116
rate

Bioshock 2 Multiplayer a Bad Thing?

June 07, 2009 in Previews comments 4

Some games are just meant be a singleplayer only game. Such as the first bioshock, which one game of the year from many publications. Well it was announced that Bioshock 2 will have multiplayer, while others rejoiced, some felt a little worried. Will the game be ruined by its multiplayer aspect?

Just as video games were about to claw their way out of the cultural ghetto in the games-as-art debate, along comes the announcement that Bioshock 2 will feature multiplayer deathmatch. We're not even sure how we feel about a sequel to our 2008 game of the year, let alone the idea of shooting other players in the face over PSN, but there it is. The whole thing is like the equivalent of announcing a follow-up to George Orwell's classic political satire 1984, but in comic book form, and with big honkin' titties on the front cover.
Sayyed via ps3informer.com »
Favourite this article Add source
| More
Report!
News story attached to:

Comments

Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 0
    Tiger of Wu Jun 7, 09
    Was that the full article? That half-baked, whiny piece of trash was an article? Have I missed something? I must have, 'cause all I saw was someone bitching and then telling us things we knew a while ago. What the fudge? Even in the short time the writer makes his point he makes it like a complete and utter moron.

    And here I thought the rappergamervarietyhour was as bad as it could get
  • 1
    Zero and X Jun 7, 09
    So an optional part of the game automatically ruins it?

    Ummm, no.
  • 0
    pwned227 Jun 7, 09
    how could more features make a game worse?
  • 0
    Goldva_X Jun 7, 09
    ... :/

    This guy belongs to the same group of people that bitched about Uncharted 2 having multiplayer. It's ok though, this basically proves that those games are perfect so the fanbase gets bored and decides to troll the games.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.