20 hours 39 mins ago
183
Which Console Had The Best Exclusives In 2008?
162
Top 25 Starting Weapons!
14 hours 42 mins ago
150
5 things you don't know about NXE
21 hours 28 mins ago
106
Outbreak Of RRoD As Warranty Expires Thanks To NXE
21 hours 10 mins ago
84
Eidos playing dirty again with reviews. Current victim: Tomb Raider Underworld
20 hours 48 mins ago
80
Wii Game Buying Guide For Christmas 2008
16 hours 30 mins ago
76
Sam's Club makes swapping your Red Ringed Xbox quick, easy, and fun!
20 hours 21 mins ago
62
Should You Come Out Of The Gaming Closet On A First Date?
14 hours 42 mins ago

Submit a Story
Register
Get Started
Webmaster Tools



First off, how in HELL is Halo 3 so innovative as to warrant an award? Sure there was a level creator, but come on. If anything, an innovation award should go to a game like Mass Effect 2 years in a row. Halo 1 was innovative. Halo 3 is just a repeat of its prequel. In fact I can imagine COD4 does the genre better than Halo 3. You can't even go prone in Halo 3.
Secondly, Halo 4 would be serious overkill. They can't just keep saying "We've finished the fight...until the sequel." The plotline would be so messed up if they insist on releasing new Halo games.
Halo should have been a MMO, since clearly the lack luster of the offline play was horrible. And yet they made the online better each time they made halo. Its like they wanted to make the online great but said "Meh, lets throw this here and there and it should be fine", without real effort. I was appalled with the offline play.
It gave a sence of freedom within the levels, even though they were linear.
Anyone who knows about offline to online play knows the difference of the two, they made online so much superior to offline with no mixture.
Im not going to BS and just hate on it for some stupid reason like you.
I know the online is better, im just saying I enjoyed off-line, tard.
EDIT- I jus realized you were talking to Final blade, Lulz.
But that's what sells Halo, so what's wrong with that?