Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  0 thumbs!

  The_Don | May 11, 2008
  That's pretty dumb. Sure, shoot at the humans as long as you don't go for the fish!
• 
  3 thumbs!

  Linkin Park Fan | May 12, 2008
  Hey they fish aren't shooting back now are they.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  TurMoiL911 | May 12, 2008
  ... Wow.
  
  Shooting hundreds and hundreds of people ? No problem. Shoot a couple of fish in a river ? Suddenly there's a public outcry.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  tallteen86 | May 12, 2008
  Kinda messed up...
  
  Animal activists would be all over this, if fish were shootable in the game....I can't remember, can you shoot the birds? I think I tried, but they didn't die? I can't remember....
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Ameer | May 12, 2008
    Those slacker human activists.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Silver Mirror | May 12, 2008
  For some reason people find it harder to watch most animals die than other humans. I guess were used to seeing humans dieing
  
  But I doubt anyone would care if a fish died
• 
  0 thumbs!

  StarJet | May 12, 2008
  Didn't the people at the ESRB eat fish when they were kids? If it's good to eat fish, then what's the big deal with killing fish?
  This is just plain lame.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  ShinyMilotic | May 12, 2008
  Lol what the hell, must be some pretty animated fish deaths.
• 
  2 thumbs!

  Xtrordinary | May 12, 2008
  
  That's not how it works...
  
  The ratings are extremely percentage-based; Meaning that being able to kill fishes pushed the supposedly already high number into crossing the boundary to Mature.
  
  If you couldn't kill human, you would have been able to kill the fish. They probably just thought it was a better idea to remove the fishes rather than humans.
  
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    kik36 | May 12, 2008
    Thanks for that info, it makes a lot of sense.