You mean graphically above. Resistance 1 is a much better game than Killzone 1, and we know much more about Resistance 2, than Killzone 2 at this point. Nobody can say right now which will be better, but Resistance has better gameplay reputation.

Either way, it'll be heaps and heaps. Eeny, Meenie, Meiny, Moe? Can't lose. :3

Huh?? Killzone is still in alpha stage - have you seen the recent Sony Gameday videos? There's at least 6 of them which show more gameplay (in alpha stage), and graphics rivaling Call of Duty 4.

The ally AI however is still as bland as it was in Killzone, so hopefully they work on that. (I spotted allies standing over areas they could have been covering from, when being shot at, and not returning fire realistically like CoD4. Same exact look of KZ1, so they really need to fix that)

As it stands, their first priority seems to be to get things to look as good as possible, smoothen out the frame rate, work on the world design, and then focus on the tweaks to gameplay elements, since those will probably take the longest amount of time, it'd be easier to get everything else out of the way first.

Sony never 'hyped up' Killzone - magazines and internet gamer sites did. People over-anticipated it, and when there's over hype, there's bound to be people like you who simply dismiss it completely and keep from the crowds. Not a stupid move either, don't get me wrong, but it's ignorance nonetheless. You should at least attempt to play it to judge it. In this day and age though, you can get with less than that sometimes - IE: There are mission walkthrough videos on youtube which give you nearly the full experience of playing. From mission 1 to the end.

Don't count chickens before they hatch, that sort of thing.

Obvious, but I loved the first killzone. It had problems, mainly due to Guerilla's inexperience, but with all the support Sony's dev' division is pumping into KZ2, you can expect quite a bit to be worked out, and much improved on in the final release.