Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  1 thumbs!

  DragoniteBallZ | January 03, 2008
  I don't know how good it would turn out not being made by Crytek or using CRYEngine2.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  JelalTrueshot | January 03, 2008
  True, I share your worry. I was actually surprised to hear they were not working on the game. I guess CryTek is more interested in Crysis and this mystery IP.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  slumpy monkey | January 03, 2008
  well if the rumor about crysis comeing to consoles is true, than Farcry is going to have some big competitition
• 
  1 thumbs!

  VeGiTAX2 | January 03, 2008
  Finally? the game was just barely announced as an upcoming title, given that it's still being developed it's not that much of a shocker to see it going multiplatform given that it is Ubi and Ubi ported the life out of the original anyway.
  
  Finally would be in reference to Crysis by EA and Crytek. Farcry 2 =/= Crysis
  
  The amount of confusion between EA and Crytek with Crysis and Ubi and Farcry 2 is really bad these days. It'd be nice to get people on the right page.
  
  It's doubtful we'll see Crysis on the console level anyway, with the game in realtime consuming over 1GB of ram during levels you'd be hard pressed to find HDD caching coming close to compensating for that given how slow data transfer rates are compared to RAM speeds.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Final Blade | January 06, 2008
    Wow you make a good point Vegitax2 i didn't realize Crysis needed 1GB of ram. Learn something new everyday. I can see that not being able to put it on consoles anyway.
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      VeGiTAX2 | January 06, 2008
      Crysis shot
      
      Using relaxed settings still and not running at 1080 it consumes over 1GB of memory in game not including the OS consumption (320mb when doing the shots) and not including RAM consumption on the video card as well. (1920x1200 on High (not very high) consumes 615MB of Video memory)
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Pinkrhyno | January 03, 2008
  Ehm, the Farcry 2 engine is like the biggest competitor to CryEngine 2, I don't know how well it'd run on the 360 & Ps3.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Incidnia | January 03, 2008
  So all the videos for it so far were on PC?
  
  I actually want this game though, I got the old FarCry for the hell of it on the 360, this aughta be awesome though.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  DragoniteBallZ | January 03, 2008
  Well I dunno. Ubisoft made one Far Cry without Crytek and it was a disaster.
• 
  -1 thumbs!

  djjimmy2k2 | January 05, 2008
  another PC exclusive down the *bleep*ing drain. all the best PC games are getting console releases, why? do we PC gamers not deserve any exclusives?
  • 
    1 thumbs!

    VeGiTAX2 | January 05, 2008
    Given that it's Ubisoft we're talking about and Farcry, it's doubtful the game was ever going to be PC exclusive after they ported the original Farcry to everything they could possibly get their hands on before regardless of the quality of the port.
    
    I don't recall Ubi ever talking about it being a PC exclusive regardless though. Unless it's another case of someone confusing Crysis with Farcry 2.