A "casual, borderline-retarded journalist" (yes, the review's disclaimer actually said that!) from a popular Hong Kong gaming magazine has given Final Fantasy XIII a mere 4/10, calling it the "biggest swindle in gaming history" and the "biggest joke of 2009."

The review itself seems biased, but still, a 4/10? Ouch!


[Discuss in the Final Fantasy XIII forum]

Scenario: 2.0 — "An epic tear jerker"
System: 1.0 — "Such a crude system barely warrants being called an RPG at all."
Graphics: 9.0 — "Full marks here."
Sound: 7.0 — "Mostly quality."
Enthusiasm: 1.0 - "As if you could play this for 100 hours! I could put up with 8."
Total: 4.0 — "To think it got this bad…"

"The game is complete linearity until the open areas near the end. You can't even backtrack."

"Of all the RPGs I've played in recent years, this is the first which has been so linear that it's little more than riding an amusement park ride."

"I had heard the opinion that "It's amazing once you get to Chapter 11," but why should you spend 20 or 30 hours on a game to get to the only enjoyable part? Just how do they intend to make me play this? Do they think I'm some kind of masochist?"

"A button mashing puzzle game with no real strategy or RPG elements and a plethora of annoying features, game as a whole is little more than a digital novel of sorts."

"For such a game to approach 2 million copies sold must be due solely to the strength of the Final Fantasy brand"

"Biggest swindle in gaming history"

"Biggest joke of 2009."
| More
News story attached to:
Additional sources:
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 2
    Red 9 Jan 11, 10
    I fink somebawdy wikes attention a widdle too much
    • 1
      Hideo1 Jan 11, 10
      You don't need to talk like that just because it's Hong Kong magazine you racist
      • 0
        Red 9 Jan 11, 10
        It's baby talk!! zOMG don't you see the difference??
        • 1
          dwg14390 Jan 11, 10
          I thought baby when I saw it too. And in a Tommy Pickles voice.

          Hey Miss Razz, where's that "attention whore" photo of yours?
          Oh wait I found it
        • 1
          Hideo1 Jan 11, 10
          I thought baby as well dwg, I just saw an opportunity for a joke. Nice to see you caught on.
        • 0
          Zero and X Jan 11, 10
          DAT ASS

  • 0
    Aussie Legend Jan 11, 10
    Bah, get off the *bleep*ing bandwagon.
  • 0
    Miss Razz Jan 11, 10
    Is it wrong that my first thought was "A 4/10? So that means it's still better than Dirge of Cerberus?"
  • 0
    Storm Jan 11, 10
    DoC was fun, though mediocre. Squeenix just can't do much outside the RPG genre, really.

    I'm shocked at this low review, though. It's a little...too low. Still, I'm gonna go with the rest of the gang here and assume they are doing this for attention, heh.
  • 0
    conel3 Jan 11, 10
    Obviously attention seeking. Either that or just someone who hates RPG's and shouldn't be allowed to review them. I don't understand how people can call themselves reviewers when they say in the review that they havn't even finished the game. NOBODY should ever be allowed to write a review without even finishing the game first.
    • 0
      Existence Jan 11, 10
      Unfortunately, most RPG reviews are written before the reviewer has finished the game, due to time restrictions.
  • 1
    DragoniteBallZ Jan 11, 10
    I blame XBOX360. If Square Enix would have stayed exclusive to Sony it would have been haxx xhit!!! +D
  • 0
    ruledbysecrecy Jan 11, 10
    Hahaha, this review is hilarious.
  • 0
    Killosity Jan 11, 10
    I am disappointed in the FFXIII title, but 4/10! Wow!
    They must have really disliked the title.

    Or nitpicking to the extreme. Good move though.
    Everyone loves to read about the magazine who rips apart a much-hyped title..

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.