Jack's at it... AGAIN?

Apparently the ESRB is to blame for Best Buy's alleged selling of M rated games to minors OVER THE INTERNET. How is the ESRB responsible for Best Buy's "illegal" practices? All they do is play the game to determine the rating a game should receive. It has nothing to do with Best Buy, Jackie. If you want to go after the ESRB and dig your grave deeper, here's a novel idea: Why don't you file a separate suit?

Oh, wait... You know that won't get you anywhere so you try to add them as an accomplice in your lawsuit against Best Buy. Way to go, dumbass.

Thompson issued a press release yesterday, stating that he had indeed filed the suit in the Miami-Dade County Circuit Court and providing a case number (07-36080).

As we reported, the claim against Best Buy suit looks as if it will be going nowhere. Thompson has also apparently named the ESRB in the suit. That looks like a non-starter as well. His explanation:

The ESRB has been sued by Thompson because it is well known that it a) is owned and operated by the video game industry, b) does not even play the games it rates to conclusion, c) routinely mislabels games as to age appropriateness, per testimony before the U.S. Congress, and is engaged in representations to American parents that the age label are accurate and are keeping “Mature” games out of the hands of kids…

Chaos Swordsman via gamepolitics.com »