384

80GB PS3 to be phased out, leaving only 40GB?

Guticb | November 23, 2007 | News | Playstation 3 
When the 80GB Playstation 3 came out, rumors started spreading that the 60GB system would be phased out. Not much time later, the 60GB system was phased out. Now, Steve Foster, Sales and Marketing Manager of Sony Computer Entertainment of Europe is saying that the 80GB system will soon be phased out, citing that it is too expensive to have many variants of a system in production. This would leave only the $399 system.
"The model of choice, going forward, is going to be the 40GB," said Foster. "So when you say the 60GB is going to be phased out, that is absolutely correct. And our manufacturing plant has already stopped production of 60GB..." He goes on to confirm this is a "worldwide" decision.

Obviously, this means many of the features we originally saw in the 60GB model aren't going to be around, which may puzzle some consumers. iAfrica asked Foster about those missing features, and as it turns out, he's not all that concerned and doesn't really consider them to be crucial.

"When you say "features" the key elements that are missing is going to be an element of hard drive, but that has come about because of the research that we've done as to what is the required amount that is used at this stage; the type of user that is using a PS3. And then yes, the ports have been taken out so there are only two USB ports, and then of course the memory stick ports have been taken out."

Foster confirms the reason for doing this is to cut production costs of the system: "making a PS3 in a 60GB or 80GB model is very expensive," he said. With the holidays here, Sony apparently realized they needed to cut the price, and thus, the 40GB model was born. Unfortunately for those of you with big PS2 libraries, this model in no way supports any PS2 titles, although it will support PS1 games. Foster said the only software updates that will happen in the 40GB model will be for PS1 games, and "PlayStation 2 will not be supported."

Okay, so bottom line- if you want either the 60GB model (there are a few still around) or the 80GB model, we strongly suggest you act now. Because it won't be long before there is only one option, and it's gonna be the one with the least amount of features. However, it will also be the most competitively priced one, and to Sony and most consumers, that's what really matters in the long run.
28 comments | go to source (www.psxextreme.com) | send to friend
Register as a member to subscribe comments.

Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

  • 0 thumbs!
    Dai | November 24, 2007
    Not too hard to see this coming. Heh...
  • 1 thumbs!
    SS4Gogeta | November 24, 2007
    Man I'm glad I have the 60Gb model. Now I'm thinking of getting another one for redundancy. Too bad they stopped the 60Gb model... it is by far the best model.
    • 0 thumbs!
      sten mk II | November 28, 2007
      How? It costs more than the 80GB, and didn't come with a game, and has less GBs...

      Don't bring up the stupid "it can't play all PS2 games" because I didn't buy a PS3 to play PS2 games. Besides, the 80gb can anyway.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Play ISDF | November 24, 2007
    Somehow, I doubt people are going to be jumping for joy to see the 80GB phased out. I know I'm not jumping for joy, especially considering around my parts the PS3 is still expensive as all *bleep*, so I haven't had a chance to pick one up, and now I won't possess the option of having a nice big hard drive whenever I get around to it. Sony, I really hate you at the moment >_>.
  • -2 thumbs!
    Final Blade | November 24, 2007
    Hello why do you people need to have the big hard-drive from start, all you need to get is a bigger one ike 200GB for like a 150 or even a external hard-drive that costs less than a Wii.

    This article is a rumor anyway there is no way they are phasing out the 80Gb model. People still want backwards capability. I see this as a rumor and nothing more.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Play ISDF | November 24, 2007
      Some people have a lot of stuff they may want to store on their hard drives, and that can add up rather quickly on a 40GB hard drive. For instance I have about 40GB used up on this computer for music, pictures and videos alone.

      Now, considering that Sony wants $1000 for a PS3 that has games that cost more than the average 360 game usually from what I've seen, can't get a bigger hard drive without burning $200 for what you suggested, a 200GB hard drive, and having to put it in manually unless another $20-100 is thrown down the drain depending on who your buying from, with all that in mind, wouldn't you expect Sony to be less of an ass and give a bigger hard drive for the amount of cash they want? I don't think it's much to ask for, seriously. But this is just my opinion, you don't have to agree with it, but it's just what I think.
      • -3 thumbs!
        Final Blade | November 24, 2007
        Yes and no, your forgetting when they announced the 80GB model the same time when the price-cut for 60GB, everyone was pissed that they were making larger space instead of lowering the price and getting more games. Im not denying having a bigger harddrive space isn't good, im just saying you can 3 times the amount of space for the same price as game or even as low as the PS2. Besides external hard-drive is better anyway.

        Cool 1

        Cool 2
        • -1 thumbs!
          Play ISDF | November 25, 2007
          But not everyone has an extra $200 lying around after just burning $1000 for a PS3. Keep that in mind.
        • 0 thumbs!
          Final Blade | November 25, 2007
          Im just saying HD size should be the least of concern. I mean if the 20GB had the same stuff the 60 had i would have got that and just gotten a bigger external hard-drive.

          I understand what you mean though, in other area's that the PS3 is expensive more than the U.S.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Shadow2k5 | November 24, 2007
    I was expecting this as people have had long enough to get the more expensive, BC modules so they can't possible complain about only being able to buy the 40GB as Sony is trying to make the Ps3 available to people on a lower budget.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Revenger of Wastelan | November 24, 2007
    60GB's are phased out? I still see many of them here. Oh well, I guess I'll just have to use my PS2 for all PS1/2 games, and just have to "tolerate" the good price.
  • -1 thumbs!
    Incidnia | November 24, 2007
    They are waiting for their stocks to run out. It's a shame really, since they only have a 1 year warranty, anyone who had a 60GB which broke would be forced to get a lesser system, right?


