Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  1 thumbs!

  Jeterocks | November 14, 2007
  Is there any reason IGN gave it a 7.7 for the 360 version and a 7.5 for the PS3 version?
  
  Seems like the game is getting more good reviews that mediocre reviews. That is a good sign I guess.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    DEZVOUS | November 14, 2007
    Yeah it's weird, IGN says that the frame rater is slugish in the PS3 version but GameSpot (in a rare turn of events) actually says that the PS3 version has a more solid frame rate than the 360 version!
    
    I'm confused... someone's not telling the truth and I wouldn't think that GameSpot would lie to help the PS3...
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      DEZVOUS | November 14, 2007
      WHO THE *bleep* IS THUMBING DOWN TRUE SHIT?
      
      GameSpot:"PS3 owners are blessed with a slightly more solid frame rate"
      
      IGN PS3 review:"The animations are top-notch, but tough to enjoy with slowdown."
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Pyrazor | November 14, 2007
  The review teams are different for consoles so you get slightly different scores now and then.
  
  I can't say I'm surprised. I always thought the game looked like it had a good engine but it looked like it would lack good content.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Zero and X | November 14, 2007
  Its either they loved it, or they thought it was good, but nothing special. I dont care I want it for christmas.
• 
  2 thumbs!

  tallteen86 | November 14, 2007
  Is there a reason why the trailer thing, says "Neverwinter Nights"? >_>
  
  100's? WTF are they playing at? Even 9.5 is a bit high, biased reviewers probably (is there really any other kind? Everyone is biased to some degree)...
• 
  0 thumbs!

  DragoniteBallZ | November 14, 2007
  A lot of the lesser rankings pick mostly on repetativeness and awkward storyline.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Final Blade | November 14, 2007
  Holy shit, Gamespot rated a PS3 game 9/10, stop the presses people. No surprise for IGN, they even rated the 360 version low man IGN is truly tripping lately. Eurogamer sucks anyway.
• 
  -4 thumbs!

  iLLmatic | November 14, 2007
  I love how people always cry foul when it comes to ratings of games they haven't even played for themself. _____ sucks, I'm not reading ______ anymore. Relax and wait to "review" the game yourselves.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Final Blade | November 14, 2007
    Yes but IGN rated the 360 version the same as PS3 so wtf is up with that. Its not so much foul play its the fact people are lying. Gamespot never rates a PS3 game 9/10 or any that i saw yet IGN bad mouths both the 360 and PS3 version. I agree with Dez here.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  black doom | November 14, 2007
  Metacritic:
  
  Xbox360
  
  PS3
• 
  0 thumbs!

  SvR2008 | November 14, 2007
  Good or bad reviews, I'm still gona get the game no matter what.
• 
  2 thumbs!

  Jaw Knee | November 14, 2007
  Eurogamer must've had their heads up their pragmatic, biased asses then. Silly them!
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Final Blade | November 15, 2007
  Holy shit Planet Xbox 360 rated the 360 version 67 wow thats the lowest 360 game score and even xbox game i have ever seen.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  HBK619 | November 16, 2007
  No game is perfect, so any of the reviews which say it is, are full of crap. I feel that if you read IGN USA, IGN UK and IGN AUS you get a fairly broad view, as the editors from different regions all pick out different good and bad points.