Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  -2 thumbs!

  Existenz | August 21, 2007
  PSM know nothing just like EGM both as bad as each other.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    volacide | August 21, 2007
    I don't believe that and if you run around like that all the time you're just going to look like a complete fool. You can't disown every publication that gives a PS3 game a bad score.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Sort | August 22, 2007
    Quit being such a fangirl of Sony and realize that some of the games from the PS3 won't get a perfect F'N score in every magazine. Makes me fuggin' sick to listen to fanboy/girl rants all day long.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Linkin Park Fan | August 21, 2007
  Bull, played the beta and the online carnage is *bleep*ing amazing.
• 
  -1 thumbs!

  Gamesta100 | August 21, 2007
  The only magazine I listen to is the Official Australian PS mag 'cause 99% of the time I agree with their reviews.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Ameer | August 22, 2007
    
    
    This comment is gold. They overrate EVERYTHING, by at least 1-2 points more than they deserved.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  BANDITO ATTACK | August 21, 2007
  "then your best bet is to save your money or rent."
  i'd love to know where you live, if your rent is only 60$.
  >__>
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Seeker X | August 22, 2007
  In the first page, at the end of it you'll see that one of their main complaints is the "lack of bots". LACK OF BOTS?! WITH GLOBAL SERVERS?! WTF, MATES?!
  
  

  quote Comment on the Review
  

  The graphics are great but its not Bioshock.
  The sound is good but its not up there with Heavenly Sword.
  The game control is great, but its not as sharp as a Tony Hawk Game.
  The multi-player is great but there is no ending for the game.
  
  I agree perhaps reviewers are over thinking the reviews. Its a multiplayer only game and nothing more. Its not trying to be Halo and its Not trying to be BattleField 2042.
  
  I didn't know games got deducted points for just being enjoyable to play. It also seems that originality means nothing to PSM as well.
  
  EDIT: The reviewer got his AZz Owned playing it. Look at the bottom left picture( of a warhawk). Under the picture It says pretty fragile. Did the reviewer expect the warhawks to be completely indestructible? I bet he did and he is sad that his plane never got off the ground because the other "mean players" kept picking on him. Freaking Noob.

  I actually wouldn't be surprised if the reviewer was pissed off that he was getting his ass raped in the game and was too pissed off about it...AND/OR, they might as well disliked it being multiplayer only, and it being $40.
  
  I'm on a *bleep*ing rant here, anyone involved in the Beta KNOWS that this game is AT LEAST an 8.5 and above, but that's not what pisses me off, what pisses me off is that any attempt of defending your point of view of the game automatically labels you as another ignorant fanboy.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Silver Mirror | August 22, 2007
  Wow what a lame review I read that magazine and boy was it crap
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Linkin Park Fan | August 22, 2007
  I completely agree with you seeker.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  JJBDude | August 23, 2007
  Does seem quite weird for me to hear that a potential 10/10 game on the Playstation 3 got a rating of 6.5. I never heard of this magazine though so I won't believe that they have justified the game correctly.