 40GB thing is a rumor. As for the FF13 being delayed thats good that it is, i mean they said its a mess, that shows you they really care to make it a great game and not a piece of crap. I fully support this as long as the game turns into a great thing.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Silver Mirror | July 17, 2007
  I doubt they would announce a 40GB version before they have even phased out the 60GB version
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Gothic Girl | July 17, 2007
  Haha, I was right all along! FFXIII isn't being released until the end of '08.
  I agree with Finalblade ... I'd rather have Squeenix take their time on it, and "perfect" it, and release it late ... as opposed to them rushing it, and ending up with a bad/glitchy game.
  
  - - -
  
  As for the 4ogig PS3 ... well this sounds like another stupid idea on Sony's part, especially since it isn't backwards compatible.
  To be honest, I wouldn't care if they completely take out the Blu Ray Player, and just give me complete backwards compatibility.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  ZhaoYun88 | July 17, 2007
  Where getting pathetic now, i have used 20GB already in my PS3, whats the point in 20GB and 40GB, i understand the 80GB as people store lots of music on there PS3 as well as Images, Videos they have downloaded and Demo's/full game. With them also reducing the cost of the 60GB i dont see why they would risk another console just 20GB short that cant do that much
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Revenger of Wastelan | July 17, 2007
  40GB PS3 would be nice, but the fact that there is no backwards compatibility will get it out of the list.