Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  0 thumbs!

  Jeterocks | December 11, 2007
  hahaha, I figured that something would be posted correcting them selves. It was to good to be true.
• 
  -2 thumbs!

  Red 9 | December 11, 2007
  I'm not getting GT5 Prologue or GT5 anymore. This is ridiculous. If Forza and every other next gen racer can do it, why not GT5? Rubbish. This is the new age, damage modelling is necessary. GT's always been too arcadey.
  • 
    -2 thumbs!

    Final Blade | December 12, 2007
    Dude seriously stop your complaining. Just cause this doesn't have car damage your giving this game bad rep, seriously this game will be one sick ass game to hit millions of sales. The overall game is still kickass i would rather have a polished up game than have everything looking great and this feature sucking and giving it bad scores.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  dmf_dynasty | December 11, 2007
  I don't really mind that much. Damage modeling has always seemed really unrealistic. These guys are so crazy about making their games as realistic as possible that they're most likely not putting in damage modeling until it's been perfected. It would have been nice, but I really don't mind.
  
  And at Red 9, dude, what the hell? Just because it doesn't have damage modeling in Prologue and possible/most likely in GT5 you're not getting the game? The great Gran Turismo gameplay and incredible graphics mean nothing to you because your side mirror doesn't fall off when you hit the wall? You're just looking for ways to bash it and I'm really not sure why.
  • 
    1 thumbs!

    Seeker X | December 12, 2007
    That's cuz he cries too much, and this is plenty of evidence of him doing so.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Danger | December 12, 2007
  Well that's a big "mess" up! They should have just went ahead and implemented the damage modelling once they had announced it instead of having to back track.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Coi Cki | December 12, 2007
  You having a bad day again, Red 9? GT5 will be a kickass game, damage or not.
  • 
    -2 thumbs!

    Red 9 | December 12, 2007
    You don't know the half of it...
    
    I'm just annoyed at the dishonesty these people have. One day they tell us how beautiful the damage looks, and then suddenly they tell us there is none. But seriously, damage modelling has been in every driving game on next gen consoles. To not include it is ridiculous. GT4 was docked almost a whole point for not including it.
    
    It's the 'real' driving simulator...with invincible cars that never flip over or crash...
    • 
      -1 thumbs!

      Final Blade | December 12, 2007
      Its GT5 prologue man, they never denied or confirmed the GT5 having car damage. You get worked up for no reason seriously.
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      CRUNK JUICE | December 13, 2007
      wait...you say damage modelling has been on every driving game on the next gen systems...correct me if im wring but...NFS Carbon...doesn't have damage modelling...right? Ah...thought so...
• 
  0 thumbs!

  kik36 | December 12, 2007
  As long as the rumble controller is released by the time this game is, I will gladly overlook any damage left out of the game. I really need that force feedback to race.......without it makes every racing game too arcadish for me.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Red 9 | December 13, 2007
  All right, all right, I over-reacted...sorry.