Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  0 thumbs!

  Gary15 | August 24, 2007
  finitely over harsh, the wii isn't meant to be a console for flashy graphics but simply for fun games more than anything and the gamecube sold at a low price too yet it didn't sell very well, people wouldn't buy it if it was a bad console low prices or not. Plus it has a lot of appeal to people who might not normally play games all that much which helps it's sales a lot.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  huntyr | August 24, 2007
  its also hard to tell given the poor quality of the video. I wouldnt rate the game on that video.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  MrSponget | August 24, 2007
  The video itself is just bad quality. You can trust EA not to have Nintendo 64 graphics in their games. It's not surprising after seeing those Cruis'n screenshots but you have to notice that here it's just a case of shitty video quality.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Gogetenks | August 25, 2007
  From what I can tell, it doesn't look too bad. Not great, but not "horrendous" The video quality is terrible, I can hardly read the scores. I wouldn't judge the game off of this. The textures and character models seem to be solid. Keep in mind that the (very hard to read) "Work in Progress" label is on it, so it could improve.
  
  The animations are quite bad, but otherwise it looks tolerable. I'm not impressed, but the Wii has seen uglier games.