Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  2 thumbs!

  iLLmatic | March 24, 2008
  Hell no I can't connect and its pissing me off.
• 
  2 thumbs!

  Silver Mirror | March 24, 2008
  Another company screws up the PS3 version of a multiplat game
  
  When will they learn?
• 
  2 thumbs!

  Subzer0 | March 24, 2008
  I didn't see that coming. *bleep*ing developers.. >_>
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Seeker X | March 24, 2008
  That's a surprise, the same shit happened with Vegas. Either way, I haven't had these connection problems so far, but I'm hoping it stays that way.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  SvR2008 | March 24, 2008
  *bleep*ing hell, hope this gets fixed soon, I'm looking to get the game.
• 
  -2 thumbs!

  Sereph | March 24, 2008
  Inherent problem with the PSN or continued *bleep*-up?
  
  You decide. Either way, it's incredibly annoying that nothing good ever comes out of the PSN except Resistance.
  • 
    1 thumbs!

    Seeker X | March 24, 2008
    Does talking out of your ass pay off much? Vegas 2 *bleep*s up and suddenly it's the PSN, yet strangely the other games play seamlessly online (Then for some obscure reason you decide to beat down the PSN's reputation without a basis or good reason). Ubisoft (or any third party online support like DemonWare) is responsible for Vegas online.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Existenz | March 24, 2008
  Its a *bleep* up, the same happened with the original Vegas... Ubisoft do suck.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Xenctuary | March 24, 2008
  I'm sure it's just first launch problems that will be fixed within the month. The reason Microsoft doesn't face the same issues is because they can't afford to let down their paying subscriber base.
  • 
    2 thumbs!

    Seeker X | March 24, 2008
    It's probably the way Vegas's Online is structured and how Ubisoft did it. Same thing happened during the first days of the first game as well.
  • 
    1 thumbs!

    Sereph | March 25, 2008
    Which is the whole point. With Live, you have millions of people who have the power of veto if they decide not to pay for Live anymore, with PSN, if someone gets pissed and doesn't ever log into it again, Sony couldn't care less since they're not putting any revenue into the network.
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      InnerDemon | March 25, 2008
      That's what I also like about Sony and Nintendo. Free online play. I don't feel like paying to play the best part of the game.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  HBK619 | March 27, 2008
  For everyone in favour of free online play remember, you get what you pay for.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    iLLmatic | March 27, 2008
    That doesn't apply in this case and that cliche is really annoying to hear now. Granted, PSN is not as stable as XBL, but this particular issue does not occur with other PS3 games. Like others have said, the same thing happened with Vegas 1. For this to happen again, Ubisoft should be ashamed.
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      Sereph | March 28, 2008
      Then explain why this doesn't happen with XBL games then.
      • 
        0 thumbs!

        Seeker X | March 28, 2008
        Alright, this is getting annoying. Apparently I'm talking to my *bleep*ing self, as my last statement got disregarded...
        
        PSN: Lobbying/Matchmaking depends on Developer/Third party Matchmaking support
        
        Live: Lobbying/Matchmaking depends on Microsoft, which is where your money pays off.
        
        Now before anybody starts twisting more panties over this, the game is not broken or unplayable in anyway. So you guys need to stop making this a bigger issue than it really is. The PSN is playing the same games online for free, same quality and nothing is toned down, not to mention these cases are not even that common. So for the people that love to talk shit about it should AT LEAST play them on the PSN first before running their mouths off; it gets embarassing after a while.