174

Alternate Sources:

Hands-on with BioShock PS3, new movies posted (videogaming247.com)

Gamespot goes hands-on with the PS3 version of BioShock

Tyranitar24 | September 06, 2008 | Previews | Playstation 3 XBOX 360 Gaming Tech/Hardware

BioShock was a popular Xbox 360 game, will the PS3 version also turn out to be a success? According to Gamespot's hands-on article, it's taking the right path.

They note that the PS3's control feel better and the rumble feature adds a cool touch to the game. In addition, the game has all of the DLC that the Xbox 360 version had and as we know already, will feature trophy support.

While what Gamespot got to see was promising, they left wanting a lot more.

2K has roped in a cavalcade of development teams to handle the conversion of the game for the PlayStation 3. 2K Marin, 2K Boston, 2K Australia, and Digital Extremes are tag teaming the project, which aims to come up with a faithful conversion of the original game. The teams are also including a few bells and whistles in the form of content, as well as visual tweaks. Fans of the original game will be familiar with the single-player Story mode, which follows the trials and tribulations of plane crash survivor who stumbles onto a mysterious underwater utopia called Rapture.

News Story attached to:

BioShock 2 [PS3, PC, XBOX360]

21 comments | go to source (uk.gamespot.com) | Add to favorites!

favourite this article |

send to friend

67	Gamespot: The DRM Dilemma (0) May 22, 2009
53	GameSpot previews fantasy-action game TRINE (4) May 19, 2009

Comments

0 thumbs!
Newcloud | September 06, 2008

so its pretty much the controller that make it slightly better then the 360 version??
- 0 thumbs!
  iLLmatic | September 06, 2008
  
  It has content not in the original version
  - 0 thumbs!
    Newcloud | September 06, 2008
    
    but the added DLC wouldn't make the ps3 version much better
    - 0 thumbs!
      Red 9 | September 06, 2008
      
      But we also get exclusive features not available in the 360 version apart from the existing DLC (which is already found on-disc for PS3).
    - 0 thumbs!
      Xenctuary | September 07, 2008
      
      Plus that download content was free, I believe. There's no reason for the PlayStation 3 version not to have them. Even better since there's exclusive content too (such as "challenge maps").
    - 0 thumbs!
      Red 9 | September 07, 2008
      
      Don't you mean there's no reason for PS3 NOT to have the DLC?
    - 0 thumbs!
      Xenctuary | September 09, 2008
      
      Haha, yes I did mean that. Edited.
0 thumbs!
Zerpent | September 06, 2008

I'm eagerly awaiting this game. I was kind of disappointed when they chose not to release it for the PS3 at start, but at least we're getting it now.
1 thumbs!
The Jocker | September 06, 2008

I'm surprised to hear they preffered the PS3's controller..

Still, I haven't played the PS3 version so I'll have to take their word for it.
0 thumbs!
tallteen86 | September 06, 2008

I'd personally like to see even more plasmids....

Well, if I have the money, I'm getting the PS3 version, as it has some extras.
1 thumbs!
Final Blade | September 07, 2008

quote
While what Gamespot got to see was promising, they left wanting a lot more.
_{Basically this means its not up to par or quality of 360? Wow, figures. I mean if they were left wanting more, when they never said that about 360 version that thats bad.}
- 0 thumbs!
  The Jocker | September 07, 2008
  
  You could read it that way, or you could read that they wanted more as in MOAR!!!!
  - 1 thumbs!
    Tyranitar24 | September 07, 2008
    
    Yeah, they wanted to play more of it.
    - 0 thumbs!
      Newcloud | September 07, 2008
      
      i agree with final blade here the first part of the sentence is positive the second was a negative
      meaning... the game is good but they where expecting more
- 0 thumbs!
  Xenctuary | September 07, 2008
  
  You've misread Final Blade. Tyranitar24 didn't write that that "they were left wanting more", but "they left wanting more". Read the source itself and you'll understand.
1 thumbs!
BlackLabel | September 07, 2008

Obviously the game is shaping up well but when you get a preview just like a demo you are always left wanting more, you always want to play more, use the new content and everything else. People read into shit far too much these days and turn it into something it isn't. It is a simple case of they wanted to play more and if anything were expecting more in the case of new features, the base game is identical to the 360 version if not better in places thanks to the longer development cycle.
0 thumbs!
Final Blade | September 07, 2008

_{Well either way that was poor wording on the authors part. But im not even getting excited about this game coming to the PS3.

I can still both ways being right at the end. I'll just wait til more info comes out.}
- 1 thumbs!
  The Jocker | September 19, 2008
  
  It wasn't poor wording on the author's part. It was you misreading the article.
  - 0 thumbs!
    Slumpy monkey | September 19, 2008
    
    And that was you bumping up an 11 day old article.
  - 0 thumbs!
    Final Blade | September 19, 2008
    
    _{Actually no, it was poor wording had he said this instead: "While what Gamespot got to see was promising, they left wanting a lot more of the game" Then It would have made better sense like Xenc stated.}
    - 0 thumbs!
      The Jocker | September 19, 2008
      
      Then why did nearly everyone else interpret it as the author intended?
      
      Oh yeah, because you misread it.