PSN to SEN: Time to rage quit? - DarkFeed
17 hours 59 mins ago
A Massachusetts paper accuses BioShock of its gameplay, saying that gamers have a choice of either killing 'Little Sisters' for maxed out strength or saving them, but only getting half of killing them. Some gamers are a bit uncomfortable going around killing little girls and this could arouse some problems since if you spare them, you'll be half as successful. What do you do?
Rather than marginalize gaming as a weapon of mass destruction, the article accurately describes the gameplay in which players decide if they want to terminate the "Little Sisters" for maximum strength, or rescuing the little boogers for only half the "serum."
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Aug 26, 2007
Most recently commented on by on Aug 26, 2007








Comments
If you have a major problem with the game, don't play it. If you can't follow that advice, then please, go put yourself in a mental hospital and request a straight-jacket and a lot of meds.
JT type people.
Jesus, it's a video game. Video games are just that... games. Playing Monopoly doesn't make me want to have an imperium on the world. Playing this won't make me kill little girls. I hope.
What are you really asking when you are trying to distinguish which you are comfortable killing and which you are not?
I'm not sure if I'll ever get this game...maybe if I can get it on the cheap...
But I saw the vid featuring these girls...I don't think normal little girls have glowing eyes neh?
I heard that, even when you try to 'save' them, they still die anyhow?
I didn't harvest any Little Sisters, The rewards for saving them outweigh the extra ADAM you recieve. I don't like to kill innocents in games. I however never had any complaint about blowing the litte bastards in Fallout 2 up, you know the ones in The Den that pickpocket you at most doors. Ticking dynamite + Thief child = win.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.