421
rate

The Kartel: Battlefield: Bad Company 2 vs Modern Warfare 2 - Which multiplayer campaign is the best

March 01, 2010 in Reviews comments 4

With the release of Battlefield: Bad Company 2, a triple A title from the folks over at EA and DICE, there will obviously be the comparison between the current king of shooters,Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 and this newer contender.

BBC 2 has stirred up some controversy as the multiplayer beta experience had been hit or miss for some people. After some hands on game playing with the final copy of the game, we can now definitely say whether DICE delivers another killer Battlefield game.
IrieMars via thekartel.com »
Favourite this article Add source
| More
Report!
News story attached to:

Comments

Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 0
    Dragoshi1 Mar 1, 10
    BFBC2 has vehicles, and dominating in a goddamn army tank is better then the AC-130 to me.
    • 0
      Chad Mar 2, 10
      Haha, not to me. I'm not too sure about BFBC2, but when comparing the tanks from World at War to MW2's AC-130 (a legit one, that is), it feels just all around cooler.

      But yeah, if the vehicles in BFBC2 have a whole lot of depth, without being overcomplicated, then I may have to take back this statement. ^__^
      • 0
        Dragoshi1 Mar 2, 10
        WaW Tanks were badass. They made you feel like a one man army.


        Until the satchel charges started flying.
  • 0
    Xeros the Slayer Mar 2, 10
    Destruction 2.0, 'nuff said.

    Don't like how they make it sound like DICE was trying to copy MW2 though since pretty much everything system-wise in Bad Company 2 is in 2142. And that game had a shotgun that fired C4 and a Rocket Sniper which I doubt either of these two can compete with.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.