Call of Duty Black Ops Voted ‘Best Game Ending’ Of All Time
19 hours 54 mins ago
Ever since that jerk Ebert started preaching that videogames aren't art there have been several attemps to prove him wrong. Here is a list of 10 videogams which could be considered art
1 Bioshock
2 Shadow of the Colussus/ICO
3 Okami
4 Psychonauts
5 Black and White
6 American McGee's Alice
7 Metal Gear Solid
8 Rez
9 Eternal Sonata
10 Takeshi's 'Challenge
Games as art
Video games are a viable artistic medium, capable of presenting both superficial beauty and deep commentary. Here are 10 video games that can be considered, for various reasons, works of art.
Latest comment:
Most recently commented on by on Sep 2, 2007
Most recently commented on by on Sep 2, 2007







Comments
Related artists: Ayn Rand, Hector Guimard
Oh i love how they have used this vibrant pink to craft this rather unique block of bubblegum, the sudden machine cut ends and the rather tame outer wrapping just adds to the shock factor the pink delivers...
Please anything could be talked about in an artistic light, that doesn't mean they are art though.
Of course, any "games are art" discussion has to be preceded by finding a definition for art itself. In my view, art is anything that makes a statement about the human condition.
Going by this definition of art, games like Okami and BioShock aren't art. They're visually pleasing and visually unique, but does this alone make them art? Nope. If we also go by my definition, you could argue The Sims is an example of a game as art - certainly, not many games comment on the human condition quite as well (rampant consumerism, vanity, status anxiety, and insecurity - particularly in matters of the heart).
But then that's the problem - there are so many possible definitions of art, that these lists are usually void before they're even published. Art means different things to different people.
Here endeth the rant.
I've only watched a bit, but I'd have to agree with the nomination of Bioshock. It's quite cool, very with the time frame it was set in, and the characters have a lot of personality to them. The fight scene against the surgeon? I'll remember that scene forever, tbqh. The name Bioshock doesn't really do it justice; just call it 'Rapture' and get people intrigued.
Shadows of the Colossus was quite artsy as well, but it wasn't really that immersive. You don't really have to pay attention to back story, your location, the subtble nuances of the boss fights and their personalities; you're just taking a long time to kill very large bosses. Each boss is stylish in their own way, but Bioshock really sets a better mood and is more immersive.
Visually, it was nice, and it had some style, but in that sense it isn't visually artistic like Okami is. It's artistic in another sense, a rare one that few directors besides Kojima have ever pulled off.
Having Bioshock at first is a bit of a stretch, but I agree that it is a work of art in it's own right. Absolutely amazing game, and it deserved a spot in the top 10 list. Rapture's cityscape alone deserves awards, it was one of the best I have ever seen out of any medium, whether it be paintings, games or otherwise. It had some amazing visual art, as well as an atmosphere that few games compare to. I actually muted the game for a while
Again, another shitty list.
gd news tho. lolol not!
But from what I heard of say...Ico, I would have to agree that it is art...Ditto with Okami...But I don't think that Bioshock deserves first place..Though it might deserve a place...
Art is really subjective, and can encompass many sorts of qualities that can judge it as 'art'...
Visual (being a graphical masterpiece, or simply having a more unique visual quality...Okami is an example of the latter)
Immersive - How well the object d'art draws you into it...does the storyline, and gameplay just suck you in, and take you to a fantasy/surreal world? Is it so 'ultrarealistic' that you feel 'part' of the experience? Does it emulate it's 'world' in a very believable fashion?
There are more ways of qualifying something as art...and of course, people's opinions are a big part of it...
But how much one can take out of something, and how much one can put in, are in a sense, one and the same. And so, by my view it is very easy for me to see how so many different can see things in different ways
A MAN CREATES.
A PARASITE ASKS, "Where is my share?"
And Steinman's recording about Picasso and surgery was *bleep*ing awesome
AMAZING stuff, and I'm still not done with it. Just got to Frolic Front or something.
Shadow of the Collosus deserves a 2nd place, it showed great graphics and art structure, but BioShock was too great for SoC.
Going by this definition of art, games like Okami and BioShock [see my self-correcting comment below - BioShock does actually say quite a bit about the human condition] aren't art. They're visually pleasing and visually unique, but does this alone make them art? Nope. If we also go by my definition, you could argue The Sims is an example of a game as art - certainly, not many games comment on the human condition quite as well (rampant consumerism, vanity, status anxiety, and insecurity - particularly in matters of the heart).
But then that's the problem - there are so many possible definitions of art, that these lists are usually void before they're even published. Art means different things to different people.
Here endeth the rant.
This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.