Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  -1 thumbs!

  bob8294 | May 11, 2008
  Now it won't be long before we hear of people dying from over-exhaustion.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Stainless | May 12, 2008
  Finally a challenging game It will be fun to test my "luck" with this game.
• 
  -1 thumbs!

  Final Blade | May 12, 2008
  _{Wow that long, i don't remember Killzone 1 being that long. Well i hope its good. Other wise people will complain about how the length.}
• 
  0 thumbs!

  NastyButler | May 12, 2008
  Thats pretty long for a level. Saving @ checkpoints are a must I would assume. Otherwise thats a long time for some of us to be sitting playing one level.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Silver Mirror | May 12, 2008
  The industry needs longer games, unless of course there are only 5-6 levels
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Ameer | May 12, 2008
  I'm all for longer games, but 45-50 mins per level seems excessive. Unless it rolls on in an MGS-like manner.
• 
  -3 thumbs!

  Taker4ever | May 12, 2008
  This is NOT a good thing. You people ever played the PS2/Xbox game 'BLACK'? Fantastic shooting mechanics, superb graphics, brilliant destructible scenery - yet completely let-down by 1 hour levels with NO save points and rare checkpoints. Not fun at all.
  • 
    1 thumbs!

    iLLmatic | May 12, 2008
    Black was nothing more than a tech demo. Thats the reason it failed.
• 
  2 thumbs!

  Silver Mirror | May 12, 2008
  How is a 45 min level any different from three 15 min levels? As long as there are checkpoints, different environments and an advancing plot then it'll be fine
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Seeker X | May 12, 2008
  The first game had a balanced checkpoint system, so I'm not worried about this. The longer a game goes, the better.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  SvR2008 | May 12, 2008
  Agree with Silver Mirror, as long as their are checkpoints I'm fine with it.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  CRUNK JUICE | May 13, 2008
  Why do I have a feeling that there will be few levels to compensate for this...