19 hours 51 mins ago
170
Game Sequels We Want To See Happen
67
11 Games That Capture the Essence of America
10 hours 30 mins ago
64
Best Buy's PS3 bundle comes with Metal Gear Solid 4 and Killzone 2
19 hours 1 mins ago
55
Wii MotionPlus makes big spash in Japan
19 hours 50 mins ago
35
The Bender Podcast - Transformers testes, Torrents, and The Conduit
9 hours 37 mins ago
35
Xbox 360 set to Replace Sky Boxes?
15 hours 58 mins ago
33
Take a Gander at NIS' PS3 Exclusive RPG, Last Rebellion
8 hours 20 mins ago
28
How Many Beatles Songs Should Go Into the New Beatles: Rock Band ?
13 hours 45 mins ago

Submit a Story
Register
Get Started
Webmaster Tools



Finally would be in reference to Crysis by EA and Crytek. Farcry 2 =/= Crysis
The amount of confusion between EA and Crytek with Crysis and Ubi and Farcry 2 is really bad these days. It'd be nice to get people on the right page.
It's doubtful we'll see Crysis on the console level anyway, with the game in realtime consuming over 1GB of ram during levels you'd be hard pressed to find HDD caching coming close to compensating for that given how slow data transfer rates are compared to RAM speeds.
Using relaxed settings still and not running at 1080 it consumes over 1GB of memory in game not including the OS consumption (320mb when doing the shots) and not including RAM consumption on the video card as well. (1920x1200 on High (not very high) consumes 615MB of Video memory)
I actually want this game though, I got the old FarCry for the hell of it on the 360, this aughta be awesome though.
I don't recall Ubi ever talking about it being a PC exclusive regardless though. Unless it's another case of someone confusing Crysis with Farcry 2.