In an attempt to put over F.E.A.R. 2's graphics, Warner Bros. released some screenshots containing doctored images of F.E.A.R. 1. The article does another comparison of actual in-game shots for both games, and the results are startling. The images are in high-resolution so it may take a while for them to load.

Now you can yell shenanigans at us for the screenshots, but these are press shots not our own. However, due to this particular circumstance, I thought it would be proper to do a comparison to the screenshot comparison issued to the press. So without further ado, here’s a screenshot comparison to the press release screenshots. The first two shots are from the press circuit and the bottom two screenshots are from the actual F.E.A.R. 1 game. The final comparison is our own side-by-side comparison of F.E.AR. 1 and F.E.A.R. 2.
| More
News story attached to:
Images about this story:
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 0
    Red 9 Jan 30, 09
    I was afraid it was a PS3/360 comparison, of which none ever turn out well.

    There's an obvious increase in quality, even though the increase doesn't necessarily put it to jaw-dropping levels.
    • 0
      Zero and X Jan 30, 09
      When the first FEAR came out, it looked amazing for its time, but by the time it was released on the consoles, it only looked average, and by todays standards, looks like crap. The new game looks really good, but not the best.
  • 0
    vicrabb Jan 31, 09
    Alma seems more feminine but still looking like crap - I hate Alma's older form - the way she's designed, not her mind .
  • 0
    Anubis Jan 31, 09
    Wow, This is kinda funny if you think about it... I don't think a few doctored pics of the first game will make FEAR 2 any more successful...
  • 0
    Darknet Jan 31, 09
    I think it looks worse in FEAR 2. Bring back the sparks, please.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.