Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  0 thumbs!

  Silver Mirror | September 08, 2007
  And we care about this because?
  
  Multiplayer in Bioshock would probably be nothing more than a add on which would take away from the seriousness of the Singleplayer
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Gogetenks | September 08, 2007
  I don't know why people expect multiplayer in every first person game. Bioshock focuses on exploring a gorgeous underwater city and messing around with weird powers that nobody else has. Metroid Prime 3 focuses on exploring various planets, investigating disappearances and, again, dealing with weird powers (although a number of enemies have a limited version of it). Neither needs multiplayer, neither would really work out in a multiplayer game mostly due to the weapons and gameplay. They are designed for the single player mode.
  
  I'm happy with them both being singe player only, and I love both of them to death. Easily the greatest two games of the year so far, by a large margin. Two deep, polished single player mode is better than a shallow multiplayer mode. Without a doubt, sacrificed would have had to be made to get one. Shoot 'em ups and other action games need multiplayer, but games that thrive on their atmosphere and isolation do not.
• 
  2 thumbs!

  volacide | September 08, 2007
  Are we just supposed to post our comments about agreeing with this?
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Final Blade | September 08, 2007
  Well same can be said about halo 3 Gogetenks. Halo 3 can also be able to explore the storyline. I think Bioshock could use a muliplayer if they actually take the time to make it good. Just because there past experiences wasn't all great doesn't mean they should just stop. An example is DMC2. We all know the people who played it said it sucked very bad, did that tell capcom to stop, no. They continued and made a awesome DMC3 game. And no doubt DMC4 for will be the killer title to surpass DMC1.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Ameer | September 09, 2007
    You're comparing the quality of Halo 3's storyline to that of Bioshock.
    
    It don't compare, therefore, you can't employ your 'one size fits all' approach.
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      Final Blade | September 09, 2007
      Im not comparing quality so your point is Moot. I was saying that People play Halo for the story the same way as Bioshock, And afterwards People would like to play the multiplayer.
      
      Its a general statement. There will be differences in story thats obvious but im was not referring about the differences. Not every Halo fan plays for the Multiplayer. Me being one of them, but i will play Multi if im at my friends or bored and want to play a game like Halo.
      • 
        0 thumbs!

        Ameer | September 09, 2007
        Why do I bother trying to instill intelligence into an empty shell?
      • 
        0 thumbs!

        Final Blade | September 09, 2007
        Maybe you don't get what i mean, if so than thats ok.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Miller | September 08, 2007
  Anyone who says Bioshock Multiplayer would be bad needs to play a 4 player System Shock 2 LAN.
• 
  -1 thumbs!

  PANDADjCK | September 08, 2007
  If you think this game need multiplayer then you my friend are a noob.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  ConkerASkyJockey | September 09, 2007
  Some games, like BioShock. Don't need multiplayer.
  
  Why? They are more focused on its single player mode. Halo 2 had multiplayer, its was very good but its single player wasn't enjoyable as Halo: CE.
  
  Multiplayer is a large potion to a game, but if you want a decent single player. Its better that it lays off with less attention.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  regice | September 11, 2007
  the game is so amazing and no multiplayer?too bad...