    I was in a rush to get the 60GB system but I don't want one, I don't need flash card slots and I have a PS2 AND PSone if I wanna play other games.
  • 1 thumbs!
    Supernouva | November 24, 2007
    Sony is screwing themselves over if they do this.
  • 1 thumbs!
    Saiya | November 24, 2007
    I agree with Supernouva. This wouldn't be to great of a decision by Sony if it is true.
  • 0 thumbs!
    SvR2008 | November 24, 2007
    Why the hell would they do that!

    Sony just get stupider!
  • 1 thumbs!
    Linkin Park Fan | November 24, 2007
    Stupider is not word.

    Anyways...this is extremely dumb on sony's part.
    • 1 thumbs!
      sten mk II | November 28, 2007
      "stupider is not word" isn't a complete sentence...
  • 1 thumbs!
    Red 9 | November 24, 2007
    But people need the 80GB! Some people do actually want Backwards Compatability.

    Sony, this is by far the most idiotic move you've made since you released your PS3. The PS3 is great, but Sony, you're jumping into a grave here.

    There's no harm in having a 40GB and an 80GB. None at all.
  • 0 thumbs!
    StabWound | November 24, 2007
    They're probably going to start charging for ps2 emulation on the 40gb later one, because you know they have it working as its on the 80gb so theres really no reason for it not to be on the 40gb unless they plan on charging for it later.
  • 1 thumbs!
    Subzer0 | November 24, 2007
    Sony are screwing themselves. Thank God I have the 60GB. I believe its by far the best model yet.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Alvaroduck | November 26, 2007
    Glad I got the 60GB when it came out too. Can't blame Sony for doing this, though, people want cheaper PS3's.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Storm | November 26, 2007
    I agree, Sub. 60 GB ftw! Besides, I'm just happy to get the features that the 40 GB doesn't come with. This is definitely a bad move for Sony...GB don't matter when you get an external HDD, but if they can throw in the features for the 40 GB, it's fine.
  • 0 thumbs!
    TheBradman1andOnly | November 26, 2007
    Make up your *bleep*ing mind, Sony.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Gothic Girl | November 27, 2007
    *Sigh* I wish Sony had made up their minds at the start, instead of continuously releasing new GB models and fazing out old ones. It's getting ridiculous. People don't need all this commotion when it comes to buying a game console.
    I haven't got a PS3 yet because I was waiting for the games I am interested in to be released first. But now I'm regretting not getting the 60bg version when I had the chance. If the 40gb version ends up being the only version left, then I'm sure there will be alot of people (including myself) questioning whether or not it's worth it. There are too many features that the 40gb version doesn't have, that I (and many other gamers) want.
    • 0 thumbs!
      sten mk II | November 28, 2007
      The only thing the 40 GB doesn't have, is 2 less USB ports (who needs to use 4 all at once anyway?), 40GB drive, and it can't play PS2 games.

      I don' think it isn't all that bad. Especially since Killzone II, Haze, MGS, Tekken 6 are all coming out soon. People will be playing those games, rather than PS2 games.

      I see tons of 80GBs all around. I went to the mall, and there's a 4 or 5 foot wall of 80gbs stacked up.
      • 0 thumbs!
        Gothic Girl | November 29, 2007
        And lack of Backwards Compatibility is exactly why I don't want a 40gb. Once I get a PS3, I want to be able to sell my PS2 console and just play all my Sony games on PS3.
        I'd rather not have to keep both consoles. It's more convenient just having one.

        Just because new PS3 games are being released, doesn't mean people don't still want to play their older PS1 and PS2 games.
        • 0 thumbs!
          Final Blade | November 29, 2007
          I understand what you mean GG and quite honestly i agree but really the sales hasn't really gone up until they lowered the price and by doing that you will need to give up stuff. BC is major but thats what everyone was getting a PS3 for, and not to play next gen games. And thats where Sony probably drew the line and said we need to increase our library and get the PS3 games on a selling road. All hope isn't lost though, Sony said if the demand after awhile is still high on BC they will start making the 60's again. Besides Ebay has a alot of them for decent price ranges, you can even get some that is cheaper than 40GB's one if your lucky. When i got mine i got the system, two wireless controllers and DVD remote for $360. Thats a steal considering it was 600 or 500 when i got it. But like Koloth said i think the 60GB doesn't even have 100% backwards capability, I still have PS2 and PS1 and my old systems, I just can't sell them. Its pointless doing so its not like your going to get alot of money for it, sometimes you might get $20 or so dollars for it. just my input.
  • -1 thumbs!
    Supernouva | November 28, 2007
    There's still the internet if Sony really does send the 80GB to hell.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.

Submit Newshelp

Top Contributors

This Month
Gothic Girl 589 pts
chautemoc 322 pts
Deathsythe 289 pts
Silver Mir.. 192 pts
Akira_EX 140 pts
Tyranitar24 135 pts
Agrias 81 pts
Coltrain 74 pts
All-Time
Gothic Girl 14848 pts
Krunal 11813 pts
Linkin Par.. 9920 pts
Final Blade 8668 pts
xsynergyx 8079 pts
mistermostyn 7868 pts
Silver Mir.. 7378 pts
chautemoc 6774 pts
ITANI 6350 pts
Storm 5644 pts

Stats

Today
Published News: 8
Comments: 101
Points Given: 282
Users Registered: 0
This Month
Published News: 140
Comments: 1066
Points Given: 2405
Users Registered: 9
All Time
Published News: 9819
Comments: 65440
Points Given: 157254
Users Registered: 484

Conventions / Trade Shows

(0.2639/d/aeon)